NU671 Unit 2 Binge Eating Developmental Course Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN PMHNP Psychopathological Disorders and Psychotherapy Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NU671 Unit 2 sample is a developmental course summary of binge eating disorder, built around a composite 24-year-old night-shift stocker whose history already reads as a timeline. It was prepared for Purdue Global NU 671, PMHNP Psychopathological Disorders and Psychotherapy, in the MSN psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner program. It moves through four stages, early risk from eight to twelve, dieting from thirteen, onset at sixteen and maintenance in her twenties, and marks the strength of the evidence at each. Project EAT supplies the prospective link between dieting and later binge eating, and the Stice cohort gives the peak onset age. The last sections turn the timeline into care priorities and state its limits.

CourseNU671 PMHNP Psychopathological Disorders and Psychotherapy
UnitUnit 2
Paper typeDevelopmental course summary
LengthAbout 1,140 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NU671 Unit 2

1

From Skipped Lunches at Thirteen to Night-Shift Binges at Twenty-Four: A Developmental Course Summary of Binge Eating Disorder

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU671: PMHNP Psychopathological Disorders and Psychotherapy

Unit 2 Developmental Course Summary

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The patient is composite; ages and details are bracketed. Evidence strength is noted at each stage.

What this part is doingThe summary uses the patient's own timeline as its structure, so each stage of the disorder is anchored in her history.
2

The Patient Today

Ms. [T.], [24], stocks shelves on the overnight shift at a discount store. Two or three times a week, after her shift ends at [07:00], she buys food on the way home and eats rapidly, alone, until she feels painfully full, then sleeps through the afternoon. She describes the episodes as "a switch flipping" and feels disgusted with herself afterward. She does not vomit or use laxatives, and she does not exercise to compensate. Her body mass index is [34]. She meets criteria for binge eating disorder: recurrent episodes of eating an unusually large amount with a sense of loss of control, marked distress, and no regular compensatory behavior.

She sought help not for the eating but for low mood and poor sleep. Like most people with the disorder, she had never been asked about binge eating. In a national survey of American adults, binge eating disorder had a lifetime prevalence of [3.5] percent in women and [2.0] percent in men, was associated with severe obesity and with many other psychiatric disorders, and only a minority of people with it had ever sought treatment for it (Hudson et al., 2007).

Stage One: Early Risk, Ages Eight to Twelve

At [eight], classmates called her names about her size, and at home her mother and older sister were often dieting. She remembers being told to have a smaller portion than her brothers. At [11] she began eating in secret at her grandmother's house after school.

Evidence note: weight-related teasing and a family focus on dieting are commonly described in the histories of people with binge eating, but most of that evidence comes from retrospective reports and cross-sectional studies, so these are best treated as risk markers rather than established causes. The stage is included because it shapes how she came to see food and her body, not because it predicts the disorder with any precision.

Stage Two: Dieting, Ages Thirteen to Fifteen

At [13] she began skipping breakfast and lunch to lose weight, eating little until dinner. She lost [5] kg that year, regained it the next, and started again. This pattern of restriction followed by regain continued through high school.

Evidence note: this is the stage with the strongest prospective support. In Project EAT, adolescents followed for five years, those who used unhealthful weight-control behaviors such as skipping meals were at about six times greater risk of later binge eating with loss of control than those who did not, with an odds ratio of [6.4] in girls; they also gained more weight (Neumark-Sztainer et al., 2006). Her skipped lunches were intended to prevent weight gain, and the best prospective evidence suggests they did the opposite, setting up the binges that followed.

What this part is doingThe dieting stage carries the strongest evidence, and the highlighted sentence states the paradox the evidence supports.
3

Stage Three: Onset, Ages Sixteen to Nineteen

At [16], after a breakup, she ate most of a family-size box of cereal and a sleeve of cookies late at night and felt unable to stop. Episodes like this happened every few weeks through the rest of high school, usually after a restricted day or an emotional event. By [19], after moving out, they happened weekly.

Evidence note: in an eight-year prospective study of young women, the peak age of onset for binge eating disorder was [18 to 20], and a notable share of those with subthreshold binge eating went on to the full disorder, [28] percent, suggesting an escalation process for binge eating in particular (Stice et al., 2013). Her course, from occasional episodes to weekly ones by [19], fits that pattern. The strength here is moderate: the study followed young women in one community, and progression rates may differ elsewhere.

Stage Four: Maintenance, Ages Twenty to Twenty-Four

Several things now keep the pattern going. She restricts during her shift, eating little because she is busy and self-conscious in the break room. She arrives home exhausted and hungry at the time of day when her mood is lowest. Night work disrupts her sleep and appetite, and she is isolated from friends who keep day hours. After a binge she feels ashamed, resolves to eat less the next day, and the cycle restarts.

Evidence note: the same prospective study found that one-year remission was common for binge eating disorder, but that recurrence was also high, about a third (Stice et al., 2013). That fits a disorder that comes and goes with circumstances, which her history also shows: she had a four-month period without binges during a daytime job at [21].

What the Timeline Suggests for Care

Reading her history as a timeline changes the plan in three ways. First, restriction is part of the problem, so advice to diet, which she has received from two clinicians, is likely to make it worse; regular eating across the night shift, including a planned meal at [02:00], is a first target. Second, the episodes cluster at a predictable time, after work, when she is tired and alone, which gives treatment a specific place to intervene. Third, her low mood and sleep problems are intertwined with the eating and deserve treatment alongside it, not after it.

Cognitive behavioral therapy for binge eating, which begins by establishing regular eating and then addresses triggers and self-evaluation, is the treatment most consistent with this course. Her weight should not be the main measure of progress; the frequency of binges and her sense of control are.

