MT140 Unit 5 Staffing Case Analysis Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Introduction to Management Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This MT140 Unit 5 staffing case analysis asks why a composite school portrait company hired twenty-four seasonal photographers for the fall and lost nine before September 15, seven of them in their first two weeks. Purdue Global MT 140 brings hiring, training and placement into Unit 5, and the sample walks the position through every staffing stage in order. A posting written for creative photographers hides the 6:00 a.m. van loading, 55 pounds of gear and a child every 25 seconds. Portfolio reviews test the wrong skill, training lasts one afternoon, and new hires start in kindergarten lines. Premack and Wanous on realistic previews, Schmidt and Hunter on work samples and Bauer and colleagues on newcomer adjustment carry the evidence. The case is part of the BS in Business Administration.

CourseMT140 Introduction to Management
UnitUnit 5
Paper typeStaffing case analysis
LengthAbout 1,110 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MT140 Unit 5

1

Nine Seasonal Photographers Gone by Mid-September: A Unit 5 Staffing Case Analysis

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

MT140: Introduction to Management

Unit 5 Staffing Case Analysis

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Larkspur School Portraits, its hiring process and every figure are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingStating the turnover figure and the timing in the lead points the analysis toward the early stages of the staffing process.
2

The Case

Larkspur School Portraits hires seasonal photographers each summer to cover fall picture days from mid-August through October. Last year it hired twenty-four. Nine left by September 15, seven of them in their first two weeks of shooting. The posted job description, written years ago, called the job "seasonal photographer" and listed "photographing students in a school setting, flexible schedule, photography experience a plus." Exit comments from six of the nine mentioned early starts, heavy equipment and the pace of photographing children.

The Staffing Process

Robbins and Coulter (2021) describe staffing as a sequence: analyzing the job, recruiting candidates, selecting among them, orienting and training new hires, and placing them where they can succeed. I take each stage in turn, comparing what Larkspur did with what the stage requires.

Job Analysis

Larkspur's description omits what drives people away. The job starts at 6:00 a.m., when photographers load about 55 pounds of lights, stands and backdrops into a van. They set up in a gym or library in 30 minutes, then photograph 400 to 700 students at a pace of about one every 25 seconds, many of them kindergartners who will not sit still. The description says "flexible schedule," but picture days cannot move. A proper job analysis would have identified the physical load, the fixed early hours, the pace and the need to work with young children as core requirements.

Recruitment

Larkspur posted the job on a general job board and on a photography forum. The photography forum drew candidates who love photography and expected creative work. The job is closer to a production line with a camera. Recruiting from people who have worked with children in high-volume settings, such as summer camp staff, school aides and youth sports coaches, might have drawn candidates better prepared for the pace.

Selection

Selection relied on a portfolio review and one unstructured interview. Portfolios show creative skill, which the job barely uses. Schmidt and Hunter (1998) brought together 85 years of hiring research and concluded that a standard set of questions asked of every candidate, and a sample of the real work, forecast later performance far better than a free-form conversation does. A short work sample, photographing twenty volunteers in thirty minutes with the company's standard setup, would test the actual job.

What this part is doingComparing what each selection method measures with what the job actually demands shows why the portfolio review misfired.
3

Orientation and Training

New photographers received one afternoon of training on the lighting setup and then shadowed an experienced photographer for one picture day before shooting alone. Nobody showed them how to keep a line of kindergartners moving, how to handle a child who cries, or how to pack the van in the order it unloads. Bauer et al. (2007) found in a meta-analysis that newcomers adjust better when socialization helps them understand their role and feel confident in it, and that this adjustment is linked to lower turnover intentions.

Placement

The most damaging decision came last. Larkspur assigned most new photographers to elementary schools, because those are the most numerous, and gave the high school senior and sports sessions to experienced staff. New hires therefore started with the hardest subjects, the youngest children, on their first days.

The schedule made it worse. Elementary schools are photographed first in the season, because their families order early, so the first two weeks of a new photographer's job were almost entirely kindergarten through fifth grade. A veteran photographer told me that a kindergarten line is the hardest skill in the job and that she spent most of her first season learning it. Larkspur asked new hires to learn it in their first week, alone, at the pace of one child every 25 seconds. Seven of the nine departures happened in exactly that window.

Synthesis

Ranking the failures by how much of the turnover each plausibly explains, the job analysis and the recruitment message come first, because they let people accept a job they did not understand. Exit comments named early starts, equipment and pace, all things the posting did not mention. Placement comes second, because it exposed new hires to the hardest work first. Selection and training matter but would not have prevented people from leaving a job they never expected. Premack and Wanous (1985), combining the early experiments on previews that show the job honestly, reported lower turnover among people who saw them, partly because candidates who would not fit chose not to join.

It is worth asking what the fifteen photographers who stayed had in common, since they show what the process should look for. According to the field supervisors, eleven of the fifteen had worked with groups of children before, as camp counselors, coaches, teachers' aides or parents who volunteered in classrooms. Only six had professional photography experience. The current process screens heavily for the second trait and not at all for the first, which is close to the opposite of what the job rewards.

That observation also changes what the company should look for in an interview. Questions about favorite lenses or editing software tell the interviewer little. Questions about the last time a candidate kept a group of restless children on task, or worked a physically demanding early shift, go straight to the reasons people left.

Seven of the nine who left quit over things the job posting never told them.

