NS499 Unit 3 Needs Assessment for Crew Lunches Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Bachelor's Capstone in Nutrition Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Existing records come first in this NS499 Unit 3 needs assessment, which then adds an anonymous questionnaire answered by 58 of 94 crew members, two days of cab temperature readings and an audit of seven gas stations near a composite builder's subdivisions. Purdue Global NS 499, Bachelor's Capstone in Nutrition, asks BS in Nutrition Science students to assess their population before designing anything. The summer schedule, the first-aid log and the company's water program show what was already known. The questionnaire finds two thirds buying meals at gas stations and only 8 of 27 regular packers using ice, with spoilage named as the main barrier. Cabs read 118 to 127 degrees by lunch, and an adapted store measure finds fresh fruit at two of seven stores. Needs, strengths, limits and implications close it.

CourseNS499 Bachelor's Capstone in Nutrition
UnitUnit 3
Paper typeNeeds assessment
LengthAbout 1,120 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Nutrition Science
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NS499 Unit 3

1

What the Company Already Knew: A Unit 3 Needs Assessment of Packed Lunches, Gas Station Meals and Hot Cabs on a Home Builder's Job Sites

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NS499: Bachelor's Capstone in Nutrition

Unit 3 Needs Assessment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Mabry Homes, its records, its questionnaire results and the store audit are composite; the vehicle heat study, food safety guidance and store measure cited are real.

What this part is doingLeading with existing records shows the assessment respected what the organization already knew before collecting anything new.
2

Purpose and Questions

This assessment asks three questions about the 94 field employees on Mabry Homes' framing and trim crews. How do crew members get their on-duty meals from May through September? What happens to food that is packed at home? What do the stores near the job sites offer in place of a packed lunch? The answers decide whether the program proposed in Unit 2 targets the right problem.

Existing Records

Three sources already existed. The first is the summer schedule. Crews start at 6:00 a.m., take a fifteen-minute break at about 8:30 and lunch at about 10:30, and leave at 2:30 p.m. Each crew has a company pickup, and most workers also drive their own vehicles to the lot.

The second is the safety office's first-aid log. Last summer it recorded nine visits for nausea or stomach upset among field employees. The log does not record a cause, and some of those visits were probably heat strain, so this figure cannot show that food made anyone sick. It does show that stomach complaints were common enough to note.

The third is the company's heat illness program. Every crew truck carries a 10-gallon water cooler refilled with ice each morning, and superintendents enforce water breaks. Hydration is therefore already addressed, and this assessment leaves it aside.

Questionnaire Method

An eight-item questionnaire in English and Spanish went out on paper during each subdivision's Monday safety briefing and was collected in a sealed box over two weeks. It carried no names and no questions that could identify a worker. The instructor and the safety manager approved it before use. It asked where breakfast and lunch came from on a typical workday, whether the worker owned and used a cooler with ice, where a packed lunch was kept, and what made packing a lunch hard.

Questionnaire Findings

Fifty-eight of 94 crew members answered, a response of 62 percent. Thirty-eight, or 66 percent, bought breakfast or lunch at a gas station on most workdays. Twenty-seven, or 47 percent, packed a lunch from home on at least three days a week. Of those 27, only 8 kept it in a cooler with ice; the rest left it in a bag on the cab floor, on the dashboard or in the truck bed.

Asked what made packing a lunch hard, more respondents chose "it gets hot or spoils by lunch" than chose cost, time or not knowing what to pack.

What this part is doingThe highlighted finding shows the crews themselves named storage as the barrier, which confirms the program's focus with their own words.
3

Written comments added detail. Several workers wrote that they had stopped packing meat or mayonnaise after a lunch "turned." Others said a cooler took up room in a cab shared by three people.

Packers and Buyers Compared

The questionnaire also allowed a rough comparison between the two groups. Workers who bought both meals at a gas station were more likely to describe their breakfast as a pastry, a breakfast taco or an energy drink, and more likely to report buying a second energy drink at the 8:30 break. Workers who packed a lunch more often described sandwiches, rice and beans, leftovers or tortillas with meat, which are exactly the moist, protein-rich foods that support bacterial growth when warm. The comparison suggests the two groups need different help. Buyers need a quicker way to choose at the counter. Packers need a way to keep good food safe. A program that only taught healthier choices would leave the packers' risk untouched, and one that only issued coolers would do nothing for the two thirds who buy.

Eleven respondents who never packed a lunch wrote that they would if the food stayed cold, which suggests the kit could also move some buyers into the packing group.

Cab Temperature Readings

On two clear June days, with the safety manager's approval, I placed an appliance thermometer with a minimum and maximum reading in three crew pickups parked on the lots with windows closed. Outside air reached 91 and 94 degrees Fahrenheit by 10:30 a.m. Inside, the cabs read between 118 and 127 degrees at that time. These readings fit published measurements showing that closed vehicles warm about 40 degrees above outside air on sunny days, mostly within the first half hour (McLaren et al., 2005). By the federal rule, perishable food that sits above 90 degrees has an hour before it must go back in the cold (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2025). A lunch on the cab floor passes that limit by about 7:00 a.m.

Store Audit

The seven gas stations within ten minutes of the three subdivisions were audited once in June, at the hour crews shop, using a short checklist adapted from a published measure of food store environments (Glanz et al., 2007). Fresh whole fruit was available at two of the seven. Refrigerated sandwiches or wraps were stocked at five. Every store sold bottled water, and every store had a hot case or roller grill. Prices were recorded for twelve common items. The pattern matches research finding limited healthy food in small stores, especially single-aisle ones (Laska et al., 2010).

Summary of Needs

1. Storage. Most packed lunches are kept at temperatures that make perishable food unsafe within hours.

2. Choice at the store. Two thirds of crew members rely on gas stations, where fresh options are limited but refrigerated items exist at most stores.