How the Timeline Was Built

The history was gathered over two sessions. The first used open questions about her eating at each school stage, prompted by landmarks she remembered well: her grandmother's house, the move to high school, the first job after graduation. The second checked the timeline against a few external anchors, such as the year of the breakup and the months of the daytime job, because retrospective accounts of eating are easily compressed or rearranged. Her sister, with her permission, confirmed the family dieting and the teasing. Building the timeline together also had a clinical effect: seeing the pattern laid out, she said for the first time that the binges "make sense," which she found less shaming than thinking of them as a lack of willpower.

Limits of the Summary

Each stage draws on different kinds of evidence, and the early stages are the weakest. A developmental timeline also risks making the course look inevitable, when many teenagers who diet never develop the disorder and many adults recover. The summary is a way of organizing her history for treatment planning, not a proof of how her disorder arose.

What this part is doingThe limits section guards against reading a single timeline as a causal chain.
4

References

Hudson, J. I., Hiripi, E., Pope, H. G., Jr., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biological Psychiatry, 61(3), 348-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040

Neumark-Sztainer, D., Wall, M., Guo, J., Story, M., Haines, J., & Eisenberg, M. (2006). Obesity, disordered eating, and eating disorders in a longitudinal study of adolescents: How do dieters fare 5 years later? Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106(4), 559-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2006.01.003

Stice, E., Marti, C. N., & Rohde, P. (2013). Prevalence, incidence, impairment, and course of the proposed DSM-5 eating disorder diagnoses in an 8-year prospective community study of young women. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(2), 445-457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030679

NU671 Unit 2 instructions, in plain terms

For Unit 2 you trace the course of a disorder across development, usually through a composite person whose history illustrates it. Prompts ask for risk factors, age and pattern of onset, escalation or remission, and the factors that maintain the disorder in adulthood, each supported by epidemiological or longitudinal research. A summary of four to six pages is common, and some templates want a timeline figure. Graders look for a clear separation between risk markers and established causes, and for evidence matched to the stage it describes. The strongest summaries end by showing how the course informs treatment, for example by identifying behaviors that began as coping and now keep the disorder going.

How this NU671 Unit 2 example is built

The patient's current pattern opens the summary, with her binges after night shifts and the diagnostic criteria she meets, followed by prevalence and treatment-seeking data from the national survey. Each of the four stages has the same structure: what happened in her life at that age, then an evidence note that grades the support. The dieting stage carries the Project EAT odds ratio and a highlighted sentence on the paradox of restriction. The onset stage uses the eight-year cohort for peak age and progression, and the maintenance stage uses it for recurrence. A section explains how the timeline was gathered and checked. Three care priorities and a limits paragraph close the summary.

NU671 Unit 2 rubric: what earns full points

Developmental summaries in this course are commonly graded on accuracy of the course described, quality and placement of evidence, integration of the case, clinical implications and writing. Accuracy covers onset ages, prevalence and typical trajectory. The evidence row rewards prospective studies where they exist and honest labeling where only retrospective data are available. Integration earns points when the patient's timeline and the research pattern are set side by side at each stage rather than in separate sections. The implications row looks for specific changes in care that follow from the course. Writing points depend on a logical structure, accurate citations and precise use of diagnostic terms throughout the paper.

NU671 Unit 2 help: mistakes that cost points

The most frequent problem is presenting risk factors as causes, which the evidence rarely supports. Another is using a single cross-sectional prevalence figure to describe how the disorder develops over time. Students often skip the dieting stage or treat it as unrelated, when it carries the strongest prospective evidence. Some summaries describe the typical course but never return to the case. Others recommend weight loss for a patient with binge eating, which the course itself argues against. And a timeline without limits can read as inevitable, when many young people who diet never develop the disorder and many adults recover without specialist care. Keep the patient's voice in the timeline, since her own words about each stage make the evidence notes easier to follow.

Get an NU671 Unit 2 example written to your instructions

Developmental summaries differ mainly in the disorder assigned, so name the one in your NU671 Unit 2 prompt along with any case it supplies and the rubric. The first summary is free, built on that prompt and rubric, and ready within 24-48h, arranged as dated stages with the design behind every population figure named. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More NU671 papers and MSN samples

NU671 Unit 2 questions, answered

Does a developmental summary need a case?

Not always. Some prompts ask for the disorder's course in general; others supply a person. Where a case exists, alternating between the typical pattern and that individual shows understanding better than either alone. Where none exists, a brief composite illustration is often welcome, provided it is labeled composite and does not replace the population evidence.

How recent should epidemiological sources be?

Recent enough to be current, though the landmark surveys remain the reference points. The National Comorbidity Survey Replication dates from the early 2000s and is still widely cited for age of onset. Name the year, and where a newer study updates a figure, cite both. Graders check that numbers carry a source rather than that every source is new.

Where do risk factors end and causes begin?

A risk factor raises probability; a cause, in this literature, is rarely established. Temperament, family history and early adversity each shift the odds without determining the outcome, and a summary that keeps that language precise reads as better informed. Causal models belong to other assignments, so risk is described here as risk.

Where can I find a free NU671 Unit 2 sample paper?

The full NU671 Unit 2 developmental course summary appears on this page, with four graded stages, the care priorities that follow and three references. A summary tracing a different disorder can be written for your prompt.

Does dieting lead to binge eating in NU671 Unit 2?

The summary cites Project EAT, in which adolescents who used unhealthful weight-control behaviors such as skipping meals had about six times the risk of later binge eating with loss of control, with an odds ratio of 6.4 in girls, and gained more weight over five years.