Leininger's three modes of culture care decisions, each applied to one choice in an orthopedic patient's stay, shape the Unit 2 theory application as NU300 commonly frames it. Searches like "nu 300 unit 2 assignment example", "nu300 unit 2 sample" and "nu300 unit 2 example" land here.
Applying Leininger's Culture Care Theory to an Amish Man's Discharge After Hip Replacement
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NU300: Professional Leadership Transitions
Unit 2 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Composite patient and family written as a model document. No real person or community is described.
Introduction
The orthopedic unit where this paper is set admits patients from nearby Amish settlements several times a year, most often for fractures and joint replacements. Standard discharge teaching has repeatedly failed them: devices sent home without power to run them, follow-up calls to numbers that ring in a shared phone shed, and instructions written for a household organized very differently from the ones the teaching assumed. Madeleine Leininger's culture care theory, with its twin ideas of diversity and universality, was chosen because it was built for exactly this problem: care that is correct in general can be wrong for a particular culture, and the nurse's task is to find the form of care that fits.
The Theory
Leininger argued that every human culture has care, yet no two cultures express it in quite the same way, and that nursing care works best when it fits the values of the person receiving it (McFarland & Wehbe-Alamah, 2019). She named three ways a nurse can act on what she learns. Preservation, sometimes called maintenance, keeps the practices that already support health. Accommodation, or negotiation, bends the nursing plan to fit the culture. Repatterning, or restructuring, works with the patient and family to change a practice that may cause harm, and only with their agreement (Leininger & McFarland, 2006).
To gather the information these decisions need, Leininger developed the Sunrise Enabler, a guide that directs the nurse to cultural and social structure factors: religious and philosophical beliefs, kinship and social ties, cultural values and lifeways, economic factors, education and technology (McFarland & Wehbe-Alamah, 2019).
The Case
A composite 68-year-old Old Order Amish farmer had an elective right total hip replacement for osteoarthritis. His wife and two adult daughters stayed at the bedside in shifts. Read through the Sunrise Enabler:
Religious and philosophical factors. His community values humility, separation from the wider world and mutual aid. He accepted surgery as a means of continuing to work and to care for his family.
Kinship and social factors. Care is a family responsibility. His wife and daughters expected to do everything for him during recovery, and the community planned to cover his farm work.
Economic factors. Many Amish communities do not use commercial health insurance and instead share medical costs through church aid, so the family was attentive to the cost of every device and follow-up visit (Weyer et al., 2003).
Technology. His home has no grid electricity. The standard discharge plan included a motorized cold therapy device and a recommendation to call the clinic from home.
Three Nursing Decisions
Preservation: family participation in care. The standard approach would teach the patient and perhaps one caregiver. Instead, the nurse taught hip precautions to the patient and both daughters together, with demonstrations and return demonstrations, because the family, not the patient alone, would carry out his care. This preserved a cultural practice that supports health.
Accommodation: cold therapy without power. The motorized cold device could not run at home. The nurse replaced it with ice packs, a written schedule the family could keep, and instructions for protecting the skin. The goal, reducing pain and swelling, stayed the same; the method changed to fit the household.
Repatterning: early walking. The family's plan was for the patient to rest while they did everything for him. After hip replacement, early walking reduces the risk of clots, stiffness and deconditioning. Repatterning asked the family to change a practice rooted in care itself, so the nurse negotiated rather than ordered. She explained the reason for walking, asked what the family thought, and agreed on a plan in which a daughter walked with him three times a day and recorded each walk on a simple chart. The family accepted it once they saw it as another way of caring for him.
Where the Theory Helped and Where It Strained
The theory helped in three ways. It slowed the discharge down at the right moment, it gave the family a voice in the plan, and it gave the nurse a structure for noticing what the standard plan missed. Without the Sunrise Enabler, the lack of electricity might have been discovered only when the device failed at home. The three modes also gave the nurse language for distinguishing between practices to keep, adapt or change.
The theory strained in two places. First, it can encourage generalization: not every Amish family shares every practice described in the literature, and this family's views on cost and technology had to be asked about, not assumed. Second, the modes are presented as distinct, but the walking plan was partly accommodation and partly repatterning, since it kept the family at the center of care while changing what that care involved.
Conclusion
Leininger's theory turned a failed discharge pattern into three specific nursing decisions, each fitted to one family's culture. Its strength was in helping the nurse ask better questions; its limit was that the answers had to come from the family, not from the theory.
References
Leininger, M. M., & McFarland, M. R. (2006). Culture care diversity and universality: A worldwide nursing theory (2nd ed.). Jones and Bartlett.
McFarland, M. R., & Wehbe-Alamah, H. B. (2019). Leininger's theory of culture care diversity and universality: An overview with a historical retrospective and a view toward the future. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 30(6), 540-557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659619867134
Weyer, S. M., Hustey, V. R., Rathbun, L., Armstrong, V. L., Anna, S. R., Ronyak, J., & Savrin, C. (2003). A look into the Amish culture: What should we learn? Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 14(2), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659602250639
How this NU300 Unit 2 example is structured
Theory stays brief and application carries the paper, the balance these assignments reward. Leininger's three modes are defined in her own terms so the table can use them unexplained. Next, the patient is described through the Sunrise Enabler's factors: religious and kinship ties, economic concerns in a community that often pays medical bills together, and technology at home. The application section then takes the three decisions in order. Preservation comes first: the daughters learn hip precautions alongside the patient. Accommodation replaces a motorized cold device with ice packs and a schedule the family can keep. Repatterning is handled most carefully, because it asks the family to change a practice, letting the patient rest while they do everything, and the paper shows the negotiation rather than an order. A final section asks where the theory helped and where it strained.
Get an NU300 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Theorist chosen already, or still open? Either way, send the Unit 2 instructions and rubric along with a sketch of your unit and the kind of patient the theory should explain. The application arrives in 24-48h with the theory brief, the case composite and each decision linked to a named concept. No fee applies to a first sample. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
NU300 Unit 2 questions, answered
Which nursing theorist should I choose?
One whose ideas explain something you actually see at work. Sections commonly allow a free choice among grand and middle-range theorists, and the strongest papers justify the choice with a practice problem rather than personal preference. If your unit's challenge is comfort, symptoms or self-care, a different theorist may fit better than Leininger; the reason matters more than the name.
Can I write about a real patient?
Only as a composite with every identifying detail changed or removed, and many sections prefer a clearly fictional case. The sample's patient combines features common on an orthopedic unit and belongs to no single person. Describe the patient in enough detail to apply the theory, and add a line noting that the case is composite.
How do I avoid stereotyping when applying culture care theory?
Treat cultural knowledge as a starting question rather than a conclusion. Leininger herself emphasized learning from the patient and family. Note that practices vary within any group, cite sources for any general statement, and show the nurse asking before deciding. The sample checks each assumption with the family, which keeps the application respectful and accurate.