MT437 · Unit 2

MT437 Unit 2 warehouse flow map example

Strategic Warehouse Management Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Ten touches, seven handoffs and 1,200 feet separate a pallet of ceramic brake pads arriving at Halloran Auto Parts' Chattanooga building from four boxes leaving in a store tote. Each one is recorded in the composite MT437 Unit 2 warehouse flow map, which shows the pads being handled for about 43 minutes while waiting for more than 26 hours.

What this page holds

A single pallet of brake pads, followed from trailer to store tote across eleven steps, supplies the composite flow map written for Unit 2 of MT437. Searches like "mt 437 unit 2 assignment example", "mt437 unit 2 sample" and "mt437 unit 2 example" land here.

What a finished MT437 Unit 2 warehouse flow map looks like

One drawing fills the first page: a plan of the building with receiving doors on the east wall, shipping doors on the west, and a numbered line tracing the pallet. A table gives each of the eleven steps its handler, distance in feet, handling minutes and the wait that follows. Unloading covers 65 feet. The pallet then sits 13.8 hours on the staging floor before a receiver breaks it down to count cartons against the ship notice, restacks it and labels it, after which it waits another 7.2 hours for a reach truck. Putaway travels 430 feet to reserve rack. Replenishment later carts six cartons 290 feet to a forward shelf. After picking, a conveyor carries the tote 210 feet to a check station, and the tote waits 5.6 hours in a store lane before loading.

How a MT437 Unit 2 example is structured

The map follows the goods, not the organization chart, so every line on the drawing is a movement of the same product. Symbols separate a touch, where a person handles the goods, from conveyance and from waiting. Handoffs are marked wherever responsibility passes from one role to another, seven in all, since each is a point where goods can queue. Totals follow the table: 42.7 minutes of handling against 26.6 hours of waiting before storage and after picking, which puts handling at 2.6 percent of the elapsed time. Dock-to-stock is reported separately at 21.4 hours, 98 percent of it spent waiting. Time in reserve storage is stated but kept out of these totals, because it reflects inventory policy rather than flow. The final page names two points where the pallet or tote is handled twice.

Eleven steps, one product

Unloading through trailer loading is drawn as a single line, with each step numbered on both the plan and the table so a reader can move between drawing and figures without losing the thread.

Touch, move or wait

Three symbols carry the whole map. Conveyor travel counts as movement without a touch, which is why eleven steps produce ten touches rather than eleven.

Twenty-one hours to a shelf

Of the 21.4 hours from unloading to putaway, only about 26 minutes involve anyone handling the pallet. The staging floor and the putaway queue hold everything else.

Built twice at receiving

Breaking the pallet down to count cartons and then restacking it is the first double handle. Counting at the door by scanning carton labels would save about 15 minutes per pallet.

Set down, lifted again

Totes placed in the store lane are later restacked onto roll cages. Building cages in the lane removes a touch on every tote, bringing the map from ten touches to eight.

Where marks go in MT437 Unit 2

Flow maps in MT437 are usually judged on whether they follow product rather than people. A drawing of departments connected by arrows looks tidy and shows nothing about where goods pause. Maps without waits draw the heaviest deductions, because waiting is where nearly all of the elapsed time sits and the map exists to reveal it. Distances matter next; a putaway of 430 feet and a replenishment run of 290 feet are the evidence a later layout change will rely on. Instructors look for a legend separating touches from conveyance, since counting a conveyor as handling inflates the labor picture. Storage time mixed into flow time is another common slip that buries the staging delay under days of inventory. Double handles should be named, located and sized, not merely noticed in passing.

Get a MT437 Unit 2 example written to your instructions

Share the floor plan bundled with the Unit 2 case, name the product to be traced, and add the rubric. We return a composite map drawn along the goods' path, with touches, conveyance and waits marked and totaled, plus the double handles located. First custom sample, no charge, within 24-48h.

MT437 Unit 2 questions, answered

What is the difference between a touch and a handoff on a flow map?

A touch is any time a person physically handles the goods: lifting, counting, labeling, placing. A handoff is where responsibility passes from one role to another, such as receiver to putaway driver. One person can make several touches without a handoff. Marking both matters because touches drive labor cost while handoffs are where goods tend to queue.

Should storage time appear on the map?

State it, but keep it apart from flow totals. Days spent in reserve reflect how much inventory the building holds, which is a purchasing and planning decision. Hours on a staging floor or in a putaway queue reflect how the building works. Mixing the two hides the waits a flow map is meant to expose, so a separate line for storage usually satisfies instructors.

My case gives no distances. Can I still map flow?

Yes. Estimate from the floor plan's scale, or count bays and multiply by a stated bay width, and say that is what you did. Where no plan exists, relative distance such as near, middle or far still shows which steps involve long moves. Waits and touches can often be counted even when feet cannot, and they usually carry more weight.