In Unit 2 of NU298CL, a goal revision memo like this one rewrites two goals after a virtual nurse and a split preceptor schedule changed the plan, and keeps two. Searches like "nu 298cl unit 2 assignment example", "nu298cl unit 2 sample" and "nu298cl unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished NU298CL Unit 2 goal revision memo looks like
Addressed to the preceptor and the clinical faculty member and dated [date], the memo runs just over a page. A two-sentence opening states what the first nights showed: admission histories on this unit are taken by a remote registered nurse over a bedside camera, and the preceptor works [two] of every [three] of the writer's shifts, with a second nurse covering the rest. A three-column table follows, headed original goal, what changed and revised goal. The admission goal becomes the bedside half of the process: skin, falls screening, and a check of the remote nurse's medication list against what the patient actually brought. The patient-load goal gains a line about briefing the covering preceptor at [19:00]. Call scripts and protected sleep stay as written, with a line under the table saying why. An unsigned response block ends the page.
How a NU298CL Unit 2 example is structured
Revision is argued rather than announced, so every changed row carries its cause and its evidence. The admission goal moved because the unit works differently from the assumption behind it, not because the writer fell short, and the memo keeps those two kinds of reason visibly apart. The patient-load goal moved for a practical reason, two nurses precepting on alternate nights, and its answer is practical too: a half-page briefing sheet handed to whoever is precepting that night. Revised goals keep the Unit 1 shape, a number, a skill, a shift and a document, so each one can still be validated the same way. The two unchanged goals get a sentence apiece, which shows the revision was selective rather than wholesale. In closing, the memo asks the preceptor for one of three responses: agreement, requested changes or a conversation before the next shift.
A camera above the bed
Admission histories on this composite unit are taken by a remote registered nurse over a two-way video link. The memo states that fact in one sentence and draws its consequence: a student cannot own a task the unit has assigned to someone else.
The bedside half of an admission
The revised second goal keeps the work that still takes place at the bedside: examining the skin, screening for fall risk, and comparing the remote nurse's medication list with the bottles and packets the patient brought. A discrepancy note for each of [three] admissions is the evidence.
Two preceptors, one briefing sheet
The preceptor works most but not all of the writer's nights. Goal one now includes a half-page briefing at [19:00] for whichever nurse is precepting, listing the goals in play and where the writer stands on each one.
Two goals left alone
Call scripts and protected sleep hours survive unchanged. The memo gives each a sentence: the first nights already produced [two] scripted calls, and the sleep schedule has not yet been tried on a full assignment.
A reply block, unsigned
Space for the preceptor's agreement, requested changes and a date sits at the foot of the page, empty, with a second line for faculty. The memo proposes; whether the revision stands is decided by others.
Where marks go in NU298CL Unit 2
A memo that rewrites every goal into something easier reads as retreat, and markers usually spot it by setting the old column beside the new. Revisions without a stated cause leave the preceptor guessing whether the unit changed or the writer did. Softening the evidence while the goal changes, replacing a written handover sheet with the words verbal report, quietly removes the proof. Blaming the unit or the second preceptor turns a planning document into a complaint. Leaving out the unchanged goals makes a reader wonder whether they were dropped. A revised goal that cannot be reached in the shifts remaining fails on arithmetic, so the dates need recounting. Presenting the revision as approved, or completing the faculty line, oversteps what the writer can supply, and detail naming the camera vendor or the facility does not belong in it.
Get a NU298CL Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Something on the unit probably worked differently than the first contract assumed; describe it in broad terms, without names. Upload the original goals, the Unit 2 instructions and the grading rubric. What comes back separates changes the unit forced from changes the writer chose, with reply lines blank. First custom sample free, usually within 24-48h.
NU298CL Unit 2 questions, answered
What is virtual nursing, and why would it change a student's goals?
Virtual nursing places a registered nurse off the unit, connected by camera and microphone, to handle tasks such as admission histories, discharge teaching and documentation checks. Many hospitals have expanded it to support bedside staff. A student whose goals assumed those tasks happen at the bedside may find them reassigned, which is a structural change worth stating plainly in a revision rather than treating as a personal setback.
Is revising goals a sign the first contract failed?
Usually the opposite. A contract written before the first shift is a forecast, and a thoughtful revision shows the writer read the unit accurately. What instructors question is revision toward comfort, where every goal gets easier at once. Keep the evidence standard the same, change what the setting requires, and state why each change was made.
Does the preceptor have to agree to the revised goals?
In most programs, yes, and faculty often review them as well. The memo is the student's proposal, so the agreement, any changes the preceptor requests and any signature belong to the preceptor and faculty. If your preceptor prefers to discuss changes in person, record the outcome of that conversation in whatever form your course requires.