NU144CL Unit 5 Clinical Journal Reflection Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Medical-Surgical Nursing II Clinical Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NU144CL Unit 5 clinical journal examines a single decision: a composite student who kept working for twenty minutes before telling the assigned nurse that two medication passes were running late after a new admission arrived. The entry was prepared for Purdue Global NU 144CL, Medical-Surgical Nursing II Clinical, a BSN clinical course. It follows Johns' model of structured reflection, asking what the student was trying to achieve, which was to appear capable, and what that cost. Internal factors are kept apart from external ones. Two earlier moments to speak are compared, and the learning becomes a fixed checkpoint: a status report to the assigned nurse at 0845 every shift, whether behind or not.

CourseNU144CL Medical-Surgical Nursing II Clinical
UnitUnit 5
Paper typeClinical journal
LengthAbout 820 words, 5 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBSN (prelicensure)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NU144CL Unit 5

1

Twenty Minutes Too Long to Say I Was Behind: A Clinical Journal Using Johns' Model of Structured Reflection on a Composite Morning When Two Medication Passes Ran Late and a New Admission Arrived

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU144CL: Medical-Surgical Nursing II Clinical

Unit 5 Clinical Journal

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The shift, patients and staff are composite; times are bracketed where illustrative, and no patient was harmed in the events described.

What this part is doingThe journal follows one decision rather than the whole shift, which is what gives it enough depth to change something.
2

Description

At [0845], I had given morning medications to two of my four patients. The other two, [Mr. K.] in room 14 and [Mrs. L.] in room 16, had scheduled medications at [0900], including Mr. K.'s metoprolol and Mrs. L.'s antibiotic. At [0850] a new patient was admitted to room 15, also on my assignment, and my nurse asked me to help with the admission while she finished a dressing elsewhere. I took the new patient's vital signs, started the admission questions and kept going. I knew the two medication passes were getting close to the end of their window, but I did not say so. At [0925] I finally told my nurse. She came at once, and both medications were given at [0935] and [0945], at the edge of the window the facility allows for scheduled doses that are not time-critical (Institute for Safe Medication Practices, 2011).

Reflection: My Aim in That Moment

I wanted to look capable. My nurse had trusted me with the admission, and saying I was behind felt like admitting I could not handle four patients. I also wanted to finish the admission questions in one sitting, since the patient was tired and I did not want to make him repeat himself.

I protected how I looked to my nurse at the cost of two doses arriving at the edge of their window, and the patients carried that cost, not me.

Why Did I Act as I Did?

I thought I could finish the admission and then catch up. I was underestimating how long admission questions take with a patient who is short of breath and needs pauses.

What Were the Consequences?

For Mr. K., the metoprolol was given late, and his heart rate at [0930] was [98], higher than his usual [80]s. For Mrs. L., the antibiotic was given later than scheduled, which for some antibiotics can matter for keeping blood levels steady. Neither patient was harmed, but both doses were later than they should have been. My nurse also lost the chance to plan around the problem twenty minutes earlier.

How Did I Feel, and How Did Others Feel?

I felt embarrassed when I told her, and then relieved. She was not angry; she said she would rather know at [0855] than at [0925]. The new patient, I later realized, would have been fine pausing his admission for ten minutes.

Influencing Factors

Internal: wanting to appear capable, not wanting to interrupt a nurse who was busy, and a belief that asking for help is a sign of weakness in a student. External: an admission nobody had planned for, arriving right before a medication time, and no set point in the shift when I was expected to report my status.

What this part is doingInternal and external factors are kept apart, which shows which of them the student can actually change.
3

Could I Have Dealt With It Better?

I can see two earlier moments to speak. At [0850], when the admission arrived, I could have said: "I can start the admission, but I have [0900] meds due for rooms 14 and 16. Should I give those first?" That would have taken ten seconds. At [0905], when I noticed the time, I could have stepped out and told her. Either would have kept both doses on time. The first would have been better, because it let my nurse decide with all the information.

What this part is doingTwo specific earlier moments are named and compared, so the alternative is something the writer could actually have done.
4

Learning

Being capable is not the same as doing everything alone; it includes knowing when a plan has stopped working and saying so early. Reflection on a single decision helps me find the habit behind it, which a summary of the whole shift would hide (Johns, 2017). Communicating status clearly and early is part of safe care, as much as any skill I perform (Potter et al., 2023).

