| Course | NU140 Nursing Fundamentals |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 10 |
| Paper type | Final care plan |
| Length | About 890 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BSN (prelicensure) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NU140 Unit 10
Fluids First, Then Pain, Then Food: A Final Care Plan Ranking Three Nursing Diagnoses for a Composite 58-Year-Old Woman Admitted With Gallstone Pancreatitis, Worked Through to Evaluation and Revision
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NU140: Nursing Fundamentals
Unit 10 Final Care Plan
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The patient is composite; values and volumes are bracketed where illustrative, and medical orders are the provider's.
The Patient
[Mrs. C.], a composite 58-year-old school bus driver, arrived by ambulance doubled over with upper abdominal pain boring through to her back, which began after a large dinner. She has vomited five times. Her heart rate is [118], blood pressure [102/64], temperature [37.9] C, and respirations [22]. Her mucous membranes are dry, and she has passed little urine since morning. Her lipase is [1,480] U/L, far above the laboratory's range, and an ultrasound shows gallstones. She rates her pain [9] out of 10 and lies curled on her side. Her provider has ordered nothing by mouth, IV fluids, IV pain medicine and close monitoring.
Assessment Summary
The key cues are signs of fluid loss and shift (fast pulse, lower blood pressure, dry mouth, low urine output, vomiting), severe pain, and an inability to eat. In acute pancreatitis, inflammation makes blood vessels leak, and large volumes of fluid can move out of the circulation into the tissues around the pancreas, so a patient can be dangerously low on circulating volume even before much fluid is visibly lost. Early, adequate IV fluid is a central part of treatment in the first day (Tenner et al., 2013).
Ranking the Diagnoses
1. Deficient fluid volume related to vomiting and fluid shift from inflamed tissues, as evidenced by tachycardia, low blood pressure for her, dry mucous membranes and low urine output. It ranks first because falling circulating volume threatens perfusion to the kidneys, brain and heart and can progress to shock.
2. Acute pain related to pancreatic inflammation, as evidenced by a rating of 9, guarding and a curled position. It ranks second: it is severe and must be treated promptly, and pain also raises heart rate and breathing, but it is not immediately life-threatening in the way volume loss is.
3. Inadequate nutritional intake, linked to the nothing-by-mouth order and repeated vomiting. It ranks third because nutrition can safely wait a short time while fluid and pain are addressed, and early feeding is started as soon as she can tolerate it.
Pain is the problem she would rank first; fluid is the problem that can harm her fastest, and the plan explains that difference to her.
Diagnosis One: Deficient Fluid Volume
Outcome: within 12 hours, heart rate below [100], systolic blood pressure above [110], urine of [35] mL or more each hour, and moist mucous membranes. Interventions and rationales: give IV fluids at the prescribed rate and monitor response, because early adequate fluid replacement supports perfusion in pancreatitis; measure vital signs hourly at first, because rising heart rate or falling pressure signals worsening deficit; record intake and output hourly with a urine meter if ordered, because urine output reflects kidney perfusion; listen to lung sounds and watch for breathlessness, because aggressive fluids can cause overload; check laboratory results such as hematocrit and BUN as ordered, because rising values suggest continuing deficit.
Diagnosis Two: Acute Pain
Outcome: pain rating of [4] or less within one hour of each dose, and ability to rest and change position. Interventions and rationales: give IV analgesics as prescribed and reassess within an hour, because pancreatitis pain is severe and undertreated pain increases stress responses; help her into a position of comfort, often sitting up and leaning forward or lying on her side with knees bent, because these positions can ease tension on the inflamed area; keep the environment quiet and explain each procedure, because anxiety heightens pain.
Diagnosis Three: Imbalanced Nutrition
Outcome: tolerates a low-fat diet within [48] to [72] hours without increased pain or vomiting. Interventions and rationales: maintain nothing by mouth as ordered while vomiting continues, with frequent mouth care, because oral comfort matters when she cannot drink; give antiemetics as prescribed; when her pain eases and vomiting stops, start oral intake as ordered with small low-fat meals, because early feeding is now preferred in mild pancreatitis when tolerated (Tenner et al., 2013); weigh daily.
Evaluation and Revision
At 12 hours, the fluid outcome was partly met: her heart rate fell to [96] and urine output reached [0.6] mL per kilogram per hour, but she developed crackles at both lung bases and her breathing rate rose to [26]. The provider was notified, the fluid rate was reduced, and oxygen was started; the plan was revised to add four-hourly lung assessment and daily weights to detect overload. Pain outcomes were met after the second dose, with ratings of [3] to [4]. By day three she tolerated clear liquids and then a low-fat diet. A new teaching need was added: preparing her for a planned gallbladder removal during this admission, since gallstones caused the attack and may cause another (Potter et al., 2023).
Summary
The plan shows why the patient's most pressing complaint is not always the first priority, how each problem's outcome guides evaluation, and why a care plan is revised as the patient changes. Using standard diagnoses keeps the ranking clear to the whole team (Herdman et al., 2024).
