GB534 Unit 9 Post-Purchase Analysis Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Consumer Behavior Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This GB534 Unit 9 post-purchase analysis reports a survey of 1,140 composite buyers ninety days after receiving a Denver brand's $379 compact stroller. Purdue Global GB 534, Consumer Behavior, asks MBA students to analyze satisfaction and complaining after purchase. Of the 182 who reported a sticking fold latch or squealing wheel, 62 complained, 38 only posted reviews and 82 did nothing. Two-thirds of the silent buyers gave reasons the brand could fix: effort, not knowing how to complain and low expectations. Buyers whose problems were fixed recommend the brand about as strongly as those with no problem, while dismissed complainers score lowest.

CourseGB534 Consumer Behavior
UnitUnit 9
Paper typePost-purchase analysis
LengthAbout 1,100 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMBA
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for GB534 Unit 9

1

182 Problems and 82 Silences: A Unit 9 Post-Purchase Analysis of a Compact Stroller's Unheard Complaints

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

GB534: Consumer Behavior

Unit 9 Post-Purchase Analysis

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The stroller brand, the survey and every figure are composite and illustrative; the frameworks and sources cited are real.

What this part is doingStating the three numbers in the lead tells the reader the analysis is about the gap between problems and complaints.
2

The Survey

Front Range Strollers surveyed buyers of its compact model ninety days after delivery. Of 3,800 buyers invited, 1,140 responded, a rate of about 30 percent. Respondents were asked whether they had experienced a problem, what they did about it and how likely they were to recommend the brand.

Table 1: What Buyers With a Problem Did

Of the 1,140 respondents, 182, about 16 percent, reported a problem with the fold latch or a wheel.

Complained to the brand: 62, about 34 percent of those with a problem.

Posted a public review only, without contacting the brand: 38, about 21 percent.

Did nothing: 82, about 45 percent.

Singh (1988) classified responses to dissatisfaction into voice responses directed at the seller, private responses such as switching brands or warning friends, and third-party responses directed at outside parties. Here, the 62 who complained used voice; the 38 who posted reviews used a public, third-party response; and the 82 who did nothing chose no visible response, though some may have warned friends privately.

Table 2: What Happened to the Complainers

Of the 62 who complained, 49, about 79 percent, had the problem fixed, usually by a free replacement latch or wheel sent by mail. The other 13 were still waiting or had been told the problem was within normal limits.

Table 3: Likelihood to Recommend

On a scale from 0 to 10:

Buyers with no problem: about 8.4.

Complainers whose problem was fixed: about 8.6.

Complainers whose problem was not fixed: about 4.1.

Public review only: about 5.0.

Did nothing: about 6.2.

Buyers whose problems were fixed are slightly more likely to recommend the brand than buyers who never had a problem, while silent buyers sit well below both.

What this part is doingThe highlighted sentence shows that the brand's best outcome follows a complaint, which is why the silence matters.
3

Why 82 Said Nothing

Silent buyers were asked why they had not contacted the brand.

It was not worth the effort for a small problem: 31.

Did not know how or whom to contact: 22.

Fixed it themselves, for example with lubricant: 17.

Expected nothing would happen: 12.

Two-thirds of the silent buyers gave reasons that the brand could address: effort, not knowing how and low expectations. Hirschman (1970) argued that customers who are dissatisfied choose between exit and voice, and that voice is more likely when it is easy and expected to work. For a $379 stroller with a squeaky wheel, voice looked costly and uncertain, so many buyers simply lived with the problem or quietly lowered their opinion of the brand.

Expectations and Satisfaction

In the model Oliver (1980) proposed, a buyer's satisfaction depends on whether the product does better or worse than expected. A sticking latch on a stroller sold for its one-hand fold disconfirms the main expectation buyers had. Without a fix, the disconfirmation persists, which may explain why silent buyers' recommendation scores are low even when the problem is minor.

A Recovery Paradox, or Not?

Some research describes a service recovery paradox, in which customers whose problems are fixed well end up more loyal than customers who never had a problem. The survey's figures, 8.6 against 8.4, point in that direction, but the difference is small and based on 49 buyers. The safer reading is that a quick fix restores customers to where they would have been, which is valuable in itself, and that the brand should not count on problems to build loyalty.

The Thirteen Unresolved Complaints

The worst outcomes came from the 13 complainers whose problems were not fixed, several of whom had been told a squeaking wheel was within normal limits. Their recommendation score, about 4.1, is the lowest of any group, lower even than buyers who said nothing. A complaint that is heard and dismissed appears to do more damage than a problem never raised. The policy of judging some squeaks normal should be dropped for a part that costs a few dollars to replace.

The Public Reviewers

The 38 buyers who posted reviews without contacting the brand matter beyond their own numbers, because their reviews are read by prospective buyers. Several said in the survey that they assumed a review was the quickest way to be noticed. Responding publicly to those reviews with an offer of a part would both help the reviewer and show other shoppers how the brand treats problems.

What the Silence Costs

If the survey's pattern holds across all 3,800 buyers, about 600 had a problem and about 270 said nothing. Their average recommendation score is about two points below that of buyers whose problems were fixed. In a category where parents rely heavily on recommendations from friends and relatives, as the reference group analysis in Unit 8 showed, that gap reaches many future buyers.

Recommendations

Make complaining easy. Place a small printed code on the stroller frame, near the latch, that opens a one-step request for a replacement part.

Contact buyers first. Send a short message at thirty and sixty days asking whether the fold and wheels work smoothly, with a link to request a part.

Ship parts without questions. For latches and wheels, which cost little, send replacements without requiring proof.

Answer public reviews. Respond to reviews mentioning these problems with an offer to send a part, which may reach the 38 who used public channels.

