NU651 Unit 9 Reflective Narrative on Anaphylaxis Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN AGACNP Introduction to Acute Care Management Clinical I Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NU651 Unit 9 sample is a reflective narrative about a two-minute delay in calling for epinephrine when a 37-year-old woman developed anaphylaxis to a first dose of piperacillin-tazobactam. It was written for Purdue Global NU 651, AGACNP Introduction to Acute Care Management Clinical I, taken in the MSN acute care nurse practitioner track. The author recognized anaphylaxis within a minute but asked a history question instead of naming the drug. Johns' model guides the analysis of three influencing factors: a nursing habit of completing the picture first, uncertainty about a student's role and a question that felt like diligence. WAO guidance and a series of fatal reactions show why minutes matter.

CourseNU651 AGACNP Introduction to Acute Care Management Clinical I
UnitUnit 9
Paper typeReflective narrative
LengthAbout 810 words, 5 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NU651 Unit 9

1

Two Minutes Between Knowing and Doing: A Reflective Narrative on Anaphylaxis to a First Dose of Piperacillin-Tazobactam

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU651: AGACNP Introduction to Acute Care Management Clinical I

Unit 9 Reflective Narrative

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The patient and the encounter are composite; times, doses and vital signs are bracketed.

What this part is doingMinutes structure the description, because the subject is tempo and a clock makes the gap measurable.
2

Description

Ms. [J.] was a [37]-year-old woman admitted with pyelonephritis, whose antibiotic was changed to piperacillin-tazobactam after her culture grew a resistant organism. She had no recorded allergies. At [14:02] her nurse started the infusion. At [14:06] the nurse called us to the room: Ms. [J.] was flushed, had hives across her chest and arms, and said her throat felt tight. I listened to her chest and heard wheezing. Her blood pressure was [82/46] and her pulse [128].

At minute one, I recognized anaphylaxis. I knew she met the clinical criteria: acute skin involvement with respiratory compromise and low blood pressure after a likely allergen (Sampson et al., 2006). What I said out loud was a question: "Have you ever had penicillin before, or any reaction to antibiotics?" While she answered, the nurse stopped the infusion. At about minute two my preceptor, who had followed us in, said, "Epinephrine, point five, IM, thigh, now." The nurse gave intramuscular epinephrine [0.5] mg into the anterolateral thigh at [14:10], four minutes after the nurse's call. Her wheeze eased and her pressure rose to [104/64] within [ten] minutes. She was monitored overnight and did not need a second dose.

Reflection: What Was I Trying to Achieve?

I was trying to be thorough. I wanted to confirm that the reaction fit an allergy before treating it, and asking about prior penicillin exposure felt like diligence. But the diagnosis was already clear, and no answer to my question would have changed the first treatment. I kept gathering information after the decision had been made, because gathering is what I know how to do while I am uncertain about my right to act.

Influencing Factors

Johns' model asks what internal and external factors influenced the response (Johns, 1995). I can name three.

The first is a habit from [ten] years of bedside nursing, where I completed a picture before calling a provider, since the provider would ask for it. That habit served me well as a nurse and served the patient badly here.

The second is role uncertainty. I was not sure whether a student could call for a drug aloud with a preceptor about to arrive. That hesitation cost time, and it is the factor I most need to address, because in an emergency the first person to name the treatment is the one who starts it.

The third is that the history question felt productive. It was a real question with a real use later, for her allergy record, and that made it easy to mistake for the next step.

Johns' model also asks how others were feeling. The nurse had stopped the infusion before I spoke, which told me she had recognized the reaction too and was waiting for someone to name the drug. Ms. [J.] was frightened and struggling to answer my question while her throat tightened. Looking back, my question asked her to do work that helped no one at that moment.

What this part is doingThe analysis rejects two easy readings, a missed diagnosis and a gap in knowledge, before naming the factors that were really at work.
3

Evidence and What Could Have Been Done Differently

The World Allergy Organization guidance is unambiguous: epinephrine injected into the thigh muscle comes first in anaphylaxis and should be given without delay, at 0.01 mg per kilogram up to 0.5 mg in adults (Cardona et al., 2020). Delay matters. In a review of fatal reactions in the United Kingdom, the median time from exposure to respiratory or cardiac arrest was five minutes for reactions caused by drugs given in hospital (Pumphrey, 2000). Ms. [J.] was about four minutes into her reaction when the epinephrine went in, which is close to that median.

A better sequence would have been: stop the infusion, say "this is anaphylaxis, epinephrine [0.5] milligrams IM now," position her lying down with legs raised, give oxygen and call for help, and ask the history question afterward. None of those steps required anything I did not know.

What this part is doingThe better sequence is written out step by step, and every step in it was already known to the author.
4

Learning

I have written and rehearsed one sentence for the next time: "This is anaphylaxis; epinephrine point five IM now; I will stay with her." My preceptor agreed that a student may and should say it, and that she would rather stop an unnecessary dose than wait for a necessary one. I have also asked the unit educator whether our anaphylaxis kit can be checked on my next shift, so that I know where it is before I need it.

What I take from this encounter is that knowing the answer and saying it are different skills. The second one needs practice, and it needs permission I can give myself.

