One gym, sixteen teams, a district condition and five late school games: the MT242 Unit 4 facility allocation plan shares twelve weekly hours by stated priority and rotation. Searches like "mt 242 unit 4 assignment example", "mt242 unit 4 sample" and "mt242 unit 4 example" land here.
What a finished MT242 Unit 4 facility allocation plan looks like
Four pages: a demand table, a weekly grid, priority rules and a bump procedure. The demand table sets requests against supply: sixteen teams wanting a full-court hour each is 32 half-court hours against 24, and the district's Monday 6-7 feeder clinic, a condition of the permit, takes two more. The grid gives every team one half-court hour weekly, sixteen in all, and turns the remaining six half-court hours into three full-court scrimmage hours, each shared by two teams, so every team scrimmages full court three or four times across the ten weeks. The 8-9 p.m. hour rotates so no team holds it two weeks running. On the five Tuesdays when school games run to 7:15, displaced practices move into that week's scrimmage hour, posted two weeks ahead.
How a MT242 Unit 4 example is structured
Demand is measured before any hour is assigned, in half-court hours, the unit the curtain creates, so requests and supply can be compared directly and the shortfall stated as a number. Priority rules follow in a fixed order: school events, then the district's clinic, then one weekly practice for every team, then scrimmages, then everything else. Stating that order before the grid lets any conflict be resolved by rule rather than by whoever calls the coordinator first. The grid applies the rules, and the plan explains its one real trade: fewer full-court sessions in exchange for every team practicing every week. Fairness is checked two ways, late slots rotated and scrimmage counts equal for girls' and boys' teams. The bump procedure handles the known disruption, school games running late, and names who posts changes and when. Operational notes on the curtain and the custodian close the plan.
Measured in half-courts
The divider curtain turns each full-court hour into two usable spaces. Counting demand and supply in half-court hours shows the gap plainly: 34 requested, the clinic included, against 24 available each week.
Five priorities, in order
School events first, the permit's feeder clinic second, a weekly practice for every team third, full-court scrimmages fourth, extras last. Any conflict the grid did not foresee is settled by that order, not by negotiation.
Every team, every week
Sixteen half-court hours give each team one practice weekly. The plan argues that steady weekly contact matters more to twelve- and thirteen-year-olds than occasional full-court sessions, and says what that choice costs.
The eight o'clock rotation
The last hour ends near bedtime on a school night. No team holds it two weeks running, and scrimmage counts stay equal between girls' and boys' teams, both checked in a table beneath the grid.
When school games run late
Five Tuesdays have school games scheduled past six. Displaced practices move into that week's scrimmage hour, the coordinator posts the change two weeks ahead, and the custodian's curtain duty is confirmed the same day.
Where marks go in MT242 Unit 4
Allocation plans that assign hours first come, first served, or give every group an equal share regardless of need, miss the Unit 4 task in MT242, which generally wants demand measured and priorities stated before the grid. Grids with no written priority order leave every future conflict to be argued again. Plans also ignore conditions attached to the space itself, a permit requirement, a custodian's hours, a curtain someone must lower, and fail on the first night. Known disruptions such as school events running late deserve a procedure, not a hope. Fairness claimed without a check, late slots and full-court time counted by team, is hard to credit. Plans that hide the trade-off they made, fewer full-court sessions for weekly contact, give up the chance to defend it.
Get a MT242 Unit 4 example written to your instructions
Describe the space your Unit 4 plan must share, a gym, a field complex, a pool, an ice sheet, and the groups competing for it, with any rules the owner attaches. Add the prompt and rubric. The first custom plan, free and ready in 24-48h, measures demand against supply, states priorities in order and handles the disruptions you already know about.
MT242 Unit 4 questions, answered
How should competing groups be prioritized in a facility plan?
By a written order agreed before the schedule is built, usually starting with the facility owner's own needs and any conditions of use, then the program's core activity, then secondary uses. The order should reflect the program's purpose, and the plan should say why. A stated rule settles later conflicts quickly and makes decisions defensible when a group feels shortchanged.
Why measure facility demand in half-courts or lanes rather than hours?
Because the usable unit is often smaller than the whole facility. A divider curtain, lane lines or field partitions let two groups use one space at once, and counting in those units shows true capacity. The example's shortfall looks different in full-court hours than in half-court hours, and only the second matches how the gym is actually used.
What belongs in a bump procedure?
Who decides that a booking is displaced, where the displaced group goes, who tells them and how far in advance. Where the disruption is predictable, such as a published school game schedule, the change can be posted weeks ahead. Unpredictable bumps need a named decision-maker and a default destination, so nobody improvises at six in the evening.