Hoyer et al. (2018) note that firms that encourage complaints can learn about problems early and keep customers who would otherwise leave quietly. The latch and wheel complaints also point to a design or supplier issue that engineering should investigate, since a problem reported by one buyer in six within ninety days is too common to treat as normal wear.

What this part is doingLinking the recommendations to the product problem behind the complaints shows the analysis serves engineering as well as service.
4

Cost of the Program

A replacement latch or wheel costs the brand about $12 including mailing. Sending parts to every buyer who reports a problem, perhaps 600 a year at current volumes, would cost about $7,200, plus the cost of the thirty- and sixty-day messages. Against the referral value of restoring several hundred buyers' recommendations, the program is inexpensive.

Limits

Survey respondents may differ from nonrespondents, and buyers who had problems may have responded at a different rate from those who did not. The recommendation scores are stated intentions, not observed referrals, and a follow-up that tracked actual referrals through a friend discount code would show whether the intention gap becomes a sales gap.

5

References

Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.

Hoyer, W. D., MacInnis, D. J., & Pieters, R. (2018). Consumer behavior (7th ed.). Cengage.

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405

Singh, J. (1988). Consumer complaint intentions and behavior: Definitional and taxonomical issues. Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200108

Reading the GB 534 Unit 9 instructions

In GB534 Unit 9 you analyze what buyers do after a purchase goes wrong. Describe the survey or other data. Classify buyers' responses to problems using a complaint framework, and report what happened to those who complained. Compare satisfaction or recommendation across groups, interpreting any apparent recovery effect cautiously. Report why silent buyers stayed silent, and connect their reasons to theory about exit and voice. Estimate what silence costs, examine the worst outcomes and the role of public reviews, and recommend changes with their cost. Close with limits. Expect about six pages with three tables and a short model, citing complaint and satisfaction research in APA 7, and keep percentages tied to their bases.

How this GB534 Unit 9 example is built

The analysis describes 1,140 responses from 3,800 invitations. Table 1 classifies 182 problems into voice, public and no response using Singh's taxonomy. Table 2 shows 49 of 62 complaints fixed. Table 3 compares recommendation scores, and the highlighted sentence notes that fixed complainers match problem-free buyers. A section treats the recovery paradox cautiously, another examines thirteen dismissed complaints, and another the public reviewers. Silent buyers' reasons are linked to Hirschman's exit and voice. Oliver's expectation model explains why a sticking latch hurts a stroller sold on its fold. The cost of silence, four recommendations citing Hoyer, MacInnis and Pieters, a $7,200 parts program and limits close it.

GB534 Unit 9 rubric: what earns full points

The GB534 post-purchase analysis is assessed on whether silence is measured as carefully as complaints. Classifying responses with a framework earns early credit. Reporting outcomes for complainers shows follow-through. Comparing recommendation across groups, and treating any recovery effect with caution, carries significant weight. Explaining silent buyers' reasons with exit and voice theory shows depth. Estimating the cost of silence and examining the worst outcomes show analytical care. Recommendations that make complaining easy, with their cost, show practicality. Limits complete it. Its APA 7 sources are Singh's complaint taxonomy, Hirschman on exit and voice, Oliver's expectation model and the Hoyer text, each applied to a specific table.

GB534 Unit 9 help: mistakes that cost points

Many GB534 Unit 9 analyses count complaints and treat the rest of the customers as satisfied. Others claim a recovery paradox from a small difference. A common gap is silence: customers who say nothing may quietly lower their opinion and tell friends, and their reasons usually point to fixes. Some writers ignore public reviews, which prospective buyers read. Classify responses, report outcomes, compare recommendation across groups, explain silence with theory, estimate its cost, examine dismissed complaints and public reviews, and recommend inexpensive fixes. Placing a request code on the product itself removes the most common barrier, not knowing how to complain, and contacting buyers at thirty days reaches those who would never write first.

Get a GB534 Unit 9 example written to your instructions

The Unit 9 analysis starts from a disappointed customer: yours, one you have read about, or a case your section supplies. Add the prompt and the rubric. The sample, returned in 24-48h and free the first time, explains who complained, who left and why, with theory attached only where it explains something. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More GB534 papers and MBA samples

GB534 Unit 9 questions, answered

What is the difference between cognitive dissonance and dissatisfaction?

Dissonance is the doubt a buyer feels after committing to a choice, often before anything has gone wrong, especially after an expensive or hard-to-reverse purchase. Dissatisfaction follows a disappointing experience with the product itself. They interact: a buyer already feeling dissonance may read a small fault as proof of a bad decision. A good paper keeps the two distinct.

Why would a customer who had a problem recommend the product more?

When a complaint is handled quickly and generously, some customers come away more confident in the firm than if nothing had gone wrong. This is called the service recovery paradox. Evidence for it is mixed, and it tends to hold only for minor problems resolved well, so present it as a possibility your data may support rather than a rule.

Can I use online reviews as data for this unit?

Often, yes, and they suit it well because they show public complaining directly. Remember what they cannot show: the customers who stayed silent. If your prompt allows, pair reviews with another source, such as your own experience or a short survey, so the analysis can say something about the quiet majority as well.

Where can I find a free GB534 Unit 9 sample paper?

This page carries a full GB534 Unit 9 post-purchase analysis of stroller complaints, with responses classified, outcomes, recommendation scores, reasons for silence, recommendations and APA 7 references.

Do fixed complaints create more loyal customers?

The survey's fixed complainers score slightly higher than problem-free buyers, 8.6 against 8.4, but the difference is small and rests on 49 buyers. The safer conclusion is that a quick fix restores them to where they would have been.