| Course | NU651 AGACNP Introduction to Acute Care Management Clinical I |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 2 |
| Paper type | Rounds presentation script |
| Length | About 620 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MSN |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NU651 Unit 2
Ninety Seconds on a Calcium of 13.8: A Rounds Presentation Script for Suspected Myeloma With Hypercalcemia and Kidney Injury
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NU651: AGACNP Introduction to Acute Care Management Clinical I
Unit 2 Rounds Presentation Script
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The patient is composite; values and doses are bracketed, and the timing marks show where the ninety seconds are spent.
Script
[0 to 15 seconds] Mr. [H.] is a [67]-year-old man with two months of low back pain, admitted overnight with severe hypercalcemia and acute kidney injury, most likely from malignancy with multiple myeloma leading the differential; his calcium is falling.
[15 to 25 seconds] Overnight he received [four] liters of isotonic saline and one dose of calcitonin, [4] units per kilogram. He is less confused this morning and passing good volumes of urine.
[25 to 45 seconds] Calcium has come down from [13.8] to [12.6] milligrams per deciliter. Creatinine is [1.9] against a baseline of [1.0]. Parathyroid hormone is suppressed at [8], which points away from a parathyroid cause. His total protein is [9.4] with an albumin of [3.2], so the gap is wide, and hemoglobin is [9.6], new since last year. PTH-related peptide and vitamin D metabolites are pending.
[45 to 75 seconds] Problem one is hypercalcemia of malignancy. Plan: continue saline to a urine output of about [150] milliliters per hour and add denosumab [120 milligrams] today. The Endocrine Society guideline suggests denosumab rather than an intravenous bisphosphonate, and with his kidney injury it avoids a nephrotoxic drug; we will watch for low calcium afterward. Problem two is suspected myeloma: serum protein electrophoresis with immunofixation, serum free light chains and a low-dose whole-body CT today, and hematology consulted. Problem three is acute kidney injury, likely from calcium and volume loss, possibly cast nephropathy: hold his lisinopril, no contrast, recheck creatinine at [six] hours.
[75 to 90 seconds] He is full code, eating, and his daughter is updated. The decision I need from you is whether we start denosumab today or wait for the light chains.
Prepared Answers to Likely Questions
Why not zoledronic acid? Both are recommended for hypercalcemia of malignancy, but the guideline suggests denosumab over an intravenous bisphosphonate, and zoledronic acid carries a risk of further kidney injury that its labeling asks prescribers to weigh in patients like him (El-Hajj Fuleihan et al., 2023). Denosumab is not cleared by the kidneys, although patients with kidney impairment are at higher risk of low calcium after it, so calcium will be checked daily for [five] days.
What makes myeloma the leading cause? He has three of the four CRAB features that define myeloma-related organ damage: high calcium, kidney injury and anemia, plus back pain that may be the fourth, bone lesions (Rajkumar et al., 2014). A suppressed parathyroid hormone and a wide protein gap fit. Solid tumors that secrete PTH-related peptide remain possible, which is why that level was sent.
Why give calcitonin if its effect wears off? It lowers calcium within hours while saline and the antiresorptive take effect, and the guideline suggests combining calcitonin with an antiresorptive as initial treatment for severe hypercalcemia. Calcitonin buys the first two days; denosumab covers the weeks after.
Why the Plan Holds Together
The plan is ordered by what needs deciding today. Hypercalcemia comes first because the antiresorptive choice is the one decision the team has to make this morning. The myeloma workup follows because every test in it can be sent today and none changes the first decision. The kidney injury comes third because its treatment is mostly the treatment of the first two problems. A presenter who follows that order can be interrupted at any point and still leave the preceptor with the plan.
References
El-Hajj Fuleihan, G., Clines, G. A., Hu, M. I., Marcocci, C., Murad, M. H., Piggott, T., Van Poznak, C., Wu, J. Y., & Drake, M. T. (2023). Treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy in adults: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 108(3), 507-528. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgac621
Rajkumar, S. V., Dimopoulos, M. A., Palumbo, A., Blade, J., Merlini, G., Mateos, M.-V., Kumar, S., Hillengass, J., Kastritis, E., Richardson, P., Landgren, O., Paiva, B., Dispenzieri, A., Weiss, B., LeLeu, X., Zweegman, S., Lonial, S., Rosinol, L., Zamagni, E., . . . San Miguel, J. F. (2014). International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. The Lancet Oncology, 15(12), e538-e548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5
What the NU651 Unit 2 assignment asks for
The Unit 2 assignment asks you to write out a presentation for morning rounds on a patient admitted overnight, set out as it would be spoken. Most prompts set a time limit and expect a one-line summary, interval events, pertinent data, an assessment and a plan organized by problem. The presentation should commit to a working diagnosis early and include only the data that bear on decisions. Some sections ask you to anticipate questions from the preceptor and prepare short answers. The script is usually one to two pages, with sources for the main treatment decision so that the plan can be defended when questioned. Write it in spoken sentences, since a script that reads like a chart note will sound like one.
