Split between managing and leading, one laboratory director's draw-time decision becomes an HA515 Unit 1 test of Zaleznik against Mintzberg, with the merged tasks as evidence. Searches like "ha 515 unit 1 assignment example", "ha515 unit 1 sample" and "ha515 unit 1 example" land here.
What a finished HA515 Unit 1 leadership versus management analysis looks like
Roughly four and a half pages, APA formatted. The decision comes first, in operational terms: phlebotomy rounds starting at 4 a.m. on medical floors at two hospitals, sleep complaints in patient surveys, and hospitalists who want results by 7:30. Next, the two positions under test are laid out, Zaleznik's 1977 claim that managers and leaders differ in temperament and purpose, and Mintzberg's later argument that leadership cut off from managing becomes disconnected from the work. The body then sorts the decision's tasks into a two-column table: courier schedules, analyzer capacity, staffing a compressed window and budget on one side; persuading hospitalists, reframing sleep as a clinical outcome and enlisting night nurses on the other. A closing section examines tasks that belong in both columns.
How a HA515 Unit 1 example is structured
The analysis works from one decision rather than from definitions, which keeps the distinction testable. Each task is placed in a column with a sentence of reasoning, and a third category collects tasks that resist sorting: the staffing change, for instance, is a scheduling problem and also a question of whether phlebotomists will accept a later shift. That third category is where the paper makes its argument. Zaleznik's separation predicts the director needs two different modes, perhaps two different people; Mintzberg's integration predicts the tasks cannot be divided without loss. Evidence from this decision favors Mintzberg on staffing and Zaleznik on the hospitalist conversation, and the paper says so rather than adopting one theorist wholesale. A final paragraph identifies the director's first move and classifies it, since whether that move is managing or leading turns out to matter.
A draw time, described operationally
Start times, the two hospitals, survey comments about sleep and the hospitalists' deadline for results, set out before any theory so the decision can be examined on its own terms.
Two theorists, two predictions
Zaleznik's distinction by temperament and Mintzberg's objection to separating the two, each restated as a prediction about how this director's work ought to divide.
Tasks sorted into columns
Courier timing, analyzer throughput, a revised budget and staffing grid on one side; persuading physicians, reframing sleep and recruiting night nurses on the other.
Work that belongs to both
The later shift for phlebotomists is scheduling and persuasion at once. The paper treats that overlap as evidence about the theories, not as a sorting failure.
The first move, classified
A two-week pilot on one medical floor is proposed and labeled: a managed test whose purpose is to make a leadership argument to physicians possible.
Where marks go in HA515 Unit 1
Lists of contrasts between leaders and managers, applied to nothing, are where Unit 1 analyses most often fall short. A paper does better when it tests the distinction on a real or composite healthcare decision and reports what the test showed. Fair representation of the theorists also counts: Zaleznik did not claim management was inferior, and Mintzberg did not deny that leadership exists. Setting up one side as a straw figure is frequently marked down under analysis. Healthcare specificity matters, since the course asks where each function shows up in health settings, and a paper that could describe any industry misses that. The conclusion is usually expected to take a position on the distinction's usefulness rather than resting on balance.
Get a HA515 Unit 1 example written to your instructions
Frame a pending decision in your department, or take the scenario your prompt supplies, and send it with the Unit 1 instructions and rubric. You receive a first analysis free within 24-48h, sorting that decision's tasks into managing and leading and arguing where the distinction holds and where it breaks down under a real decision.
HA515 Unit 1 questions, answered
Which theorists usually appear in this unit?
Zaleznik and Kotter are frequent, each arguing that leading and managing differ, and Mintzberg is a common counterweight. Bennis also appears in some course readings. Whatever the section assigns comes first. Two theorists who disagree usually make a stronger paper than several who agree, because the decision can then be used to test them against each other.
Can the decision come from a non-clinical department?
Yes. Laboratory, supply chain, patient access and facilities decisions all work, and they often show the distinction more clearly than bedside examples because the department head's authority is easier to define. The paper should still explain how the decision reaches patients, which keeps it within the course's healthcare focus and shows why the department head's choice matters beyond the department.
Should the paper conclude that leadership matters more?
Not by default. Many strong papers conclude that the distinction is useful for diagnosing what a decision needs but misleading as a description of roles. What matters is that the conclusion follows from the decision examined. A verdict that leadership matters more, asserted without evidence from the case, tends to read as a slogan.