What I Will Do

At [0845] every shift, whether I am behind or not, I will give my assigned nurse a short status report: which medications are given, which are due and anything that could get in the way. When something new is added to my assignment, I will say what it will push back before I start it. My instructor can watch for both, and I will note in my next journal whether I did them.

The Question I Am Left With

I cannot yet judge the line between a delay I should report and one I can handle. I plan to ask my nurse what she wants to hear and when, so that I do not swing from saying too little to interrupting her with everything.

5

References

Institute for Safe Medication Practices. (2011). Acute care guidelines for timely administration of scheduled medications. Institute for Safe Medication Practices.

Johns, C. (2017). Becoming a reflective practitioner (5th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.

Potter, P. A., Perry, A. G., Stockert, P. A., & Hall, A. M. (2023). Fundamentals of nursing (11th ed.). Elsevier.

The Purdue Global NU144CL Unit 5 instructions

Unit 5 commonly asks for a clinical journal entry that uses a recognized reflective model to examine an event from a recent shift. Many sections name Gibbs, Johns or Rolfe, and students are expected to follow the model's stages rather than simply tell a story. Instructors look for one specific event, an honest account of the student's own thinking and feelings, the factors that shaped the decision and a change specific enough to be watched. Entries are written in the first person and keep patient details composite. Most run one and a half to three pages. Evidence or a professional standard should support the learning, cited in APA 7 at the end.

How the NU 144CL Unit 5 example is put together

The journal opens with a plain description of the morning, from the 0845 status of four patients to the late doses at 0935 and 0945, citing safe medication practice guidance for scheduled-dose windows. The reflection section names the aim, to look capable, with a highlighted line on who carried the cost. Consequences for each patient and for the nurse follow. Feelings are described briefly, including the nurse's reply. Influencing factors are split into internal and external lists. Two earlier moments to speak are compared, with a margin note on why the first was better. The learning cites Johns and a fundamentals text, and the action is a daily status report.

NU144CL Unit 5 rubric: what earns full points

Journal rubrics in NU 144CL typically give points for description, faithful use of the chosen model, how deeply the analysis goes, learning linked to evidence and a plan for future practice. Description points need enough detail to follow the event without unnecessary narration. Model points are earned by working through its stages in order. Depth points reward honesty about motives, here the wish to appear capable, and a clear separation of internal from external factors. Learning points require a source that supports the insight. Plan points go to an action that is specific, repeatable and observable by an instructor. Entries that compare real alternatives at named moments tend to earn the most for analysis.

NU144CL Unit 5 help: mistakes that cost points

Clinical journals commonly lose points by covering a whole shift in summary, leaving no room for analysis. Another frequent weakness is skipping the student's own motives and blaming the workload alone. Some entries use a reflective model's headings without answering its questions. Others end with a vague resolution, such as "I will communicate better." Choose one decision, describe it briefly, follow your model's stages, name what you were trying to achieve and what it cost, separate what you can change from what you cannot, compare two moments when you could have acted differently and finish with an action your instructor could see you do on the next shift.

Get an NU144CL Unit 5 example written to your instructions

Which moment will the Unit 5 journal examine? Describe it in a general sentence, and name the reflective framework required, Johns, Gibbs or another, alongside the rubric. An invented moment of the same kind is then worked through the framework's own headings, while your own shift stays out of it. First custom sample free, back in 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More NU144CL papers and BSN samples

NU144CL Unit 5 questions, answered

Where can I find a free NU144CL Unit 5 sample paper?

A complete NU144CL Unit 5 clinical journal is here, using Johns' model to examine a twenty-minute delay in reporting late medications, with internal and external factors, two alternatives, a checkpoint and three sources. We can help you structure a journal around your own event.

What is Johns' model of structured reflection?

A set of cue questions that guide the writer through the event, their aims, the consequences, feelings, influencing factors, alternatives and learning, so reflection goes beyond describing what happened.

Why focus on one decision in the NU144CL Unit 5 journal?

One decision can be examined in depth, including motives and alternatives. A summary of a whole shift leaves too little space to find the habit behind it.

What counts as an observable change?

An action an instructor could see, such as a status report to the assigned nurse at a set time every shift. Vague goals like communicating better cannot be checked.

Is it acceptable to admit a mistake in a clinical journal?

Yes. Journals are graded on honest analysis and learning, and a well-examined error usually earns more credit than a shift described as flawless.