3. Space. A cooler must fit a shared cab.

Strengths to Build On

The crews already gather every Monday for a paid toolbox talk, already carry ice for water each morning, and nearly half already pack a lunch. The program can add a cold lunch to habits that exist rather than create new ones.

Limitations

The questionnaire reached 62 percent of the population and was answered by workers present at toolbox talks, who may differ from those absent. Cab readings came from three trucks on two days. The store audit was done once. The first-aid log cannot attribute any visit to food.

Implications for the Program

The findings support the Unit 2 focus on keeping packed lunches cold. They also argue for a gas station component, because two thirds of the crews eat there. Bilingual materials are required, since a third of the questionnaires came back in Spanish. The cooler should be compact, and the materials should show where to put it in a cab, out of direct sun.

What this part is doingEnding with implications ties every finding to a design decision for the program plan in later units.
4

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Preventing food poisoning. https://www.cdc.gov/food-safety/prevention/index.html

Glanz, K., Sallis, J. F., Saelens, B. E., & Frank, L. D. (2007). Nutrition Environment Measures Survey in Stores (NEMS-S): Development and evaluation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(4), 282-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.12.019

Laska, M. N., Borradaile, K. E., Tester, J., Foster, G. D., & Gittelsohn, J. (2010). Healthy food availability in small urban food stores: A comparison of four US cities. Public Health Nutrition, 13(7), 1031-1035. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980009992771

McLaren, C., Null, J., & Quinn, J. (2005). Heat stress from enclosed vehicles: Moderate ambient temperatures cause significant temperature rise in enclosed vehicles. Pediatrics, 116(1), e109-e112. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-2368

What the NS499 Unit 3 assignment asks for

In the third NS499 unit, students gather and analyze information about their population's needs. Begin with records that already exist, such as schedules, logs or reports, before collecting new data. Any questionnaire or observation should be approved by the instructor and the organization, carry no identifying details and be described clearly in a methods section. Report response numbers along with percentages. Where possible, use or adapt a published tool rather than inventing one. Present findings by question, then summarize the needs they reveal. Strengths in the population or setting are worth naming because programs build on them. Limitations, such as who did not respond, belong in their own section. The closing section should translate each result into a design choice for the program. A typical assessment fills five to seven pages in APA 7.

How this NS499 Unit 3 example is built

The assessment opens with three questions and then reviews the schedule, the first-aid log and the company's heat program, setting hydration aside because it is already handled. The questionnaire method describes eight bilingual items, a sealed box and approvals. Findings report 58 responses, gas station buying and how few packers use ice, and the highlighted sentence gives the crews' own ranking of barriers. A comparison of packers and buyers shows the two groups need different help. Cab readings are set beside a published vehicle heat study and the federal 1-hour rule. The store audit uses an adapted version of a published store measure. A numbered summary names storage, store choice and cab space as needs. Strengths, limitations and implications for bilingual, compact materials close the document.

NS499 Unit 3 rubric: what earns full points

Needs assessments are graded on method, honesty about the data and how well the findings lead to the program. Using existing records before new collection shows good practice. The methods must be clear enough to repeat, including how privacy was protected. Response numbers matter, since a percentage without a count can mislead. Adapting a published tool earns credit for rigor. Findings should answer the stated questions directly. The rubric often rewards naming strengths as well as needs. Limitations should be specific to this data, such as a small number of readings. The implications section links the evidence to design choices, which is what later units build on. Readable lists or tables help the grader, and the final NS499 assessment points go to APA 7 references.

NS499 Unit 3 help from the desk

Many needs assessments jump straight to a survey without checking what the organization already knows. Others report percentages without the number who answered. Questionnaires sometimes ask for names or details that could identify a coworker. Findings are presented as a list of numbers with no link to the program. Some writers claim a cause the data cannot show, such as linking first-aid visits to food. Strengths are rarely mentioned. Limitations are generic. Implications are left for later units, so the assessment reads as unfinished. If you have data from your setting but are unsure how to present it, a writer can build the assessment around your own figures.

Get an NS499 Unit 3 example written to your instructions

Name the records your setting already keeps, such as sales, sign-ins or survey results, plus anything you are permitted to collect yourself. Include the Unit 3 assessment prompt and rubric. Returned free in 24-48h, the first sample is organized around those sources, with their limits stated beside each finding and the setting's own assets listed. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More NS499 papers and BS in Nutrition Science samples

NS499 Unit 3 questions, answered

Can I survey people at my workplace for this assessment?

Possibly, but only after the instructor and the organization agree, and some sections route even short questionnaires through a formal review. Anonymous formats with no identifying questions keep the privacy issues simple. Where approval is slow, existing records and public data can carry much of the assessment, with the questionnaire described as planned rather than completed.

What is a food environment audit?

It is a structured record of what food is available, and sometimes at what price, in the places a population actually shops or eats. Published checklists exist for stores and restaurants, and they can be adapted to other settings if the changes are explained. Recording the same items at every site makes the results comparable.

How should a low response rate be handled?

Report it plainly and think about who probably answered. A questionnaire left in a break room reaches people who spend time there, which may not represent everyone. Stating that limitation, and avoiding claims about the whole population, is enough for most rubrics. Comparing the respondents with known facts about the group can also help.

Where can I find a free NS499 Unit 3 sample paper?

This page offers a complete NS499 Unit 3 needs assessment for a home builder's crews, using existing records, a 58-response questionnaire, cab temperature readings and a store audit.

Does the NS499 Unit 3 sample claim food made workers sick?

No. The first-aid log recorded nine stomach complaints but no causes, and some were likely heat strain. The assessment says the log cannot attribute any visit to food and uses it only as background.