Inside the NU651 Unit 2 example
The example is laid out in timed blocks, from the first fifteen seconds to the last. The one-liner commits to malignancy with myeloma leading and says the calcium is falling, so what follows is heard as support. Data are filtered hard: a suppressed parathyroid hormone appears because it steers the search away from a parathyroid cause, and the protein gap appears because it points toward myeloma. The plan gives hypercalcemia the most time because the antiresorptive choice is today's decision. Three prepared answers cover the choice of denosumab, the CRAB features and the role of calcitonin, each in a paragraph short enough to say aloud.
Reading the NU651 Unit 2 grading rubric
The Unit 2 rubric usually weighs organization, clinical reasoning, selection of data, the plan and delivery within the time limit. Organization earns full points when the presentation leads with a summary that commits to a diagnosis. Reasoning is judged on whether the assessment explains why the leading diagnosis leads. Data selection counts when each result included moves a decision and routine normal values are left out. The plan must be specific, with drugs, doses and the next test. Delivery is graded on timing and clarity. Anticipated questions are often worth extra credit, because they show the presenter understands the decision well enough to defend it.
NU651 Unit 2 help from the desk
The most common error is a chronological presentation that reaches the plan only as time runs out. Another is reading every laboratory value, which buries the few that matter. Students often name the diagnosis without saying why it is likely. Plans sometimes list consults without saying what question each consult should answer. Some presenters choose a bisphosphonate without considering kidney function, or forget that denosumab can drop calcium too far. Finally, practice with a timer: most first drafts run at least a minute over, and the rubric usually deducts for it. Rehearse the prepared answers aloud as well; an answer that reads well on paper can still run too long when spoken.
Get an NU651 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Work begins from the NU651 Unit 2 admission, any time limit on the presentation, the rubric and the service the case is set on. The script arrives within 24-48h, with the first order free, written to be spoken, with a committed one-liner, filtered data and a plan ordered by what the team must decide. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More NU651 papers and MSN samples
- NU651 Unit 1: Pre-Rounding Discussion Post
- NU651 Unit 3: Daily Progress Note
- NU651 Unit 4: Structured Handoff Note
- NU651 Unit 5: Seminar Reflection
- NU651 Unit 6: Focused Case Write-up
- NU651 Unit 7: Clinical Question Brief
- NU651 Unit 8: Preceptor Feedback Reflection
- NU651 Unit 9: Reflective Narrative
- NU651 Unit 10: Admission-to-discharge Case Presentation
- NU650 Unit 2: Admission H&P, Rhabdomyolysis Case
- NU648 Unit 2: Dosing Weight Worksheet
- NU610 Unit 2: Focused SOAP Note
- NU605 Unit 2: Competency Self-assessment
NU651 Unit 2 questions, answered
Should a rounds presentation follow SOAP order?
Loosely. Subjective and objective data still precede the assessment, but a problem-based presentation compresses them and reaches the assessment fast. Some services prefer a strict order and others want the problem list almost immediately. The sample follows the common problem-based pattern and can be rewritten to whatever format a preceptor or site prescribes.
How long should a presentation on rounds take?
Often two to three minutes for an established patient and longer for a new admission, though services vary widely. The sample aims at 90 seconds for an overnight admission already stabilized. The number matters less than an early assessment; a short presentation that buries it is still hard to follow.
Can the script be about a patient I presented at my site?
The sample itself uses an invented patient. A student's own presentations draw on patients from the rotation, which is appropriate for coursework once identifying details are removed, and the student supplies those cases. Clinical hours, encounter logs and every preceptor rating stay outside the sample, which never substitutes for them.
Where can I find a free NU651 Unit 2 sample paper?
The full NU651 Unit 2 rounds presentation script is on this page, with timing marks, a three-problem plan and prepared answers to three questions. For a different overnight admission, you can ask for a free script built on your case.
How long should an NU651 Unit 2 presentation take?
The sample runs about 90 seconds for an overnight admission, the budget many hospitalist services use on busy mornings. New admissions sometimes get two to three minutes, so check the limit your preceptor or section sets before trimming.