GF599 · Unit 1

GF599 Unit 1 project proposal example

Graduate Capstone in Finance Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

An unsolicited letter from a net-lease investor gives this GF599 Unit 1 project proposal its question: should a composite eleven-store tire and auto service chain sell the seven buildings it owns for 11.2 million dollars and lease them back for fifteen years, or keep them and borrow against them? The proposal fixes that one financing decision as the term's subject and fences off the rest.

What this page holds

Sell seven buildings and rent them back, or keep them and borrow: this GF599 Unit 1 project proposal narrows a tire chain's financing choice to one answerable question. Searches like "gf 599 unit 1 assignment example", "gf599 unit 1 sample" and "gf599 unit 1 example" land here.

What a finished GF599 Unit 1 project proposal looks like

Four pages or so, under a title that names the organization and the decision. Page one states the question in a single sentence, with the investor's terms beside it: 11.2 million for the seven sites, a fifteen-year absolute net lease starting at 756,000 dollars a year, rent rising 2 percent annually, and four five-year renewal options. A short profile of composite Tollbrook Tire and Service follows, eleven stores, about 38.5 million of revenue and 4.62 million of EBITDA, with a revolving line drawn to 6.4 million at a floating rate near 7.1 percent. The criterion comes next: whichever route costs the chain less after tax over the full lease term, counting what the buildings would be worth at its end. A scope box lists exclusions, and a closing paragraph names three documents the analysis cannot start without.

How a GF599 Unit 1 example is structured

Question first, proof of feasibility last: the proposal runs in the order an approving reader needs. The decision sentence leads, followed by why it deserves a term, namely that the offer lapses in April and the owner-president has asked the controller's office for a recommendation before then. The organization profile is held to what the question uses, which means the owned and leased stores, the debt and the covenant that governs it, and nothing about tire brands or advertising. A criterion paragraph commits to after-tax cost over fifteen years as the single test and rules out the size of the check as a reason to sell. The scope section excludes valuing the chain as a whole, the four leased stores and any expansion plan. Data requirements close the proposal: what is needed, who holds each item, and which have already been promised.

One decision, one sentence

Sell and lease back on the investor's terms, or keep the buildings and refinance the revolving line against them, is written once and never widened later in the paper.

Why this term and not next

The letter of intent lapses in April, which gives the question a real deadline and gives the owner-president a reason to read whatever the project concludes.

A test chosen in advance

After-tax cost across the fifteen-year lease, with the buildings' end value included, is named as the only criterion, so a large check cannot win by its size alone.

Fences around the question

Company valuation, the four leased stores and a proposed twelfth location all sit outside the project, each with a sentence explaining how it would dilute the answer.

Documents already promised

The investor's letter, the fixed-asset register and a bank's mortgage indication are listed beside the person who agreed to release each one, and by when.

Where marks go in GF599 Unit 1

Graders reading a capstone proposal look first for a decision with alternatives, and proposals naming a topic instead, such as real estate strategy for a retailer, typically score lowest because nothing later can be concluded from them. A criterion left unstated draws the next heaviest comment: without one, the final report can adopt whichever measure favors its answer. Scope that sprawls into valuing the whole company signals a project likely to run out of units before it runs out of questions. Data needs listed without holders read as hopeful, and graders frequently ask who has agreed to what. Background on the tire trade that the question never uses fills pages and earns little. Proposals stating the deadline and the reader, here the owner-president and the April expiry, show work an organization actually commissioned.

Get a GF599 Unit 1 example written to your instructions

Tell us the organization and the decision it faces, then attach the proposal prompt and rubric from your GF599 section. What comes back states that decision in one sentence, commits to a single criterion, fences the scope and names who holds each figure. Your first custom sample carries no charge and typically arrives in 24-48h.

GF599 Unit 1 questions, answered

Is Tollbrook Tire and Service a real company?

No. Tollbrook is invented, and its store counts, debt, lease terms and tax basis were set so that every figure reconciles with every other, as an operator's books would. Your own proposal will name your employer or an organization whose figures you can obtain. What the page demonstrates is the shape of a scoped financing question, never facts about a business.

Why not simply value the whole company?

Because a valuation of the chain answers a question nobody asked. The decision on the table concerns seven buildings and one lease offer, and it can be settled with the documents listed. A company valuation would need forecasts for every store and would still leave the sale-leaseback question open when the term ended.

What if my organization has no offer like this one?

Many projects start from a decision management is already weighing, such as a refinancing, a large equipment purchase or a change in customer payment terms. If none exists, a question can be built from filings or internal plans, provided the alternatives are real and priced. Instructors tend to approve a narrower version faster than an ambitious one.