Push against pull for a Tacoma coffee-roaster workshop eyeing Colombia, argued in a finished MT220 discussion board post, Unit 1, and tested by a pair of replies. Searches like "mt 220 unit 1 assignment example", "mt220 unit 1 sample" and "mt220 unit 1 example" land here.
What a finished MT220 Unit 1 discussion board post looks like
About 330 words of opening post with two cited sources, then two replies near 120 words apiece. Paragraph one introduces the firm plainly: a composite shop of [22] people building 12-kilo drum roasters, US sales flat for three years as cafe openings slowed, and [40] unsolicited inquiries from Colombian growers in the past year, mostly from the coffee axis around Manizales and Pereira. A short table follows with two columns, push and pull. Push holds slowing domestic demand and a welding crew idle one day in five. Pull holds Colombian farms roasting their own beans for sale at home, domestic coffee drinking that the national growers' federation has promoted for years, and a trade agreement that removed most duties on US machinery. The closing paragraph ranks the motives by how long each would last.
How a MT220 Unit 1 example is structured
The post argues rather than lists. Its opening sentence commits to a claim, that the pull outweighs the push, so every later line either supports or complicates it. The table keeps each motive to one line with a source or a figure beside it, since a motive without evidence reads as a wish. The ranking paragraph then applies a single test: which motive would still hold in five years. Idle capacity fails because a second US product line could absorb it, while growers who roast at origin represent a shift in where value is added along the coffee chain, which the post supports with a trade press article and a federation report. A final sentence names the motive the writer distrusts, the inquiries themselves, since many arrived after one trade fair. Each reply challenges a classmate's ranking, not the classmate's country.
A claim in the first sentence
Pull outweighs push. Putting that ranking at the top gives classmates something to dispute, and it turns the table beneath into evidence for a position rather than an inventory of reasons a firm might travel.
Push and pull, one line each
Flat domestic orders, idle welders and a price war with imported Asian machines sit under push. Origin roasting, rising coffee consumption inside Colombia and duty-free access sit under pull. Each line carries a figure or a citation.
The five-year test
Motives are ranked by durability. Spare capacity is temporary, since a new product could fill it, whereas growers roasting their own harvest reflects a structural change in where the crop is sold, so that motive ranks first.
A motive the post distrusts
Forty inquiries sound like demand until the post notes that most followed a single booth at a coffee fair in Bogota. It labels them a lead list rather than market evidence and says what would confirm them.
Replies aimed at rankings
The first reply asks whether a classmate's Texas brewery moved into Mexico because of Mexican demand or a saturated home market. The other questions a post that ranked tax incentives first without naming the tax or the country offering it.
Where marks go in MT220 Unit 1
Most Unit 1 posts in MT220 that lose credit do so by listing every textbook motive, market seeking, efficiency, resources, risk spreading, without saying which one applies to the firm named. A post with no firm at all fares worse, since the prompt in many sections asks about a specific company. Motives stated without a figure or a source draw the next deduction; growth in foreign demand is a claim, and graders expect it supported. Posts that treat an idle factory as a strategy tend to be questioned, because spare capacity explains why a firm is willing to sell abroad, not why a market wants what it makes. Replies are counted separately in many sections. One that merely adds another motive earns little, while one that challenges a ranking with a reason collects most of the participation credit.
Get a MT220 Unit 1 example written to your instructions
Tell us which company your Unit 1 prompt names, or note that the choice is still yours, and paste the discussion instructions with the rubric. A custom post ranks that firm's reasons for going abroad, replies included when your section scores them, and returns within 24-48h. The first is free, and a motive you already favor stays on top if the evidence holds.
MT220 Unit 1 questions, answered
Does the Unit 1 post have to name a specific company?
Most MT220 prompts expect one, and a named firm makes the motives testable. A small or composite company works if the post says so and keeps the market facts real. Picking a firm already selling abroad also works: the post then asks why it went and whether that reason still holds, which gives the ranking something to measure.
What is the difference between push and pull motives?
Push motives come from home: a slowing market, spare capacity, a rival taking share. Pull motives come from the foreign market: rising demand, lower trade barriers, customers asking for the product. Push explains willingness to go, and pull explains where. Posts built on push alone rarely show why one country beats another, which later units will ask.
Should the post already pick a target country?
Only lightly. Unit 1 concerns motive, and many sections leave the country decision to Unit 2. Naming the market the inquiries came from is fine, since the pull motives depend on it, but a full country argument at this point uses space the prompt reserved for motive and gets ahead of the next assignment.