NU298 Unit 2 Capstone Problem Statement Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Capstone Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NU298 Unit 2 problem statement narrows unnecessary fasting on a composite 30-bed medical unit, in three visible steps, until it can be measured. It comes from Purdue Global NU 298, the capstone course in the BSN. The focus moves from patients going hungry to fasting before procedures, then to procedures with sedation or contrast, then to clear liquids, where the gap between practice and guidance is widest. A four-week record review sets the baseline: a median of 13.5 hours without clear liquids before procedures starting near 1330, with about one in five fasts wasted. A PICOT question, significance shown by arithmetic, a balancing measure and an eight-week deadline complete it.

CourseNU298 Capstone
UnitUnit 2
Paper typeCapstone problem statement
LengthAbout 470 words, 4 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBSN (prelicensure)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NU298 Unit 2

1

One Unit, One Kind of Order, One Number and One Deadline: A Capstone Problem Statement Narrowing Unnecessary Fasting on a Composite 30-Bed Medical Unit Until It Can Be Measured, With a PICOT Question and a Balancing Measure

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU298: Capstone

Unit 2 Problem Statement

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The unit and baseline figures are composite and bracketed; published figures are from the cited studies, and any change requires the provider, anesthesia and unit leadership.

What this part is doingThe problem is narrowed in visible steps, so the reader can see how a broad topic became a measurable one.
2

Three Narrowings, Shown

From "patients go hungry in hospital" to fasting before procedures, because procedures cause most fasting orders on medical units (Sorita et al., 2017). From all procedures to those done with moderate sedation or imaging with contrast, the largest group on this unit. From fasting in general to fasting from clear liquids, because national anesthesia guidance permits clear fluids up to roughly two hours ahead of most sedated or contrast procedures (Joshi et al., 2023), so this is where the gap between practice and evidence is largest.

Baseline, With Its Sources

A four-week review of the unit's records found [62] fasting orders for procedures. Median time from last clear liquid to procedure start: [13.5] hours. Procedures canceled or postponed after a full fast: [12] of [62], about [19] percent, in line with the one in five reported in a study of medical inpatients (Sorita et al., 2017). Median procedure start time: [1330].

PICOT

In adult medical inpatients awaiting procedures with sedation or contrast (P), does a nurse-driven clear-liquids-until-two-hours protocol with a procedure-time confirmation call (I), compared with routine nothing-by-mouth-after-midnight orders (C), reduce the median clear-liquid fasting time (O) over eight weeks (T)?

Thirteen and a half hours without water for a test that begins after lunch is not caution; it is habit.

Why Clear Liquids, Not Food

Solid food carries a longer recommended fast, and changing it involves more parties. Clear liquids are where the evidence is strongest, the risk is lowest and the patient's distress is most immediate, since thirst and low blood pressure follow fluid restriction faster than hunger does. Starting with clear liquids lets the unit test the process before taking on anything harder.

What this part is doingThe scope choice is defended by risk and evidence, which is what makes the narrowed problem credible.
3

Significance From Arithmetic

At about [15] procedure fasts a week and an average excess of [11] hours of fasting from clear liquids beyond what guidance requires, the unit produces about [165] patient-hours of unnecessary thirst every week. Each canceled procedure means the fast is repeated the next day.

The Measure That Guards the Change

Primary measure: median clear-liquid fasting time. Balancing measure: any procedure delayed or canceled because a patient was not fasting long enough, and any aspiration event reported during sedation. If shorter fasts led to delays or aspiration, the change would be stopped.

What this part is doingA balancing measure is named in advance, which shows the student understands that a safety change can create new risks.
4

Deadline

Results are reviewed at eight weeks, against the baseline median.