References
Herdman, T. H., Kamitsuru, S., & Takáo Lopes, C. (Eds.). (2024). NANDA International nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification, 2024-2026 (13th ed.). Thieme.
Potter, P. A., Perry, A. G., Stockert, P. A., & Hall, A. M. (2023). Fundamentals of nursing (11th ed.). Elsevier.
Tenner, S., Baillie, J., DeWitt, J., & Vege, S. S. (2013). American College of Gastroenterology guideline: Management of acute pancreatitis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 108(9), 1400-1415. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2013.218
What the NU140 Unit 10 assignment asks for
Unit 10 usually asks for a care plan covering a patient with several problems, so prioritization is graded alongside the five phases. Prompts typically want a full assessment summary, two or three nursing diagnoses ranked with reasons, measurable outcomes, interventions with rationales for each, and an evaluation that leads to revision. Five pages or more is common. Instructors look for a ranking that follows a recognized framework and explains why the patient's loudest complaint may not come first. Each diagnosis should have its own outcome so it can be evaluated. Strong plans show evaluation discovering something new, including complications of treatment, and revising the plan in response. Patient preferences and teaching needs often belong in the plan as well.
How this NU140 Unit 10 example is built
The plan opens with the patient's presentation, vital signs, laboratory and imaging results and medical orders. An assessment summary explains why fluid shifts out of the circulation in pancreatitis, citing the guideline. The ranking section defends the order of the three diagnoses, with the highlighted line on the difference between her priority and the nurse's. Each diagnosis then gets an outcome and interventions with rationales: fluids and monitoring, analgesia and positioning, and nothing by mouth with early feeding when tolerated. The evaluation reports partial success with fluids, new crackles and a revised plan, pain controlled, diet resumed and surgery teaching added. A short summary closes it. A margin note marks the moment evaluation uncovers a complication.
NU140 Unit 10 rubric: what earns full points
Final care plans in NU 140 are typically graded on assessment, prioritization, outcomes, interventions with rationales, and evaluation with revision. Assessment credit goes to a summary that identifies the key cues. Prioritization is weighted heavily and rewards an order that follows a recognized framework with an explanation for each position. Outcomes must be measurable and specific to each diagnosis. Rationales should explain why each intervention works for this condition and patient, supported by evidence. Evaluation earns the most when it reports data, identifies new problems and revises the plan accordingly. Sources in APA 7 and a consistent format across all three diagnoses help the grader follow the reasoning.
Common NU140 Unit 10 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Final plans often rank pain first because it is what the patient feels most, without considering threats to circulation. Another common problem is one shared outcome for all diagnoses, which makes evaluation impossible. Some plans list interventions copied from a textbook without rationales tied to the patient. Many end with all goals met and no revision, even when the case gives reason to change course. Rank by threat to life and explain it, give each diagnosis its own measurable outcome, link every intervention to its rationale, report actual results at evaluation, look for complications of treatment, and revise the plan when the patient changes. Finally, add teaching for what comes after discharge, such as planned surgery.
Get an NU140 Unit 10 example written to your instructions
For the final plan, the case, the template, the rubric and any required number of diagnoses are what matter. Earlier NU140 plans you share can be built on rather than repeated. The draft carries prioritization reasoning and in-text citations throughout, is free the first time, and reaches you in 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More NU140 papers and BSN samples
- NU140 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- NU140 Unit 2: Skills Documentation
- NU140 Unit 3: Care Plan
- NU140 Unit 4: Safety Analysis
- NU140 Unit 5: Case Study Analysis
- NU140 Unit 6: Teaching Plan
- NU140 Unit 7: Skills Documentation
- NU140 Unit 8: Case Study Analysis
- NU140 Unit 9: Reflection
- NU108 Unit 10: Final Reflection Paper
- NU104 Unit 10: Final Synthesis Paper
NU140 Unit 10 questions, answered
Where can I find a free NU140 Unit 10 sample paper?
The complete NU140 Unit 10 final care plan for gallstone pancreatitis is on this page, with three ranked diagnoses, outcomes, interventions with rationales, evaluation and revision, with three references. Send your final case and we can prepare a ranked plan.
Why is fluid volume ranked above pain in NU140 Unit 10?
In pancreatitis, fluid shifts out of the circulation and vomiting adds losses, so falling volume threatens perfusion to vital organs and can progress to shock. Pain is severe but not immediately life-threatening.
What position helps pancreatitis pain?
Sitting up and leaning forward, or lying on the side with knees bent, can ease tension on the inflamed area. The sample uses positioning alongside prescribed IV analgesics.
Why did the plan need revision?
At twelve hours the patient developed crackles and faster breathing from the IV fluids. The provider reduced the rate, oxygen was started, and lung checks and daily weights were added to the plan.
When can a pancreatitis patient eat again?
When pain eases and vomiting stops, oral intake is started as ordered, often with small low-fat meals. Early feeding is now preferred in mild pancreatitis when the patient tolerates it.