5

References

Cardona, V., Ansotegui, I. J., Ebisawa, M., El-Gamal, Y., Fernandez Rivas, M., Fineman, S., Geller, M., Gonzalez-Estrada, A., Greenberger, P. A., Sanchez Borges, M., Senna, G., Sheikh, A., Tanno, L. K., Thong, B. Y., Turner, P. J., & Worm, M. (2020). World Allergy Organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020. World Allergy Organization Journal, 13(10), Article 100472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100472

Johns, C. (1995). Framing learning through reflection within Carper's fundamental ways of knowing in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(2), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22020226.x

Pumphrey, R. S. H. (2000). Lessons for management of anaphylaxis from a study of fatal reactions. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 30(8), 1144-1150. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00864.x

Sampson, H. A., Muñoz-Furlong, A., Campbell, R. L., Adkinson, N. F., Jr., Bock, S. A., Branum, A., Brown, S. G. A., Camargo, C. A., Jr., Cydulka, R., Galli, S. J., Gidudu, J., Gruchalla, R. S., Harlor, A. D., Jr., Hepner, D. L., Lewis, L. M., Lieberman, P. L., Metcalfe, D. D., O'Connor, R., Muraro, A., . . . Decker, W. W. (2006). Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: Summary report. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 117(2), 391-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1303

The Purdue Global NU651 Unit 9 instructions

The Unit 9 assignment asks for a reflective narrative about a clinical moment in which your reasoning or actions fell short of what you knew. You describe the event in enough detail to make it real, analyze it with a structured reflective model, examine the factors that influenced your response, bring in evidence on what should have happened and explain what you will do differently. Most sections name Johns' or Gibbs' model. A narrative of about four pages with a handful of sources is typical, and the patient must be composite or thoroughly de-identified. Timing matters in narratives about emergencies, so note the minutes as precisely as you can.

How this NU651 Unit 9 example is built

The example reconstructs the encounter minute by minute, from the infusion start to the epinephrine and the patient's recovery, so the delay can be measured. It rules out two easy readings, a missed diagnosis and a gap in knowledge. Johns' cue questions carry the analysis: what the author was trying to achieve, three influencing factors and how others were feeling, including the nurse who had already stopped the infusion. The evidence section cites the WAO guidance and a series of fatal reactions in which drug-related arrests came at a median of five minutes. A better sequence is written out, and a rehearsed sentence closes the narrative.

Where the points sit in the NU651 Unit 9 rubric

The Unit 9 rubric weighs the description, reflective analysis, use of the model, integration of evidence and the plan for future practice. A timed, concrete account of the event earns the description points. Analysis is weighted most heavily; the rubric rewards identifying causes that are not obvious, such as role uncertainty, over general statements about stress. Use of the model counts when its cues are followed, not only named. Evidence should support the lesson directly. The plan earns credit when it is concrete, such as a rehearsed sentence and a check of the anaphylaxis kit, and when it can be tested in practice. Reflections that stay with one moment rather than the whole shift tend to go deeper.

NU651 Unit 9 help from the desk

A common mistake is turning the narrative into a case report with a brief reflection at the end. Another is blaming the outcome on inexperience without examining what actually slowed the response. Students sometimes present the delay as a knowledge gap when the knowledge was there. The model's stages are often skipped. Some narratives quote treatment guidelines at length, which a reflection does not need. Others avoid naming the feeling or the hesitation, which is where the learning sits. And plans that say to act faster next time, without a specific practice, earn fewer points. Last, write the next-time sentence you will actually say, and rehearse it.

Get an NU651 Unit 9 example written to your instructions

Whichever encounter the NU651 Unit 9 prompt asks about, the model narrative works on an invented one, shaped by the prompt, the reflective model named and the rubric. Written within 24-48h and free as a first order, it reconstructs the moment minute by minute and locates the cause of a delay rather than the delay alone. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More NU651 papers and MSN samples

NU651 Unit 9 questions, answered

Does the narrative have to be about a clinical mistake?

Not necessarily, though a moment where reasoning lagged is what this unit commonly asks for. The sample examines a delay rather than an error, which lets it focus on behavior under pressure. Any encounter the student chooses should be one the student actually had, described with composite or removed details, and the sample shows only the structure.

How much clinical detail belongs in a reflective narrative?

Enough to make the moment real and the analysis checkable, and no more. The sample's timeline carries the clinical facts, bracketed, and everything after it examines the author's thinking. Detail that might reveal a patient, a unit or a colleague should be changed or left out, and case facts should never crowd out the reflection.

Is it acceptable to cite a fatality series in a reflection?

Yes, if it serves the argument. The sample cites one to show what the delay could have meant, and nothing more. Reflections are not literature reviews, and a single well-placed source usually does more than a list. The patient in the sample is invented and survived, and the sources describe populations, not individuals.

Where can I find a free NU651 Unit 9 sample paper?

This page holds the complete NU651 Unit 9 reflective narrative, with the timed encounter, Johns' analysis of three influencing factors, the evidence and the rehearsed plan. Describe your own clinical moment to the desk and a free narrative can be written to your prompt.

What is the epinephrine dose for anaphylaxis in the NU651 Unit 9 sample?

The sample follows the World Allergy Organization guidance: intramuscular epinephrine into the thigh at 0.01 mg per kilogram, up to 0.5 mg in adults, given without delay. The patient received 0.5 mg about four minutes into her reaction.