5

References

Joshi, G. P., Abdelmalak, B. B., Weigel, W. A., Harbell, M. W., Kuo, C. I., Soriano, S. G., Stricker, P. A., Tipton, T., Grant, M. D., Marbella, A. M., Agarkar, M., Blanck, J. F., & Domino, K. B. (2023). 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists practice guidelines for preoperative fasting: Carbohydrate-containing clear liquids with or without protein, chewing gum, and pediatric fasting duration: A modular update of the 2017 American Society of Anesthesiologists practice guidelines for preoperative fasting. Anesthesiology, 138(2), 132-151. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004381

Sorita, A., Thongprayoon, C., Ratelle, J. T., Bates, R. E., Rieck, K. M., Devalapalli, A. P., Ahmed, A., & Kashiwagi, D. T. (2017). Characteristics and outcomes of fasting orders among medical inpatients. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 12(1), 36-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2674

Reading the NU 298 Unit 2 instructions

Unit 2 commonly asks students to turn the capstone topic into a formal problem statement. Prompts usually want the problem narrowed to a specific population and setting, a baseline with its source, a PICOT question, the significance of the problem and the measures that will show change. Instructors look for narrowing that is shown rather than assumed, local data alongside published figures, a PICOT whose parts match the rest of the statement and a balancing measure that guards against harm from the change. A deadline for evaluation is often expected. Problem statements typically run one to two pages, citing the guideline and the studies that frame the baseline in APA 7.

How this NU298 Unit 2 example is built

The statement begins by narrowing the topic in three steps, each with a reason, citing a study of fasting orders among medical inpatients and the national fasting guideline. A baseline from a four-week record review follows, set beside published figures. The PICOT appears next, followed by the highlighted sentence about habit. A section explains why clear liquids rather than food, with a margin note. Significance is calculated in patient-hours of unnecessary thirst. The primary and balancing measures are defined, with a margin note on safety. A short line sets the eight-week review against the baseline median. Every local figure is bracketed so the reader can tell composite data from published data.

NU298 Unit 2 rubric: what earns full points

Problem statement rubrics in NU 298 tend to award points for focus, baseline data, PICOT quality, significance, measurement and writing. Focus points depend on narrowing shown step by step. Baseline points go to local data with its source and comparison to published figures. PICOT points reward each element stated precisely and consistently with the rest of the statement. Significance points are earned by showing the size of the problem, here in hours of unnecessary fasting each week. Measurement points require a primary measure and a balancing measure. Writing points cover clarity and citations. Statements that explain why the narrowest version was chosen usually score higher than those that simply narrow.

NU298 Unit 2 help: mistakes that cost points

Problem statements often lose points by staying broad, such as improving nutrition in hospitalized patients, which cannot be measured in eight weeks. Another common mistake is a PICOT whose outcome differs from the measure described elsewhere. Some students give no baseline or use only national figures. Others forget a balancing measure, leaving no way to show the change was safe. Narrow in steps and say why, collect a local baseline, write a PICOT that matches your measures, show significance with simple arithmetic, add a measure that would reveal harm and set a deadline. Keep the problem to one unit and one order type. A statement that fits on one page is easier for a manager to approve.

Get an NU298 Unit 2 example written to your instructions

Narrowing is the whole job here. Attach the Unit 2 instructions and grading criteria, the topic the proposal settled on and whatever baseline figures can be shared in general terms, and say whether the course wants PICOT, PICO or a narrative form. Back comes a statement with a measurable outcome and a timeframe, figures bracketed; the first custom sample is free, 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More NU298 papers and BSN samples

NU298 Unit 2 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NU298 Unit 2 sample paper?

This page holds the full NU298 Unit 2 problem statement narrowing fasting orders on a composite medical unit to a measurable PICOT, with baseline, significance, a balancing measure and two sources. Send us your topic and we can help you narrow it.

What is a PICOT question in NU298 Unit 2?

Here it pairs medical inpatients awaiting sedated or contrast procedures with a two-hour clear-liquid protocol and time check, set against midnight fasting, judged by median clear-liquid fasting hours after eight weeks.

What is a balancing measure?

A measure that would show if the change caused harm, such as procedures delayed for too short a fast or any aspiration during sedation.

How long can patients drink clear liquids before sedation?

National anesthesia guidance allows clear liquids until about two hours before most elective procedures for healthy patients, with exceptions set by the provider.

Why narrow to clear liquids first?

The evidence is strongest, the risk lowest and the patient's distress most immediate, so it is the safest place to start a change.