| Course | GB532 Marketing Research |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 6 |
| Paper type | Questionnaire draft |
| Length | About 920 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MBA |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for GB532 Unit 6
Twenty-Two Items, Each With a Defense: A Unit 6 Questionnaire Draft for Propane Customers With Heat Pumps
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
GB532: Marketing Research
Unit 6 Questionnaire Draft
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The propane distributor and the questionnaire are composite; the questionnaire design principles and sources cited are real.
The Cover Letter
The letter explains that Otter Creek Propane is asking customers how they heat their homes so it can plan deliveries and services, promises that answers will not affect anyone's delivery or price, gives an estimated eight minutes, and names a person to contact. Dillman et al. (2014) find that explaining who is asking, why and how answers will be used raises response and trust, especially when a company surveys its own customers.
Section 1: Who Decides
Item 1. "Who in your household usually makes decisions about heating equipment and fuel?" Options: I do; I share these decisions; someone else does.
Note: placed first so that the rest of the survey can be read in light of who answered. A respondent who does not decide can still describe the home's equipment, so no one is screened out.
Section 2: Equipment
Items 2 to 6 ask whether the home has a propane furnace or boiler, propane space heaters, a heat pump, a wood or pellet stove, or electric baseboard heat, each answered yes or no.
Note: a list of yes-or-no items is used rather than a single "check all that apply," because people answering a check-all list tend to stop early. Groves et al. (2009) describe this tendency and recommend forced-choice formats for items that matter.
Item 7. For homes with a heat pump: "What kind?" Options: ducted, using the home's air ducts; ductless, with wall or ceiling units; not sure. A small drawing of each type accompanies the options.
Item 8. "About how many indoor heat pump units does your home have?"
Item 9. "In what year was your first heat pump installed?" with the option "not sure."
Note: "not sure" is offered because many households did not install the equipment themselves.
Section 3: How the Home Is Heated
Item 10. "During a typical winter month, about what share of your home's heat comes from each source?" with a row for each source the respondent marked and answers in tenths, from none to all.
A question asking for the "primary heat source" forces a hybrid household to pick one answer when in truth the answer changes with the temperature outside.
Note: this item replaced an earlier version asking for the primary heat source.
Item 11. "On the coldest days of winter, which heat source does most of the work?" Options include each source and "both about equally."
Item 12. "Has your propane use changed in the last two winters?" Options: increased, about the same, decreased, not sure.
Item 13. For those who answered decreased: "What is the main reason?" with options including a heat pump, insulation or windows, fewer people at home, lower thermostat settings, price and other.
Section 4: Delivery and Service
Items 14 to 16 ask for satisfaction with delivery timing, communication about deliveries and price, each rated on five labeled points with dissatisfied at one end and satisfied at the other.
Note: each aspect is asked separately to avoid double-barreled items that combine two questions.
Section 5: A Backup-Heat Plan
Item 17 describes the plan in three sentences: guaranteed delivery during cold snaps, a smaller annual fee for tank and monitoring, and pricing based on how much propane is actually used. It asks: "How interested would you be in a plan like this?" with five labeled answers running from no interest to strong interest.
Item 18 asks which feature matters most.
Note: the plan is described only after the use questions, so that answers about use are not shaped by knowledge of the offer.
Section 6: Heat Pump Services
Item 19. "Would you consider having Otter Creek install or service a heat pump for you?" Options: yes, maybe, no.
Section 7: About the Home
Items 20 to 22 ask the home's approximate size, number of people living there and years as an Otter Creek customer.
Note: placed last, since personal questions are easier to answer once the survey's purpose is clear, and needed to compare respondents with the frame.
Malhotra (2019) recommends ordering questionnaires from general to specific and from easy to sensitive, which the draft follows.
Items Considered and Dropped
Three items were drafted and removed. A question asking customers to rate their likelihood of switching suppliers was dropped because it invites strategic answers from customers hoping for a discount. A question about household income was dropped because it adds length and sensitivity without serving any objective in the problem definition memo. And a question asking why the household installed a heat pump was dropped because the decision does not depend on the reason, only on how the home now uses propane. Each removal shortens the survey, which matters for response rates in a mailed questionnaire.
Length and Layout
The instrument runs four pages, printed in a booklet with one column of questions per page and generous space between items. Skip instructions for the heat pump items appear as arrows next to the answer boxes rather than as written instructions, which respondents often miss. The estimated completion time of eight minutes was checked by two colleagues timing themselves.
Next Step
The draft will be read aloud by a few propane customers before printing, to find items they stumble on.
References
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.
Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Malhotra, N. K. (2019). Marketing research: An applied orientation (7th ed.). Pearson.
GB532 Unit 6 instructions, in plain terms
GB532 Unit 6 asks you to draft a questionnaire for your study. Begin with a short cover letter that explains who is asking, why and how answers will be used. Organize items into sections in a logical order, and for each item or group, add a note defending its wording, answer format and position. Watch for terms that mean different things to different respondents, double-barreled items and formats that encourage careless answers. Place any description of a new concept where it will not shape earlier answers. Explain items you considered and dropped, describe the layout and length, and say how the draft will be pretested. Expect the instrument plus item notes, citing questionnaire design sources in APA 7.
Inside the GB532 Unit 6 example
The draft opens with a cover letter, citing Dillman, Smyth and Christian on trust. Section 1 asks who decides, without screening anyone out. Section 2 uses yes-or-no equipment items, citing Groves and colleagues on check-all lists, plus heat pump type, units and age. Section 3 asks the share of heat by source, and the highlighted sentence explains why a primary-source question fails hybrid homes; it adds coldest-day and change items. Section 4 asks about delivery aspects separately. Section 5 describes the plan after the use questions. Sections 6 and 7 cover services and the home, ordered after Malhotra's general-to-specific advice. Three dropped items, layout and the pretest plan close it.
GB532 Unit 6 rubric: what earns full points
Instructors grading a GB532 questionnaire look for a defense of every item and for wording that respondents in unusual situations can still answer. A cover letter that addresses respondents' concerns earns early credit. Logical section order, from easy to sensitive, shows understanding. Notes that justify wording, scale and position carry significant weight. Replacing ambiguous terms with questions respondents can actually answer shows care. Placing the concept description after behavior items shows awareness of order effects. Explaining dropped items and layout shows judgment about length. A pretest plan completes it. The draft's APA 7 references are Dillman and colleagues, Groves and colleagues and Malhotra.
GB532 Unit 6 help from the desk
Many GB532 Unit 6 drafts list questions without explaining any of them, so the reader cannot tell which choices were deliberate. Others use terms, such as primary heat source, that respondents in mixed situations cannot answer honestly. A frequent gap is order: describing a new offer early can change how respondents answer later behavior questions. Some writers include items that serve no objective. Write a cover letter, order sections from easy to sensitive, defend every item, replace ambiguous terms, place concepts after behavior, drop what the decision does not need and plan a pretest. Checking completion time with a few colleagues keeps the promise in the cover letter honest.
Get a GB532 Unit 6 example written to your instructions
Share the Unit 6 prompt, the GB532 rubric and the objectives your survey must serve. Whether your section wants items alone or items with a defense, the custom draft arrives with wording, scale and position justified item by item, in 24-48h and at no charge for a first sample. Say if a cover letter is expected. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More GB532 papers and MBA samples
- GB532 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- GB532 Unit 2: Problem Definition Memo
- GB532 Unit 3: Secondary Data Review
- GB532 Unit 4: Research Proposal
- GB532 Unit 5: Sampling Plan
- GB532 Unit 7: Seminar Reflection
- GB532 Unit 8: Data Analysis Report
- GB532 Unit 9: Findings Interpretation
- GB532 Unit 10: Research Report
- GB531 Unit 6: Media Plan
- GB530 Unit 6: Product Strategy
- GB528 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- GB527 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
GB532 Unit 6 questions, answered
How many questions should the draft include?
As many as the objectives need and no more, commonly fifteen to twenty-five for a course survey. Length lowers completion, particularly on paper. If an item cannot be linked to an objective or a planned analysis, most graders would rather see it cut. Some sections set a range, and the prompt's figure should come first.
Should I include open-ended questions?
One or two can be valuable, especially where the answer options might miss something, but each creates coding work later. If your draft includes them, say how responses will be categorized, since GB532 analysis units often penalize open answers summarized without a coding scheme. Closed items with an other option handle most needs.
Do I need to pretest the questionnaire?
Many sections ask for a pretest plan now and results later, sometimes in a seminar unit. Even where it is not required, a sentence naming how the draft will be tested, with whom, and what would count as a problem strengthens the design. Pretests catch confusing wording that the writer cannot see.
Where can I find a free GB532 Unit 6 sample paper?
This page carries a full GB532 Unit 6 questionnaire draft for propane customers, with a cover letter, twenty-two items in seven sections, a note defending each, dropped items and APA 7 references.
Why replace yes-or-no items for a check-all-that-apply list?
People answering a check-all list tend to stop once they have marked a few options, so items lower in the list are under-reported. Asking yes or no for each source makes respondents consider every one.