Recommendations

First, rewrite the job description and posting to state the 6:00 a.m. starts, the 55 pounds of equipment, the pace and the work with young children, and add a short video of a picture day as a realistic preview. Second, recruit from camp staff, school aides and youth coaches as well as photographers. Third, replace the portfolio review with a thirty-minute work sample and a structured interview. Fourth, extend shadowing to three picture days, including one elementary school, and teach handling young children explicitly. Fifth, start new photographers at middle schools before moving them to elementary schools. The measure is simple: the number of seasonal photographers who leave before October 1.

These changes cost little. Rewriting the posting and filming a short preview take a few days of staff time. The work sample uses equipment the company already owns. Extending shadowing from one day to three costs about two extra paid days per new hire, roughly [$400] each, which is small against the cost of recruiting and training a replacement in September, when the season is already underway and every lost photographer day becomes overtime for someone else.

What this part is doingRanking the failures before recommending fixes keeps the recommendations focused on the stages that explain most of the turnover.
4

References

Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 707-721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707

Premack, S. L., & Wanous, J. P. (1985). A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(4), 706-719. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.4.706

Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2021). Management (15th ed.). Pearson.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262

MT140 Unit 5 instructions, in plain terms

Unit 5 usually presents a staffing problem, often turnover or poor performance among new hires, and asks you to analyze it through the stages of the staffing process. Those stages typically include job analysis, recruitment, selection, orientation and training, and placement, though your text may name them slightly differently. For each stage, compare what the organization did with what good practice requires, then decide which failures explain the problem best. The final section recommends changes a manager could make, ideally without relying only on higher pay. You can work from a case the course supplies or from a situation you know, labeling any inference as an inference. Research on selection methods or realistic job previews strengthens the paper. Most sections expect about four pages and at least three credible sources in APA 7, including the course text.

Inside the MT140 Unit 5 example

The case section sets out the numbers: twenty-four hired, nine gone, seven within two weeks. A short paragraph then frames the staffing sequence from the Robbins and Coulter text. Job analysis comes first and describes the real day, from loading the van at six to photographing hundreds of children before lunch. Recruitment shows that a photography forum attracted people expecting creative work. Selection explains why portfolios mislead and cites Schmidt and Hunter in support of structured questions and a work sample. Orientation notes that no one taught new staff to keep a kindergarten line moving, with Bauer and colleagues on newcomer adjustment. Placement reveals that the youngest subjects went to the newest hires. A synthesis ranks the failures and notes that eleven of the fifteen who stayed had worked with groups of children, and the recommendations add a picture day video preview.

Where the points sit in the MT140 Unit 5 rubric

The core of the score in this analysis is the synthesis. Covering every staffing stage shows coverage, but the higher range goes to papers that rank the failures and explain which ones caused the turnover, as this sample does when it puts the posting and recruitment message first. Each stage should use specific evidence from the case, such as the posting's wording or the length of training, instead of general statements about best practice. Research must be applied to the case, not summarized beside it, so the realistic job preview study should change the recommended posting. Recommendations are judged on whether they match the failures found and whether a manager can carry them out. Graders also look for a cost estimate or a note about feasibility. Clear stage headings and APA 7 references for the four sources complete the paper.

Common MT140 Unit 5 mistakes, and how to avoid them

A common shortcoming in staffing papers is spending equal space on every stage, including ones that worked, which leaves no room for the real cause. Another is recommending higher pay as the main fix, when the assignment asks what the supervisor can change. Some writers describe the stages from the textbook and then mention the case only in the conclusion. Others blame the new hires instead of the process that chose and prepared them. Look closely at the evidence too: exit comments, posting language and training schedules are the facts that make a verdict convincing. If your case gives no reason people left, infer from what it does state and say you are inferring. Our writers can help you sort the case facts by stage, find the research that fits and draft recommendations a manager could approve this season.

Get an MT140 Unit 5 example written to your instructions

Send the Unit 5 case as your section distributed it, or describe a position at your own workplace that keeps turning over, along with the rubric. Each staffing stage gets analyzed against those facts and ranked, with costed recommendations, in 24-48h. As with any first request, the custom sample is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More MT140 papers and BS in Business Administration samples

MT140 Unit 5 questions, answered

What if the case does not say why people left?

Then infer carefully and say that you are inferring. Look at what the case does state, such as schedule, pay, training length or supervisor behavior, and connect each detail to a staffing concept. Present those links as the most likely explanations rather than as facts. Graders generally accept reasoned inference when it is labeled and grounded in what the case supplied.

Do I need to cover every staffing stage?

Most prompts expect the full sequence to be considered, but not weighted equally. A short paragraph can dismiss a stage that worked, which frees space for the ones that failed. Check the rubric, because some sections focus Unit 5 on selection or on training alone, and in that case the analysis should narrow to match the question actually asked.

Can the recommendations include a pay increase?

They can mention it, but they should not depend on it. Pay is usually set above the level of the manager the assignment asks you to advise, so a paper whose only fix is higher wages sidesteps the question. Name pay as a factor if the evidence supports it, then recommend changes the supervisor can make without anyone's approval.

Where can I find a free MT140 Unit 5 sample paper?

A full MT140 Unit 5 staffing case analysis appears on this page. It traces nine early departures of seasonal photographers through each staffing stage, ranks the failures, cites four real sources and includes margin notes on the strongest moves.

What does the sample recommend instead of a portfolio review?

A thirty-minute work sample, in which a candidate photographs twenty volunteers with the company's standard setup, paired with an interview that asks every applicant identical questions. Both test the pace and patience the job needs, which a portfolio of creative work cannot show.