GB500 Unit 6 SWOT and TOWS Analysis Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Business Perspectives Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This GB500 Unit 6 situational SWOT analysis helps a composite chain of eleven family-owned grocery stores decide how to compete as a national discounter opens nearby. Purdue Global GB 500, Business Perspectives, asks MBA students to combine several functional views in one case analysis. The discounter will open within two miles of Halvern's Markets' two highest-volume stores, which produce 31 percent of sales. Each SWOT entry is a fact with a figure or date, from butcher counters producing 14 percent of sales to prices 9 percent above the discounter's. Weihrich's TOWS pairs turn the grid into options, Porter's generic strategies rule out price matching, and the chain commits to fresh, prepared and local food over eighteen months.

CourseGB500 Business Perspectives
UnitUnit 6
Paper typeSituational SWOT analysis
LengthAbout 850 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMBA
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for GB500 Unit 6

1

Eleven Family Stores and a Discounter Coming to Town: A Unit 6 SWOT Analysis That Commits to a Strategy

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

GB500: Business Perspectives

Unit 6 Situational SWOT Analysis

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The grocery chain, the entrant and every figure are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingPromising a commitment in the lead signals that the grid is a tool, not the conclusion.
2

The Decision

Halvern's Markets, a composite chain of eleven family-owned grocery stores in a small-city region, must decide how to compete over the next eighteen months. A national discount grocer will open a store in March within two miles of Halvern's two highest-volume locations, which together produce 31 percent of the chain's sales.

The SWOT Grid

Terry Hill and Roy Westbrook found that SWOT analyses are often vague lists that never lead to action, and recommend that each entry be specific and verified (Hill & Westbrook, 1997). Each entry below is worded as a fact from the case.

Strengths. Full-service butcher counters in all eleven stores, which produce 14 percent of sales and draw customers twice a week on average. A loyalty program with 48,000 active members, about 70 percent of households in the trade area. Long-tenured staff, with average tenure of nine years, and customer satisfaction scores above the regional average.

Weaknesses. A point-of-sale system installed in 2011 that cannot support digital coupons or online ordering. Prices on packaged goods that average 9 percent above the discounter's in a basket comparison. No private-label line beyond a few bakery items.

Opportunities. A residential development of 1,200 homes under construction near three stores, with first occupancy in the spring. A regional produce cooperative willing to supply local fruit and vegetables under contract. Rising demand for prepared meals among working households, which the chain's own deli sales have shown for two years.

Threats. The discounter's arrival, with a smaller store, a narrow assortment and low prices on staples. Wage increases of about 6 percent a year in the local labor market. Online grocery delivery from a national chain that began service in the region last year.

Every entry in the grid is a fact with a number or a date, so the options that follow can be tested rather than argued.

What this part is doingThe highlighted sentence explains why the grid's wording matters for the analysis that follows.
3

Paired Options

Heinz Weihrich's TOWS matrix moves from description to choice by crossing each internal factor with each external one and asking what strategy the pair suggests (Weihrich, 1982).

Strengths with opportunities. Use the butcher counters and long-tenured staff to build a prepared-meals line, and stock local produce under the cooperative contract, marketed to the new households.

Strengths with threats. Defend the two exposed stores by making the butcher counter and service the reason to shop there, with loyalty pricing on meat and produce, the categories where the discounter is weakest.

Weaknesses with opportunities. Replace the point-of-sale system to support digital coupons and online ordering, so the new development's households can order from the start.

Weaknesses with threats. Try to match the discounter's prices on packaged goods across all stores.

Why Not Compete on Price

Michael Porter's generic strategies put low cost and differentiation at opposite ends, warning that a firm stuck between them usually earns the least (Porter, 1980). The discounter has chosen cost: a limited assortment, fewer staff and lower prices on staples. Halvern's cannot match that cost structure with full-service counters, long-tenured staff and eleven older stores. Its realistic path is differentiation, built on fresh food, service and local sourcing, which customers can see and the discounter does not offer.

What this part is doingTesting the rejected option against a strategy framework shows the choice was argued, not assumed.
4

The Chosen Strategy

Halvern's should not try to match the discounter on packaged goods. A 9 percent price gap on a narrow assortment is the discounter's whole business model, and closing it would cost Halvern's most of its margin. Instead, the chain should compete where it is strong and the discounter is weak: fresh meat, produce and prepared meals, delivered with service.

For the next eighteen months, Halvern's should combine the first two paired options. In the first six months, it should launch a prepared-meals counter in the two exposed stores and the three nearest the new development, sign the produce cooperative contract and offer loyalty pricing on meat and produce. In months six to twelve, it should replace the point-of-sale system, starting with the two exposed stores. In months twelve to eighteen, it should add online ordering for pickup. The store managers of the two exposed locations should report weekly sales by category from the discounter's opening, so the chain can see early whether fresh and prepared sales are rising as planned.

The Risk It Accepts

The strategy accepts that some customers will move their packaged-goods shopping to the discounter. Halvern's expects to lose about 8 percent of packaged-goods sales in the two exposed stores, roughly 3 percent of their total sales, during the first year. The bet is that fresh and prepared categories, which carry higher margins and bring customers in more often, will make up the difference. If total sales at the two exposed stores fall more than 12 percent in the half year after the discounter opens, the chain should revisit the plan.

5

References

Hill, T., & Westbrook, R. (1997). SWOT analysis: It's time for a product recall. Long Range Planning, 30(1), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(96)00095-7

Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.

Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix: A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Planning, 15(2), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(82)90120-0

The Purdue Global GB500 Unit 6 instructions

In GB500 Unit 6 you build a SWOT analysis from a case and use it to choose a strategy. State the decision in one sentence. Build the grid with three to five entries per quadrant, each worded as a fact from the case with a figure or date, and keep internal strengths and weaknesses separate from external opportunities and threats. Then cross the quadrants into paired options, using a TOWS approach. Test the most tempting option against a strategy framework before rejecting or choosing it. Commit to one strategy with an implementation outline over a stated period. Name the risk the strategy accepts and the signal that would trigger a review. Expect four to six pages with the grid as a figure, citing strategy sources in APA 7.

How the GB 500 Unit 6 example is put together

The decision is how Halvern's should compete over eighteen months. Following Hill and Westbrook's warning about vague SWOTs, strengths include butcher counters, a 48,000-member loyalty program and nine-year average staff tenure; weaknesses include a 2011 point-of-sale system, a 9 percent price gap and little private label; opportunities include a 1,200-home development, a produce cooperative and prepared-meal demand; threats include the discounter, 6 percent wage growth and online delivery. The highlighted sentence explains why entries carry numbers. Weihrich's TOWS produces four paired options. Porter's generic strategies rule out price matching. The chosen strategy launches prepared meals and local produce in five stores, replaces the point-of-sale system and adds online pickup. The accepted risk is about 8 percent of packaged-goods sales, with a review if total sales fall 12 percent.

Where the points sit in the GB500 Unit 6 rubric

GB500 rubric points for this analysis go to evidence in every entry, correct sorting and a committed decision. Instructors check that each SWOT item is a specific fact from the case and that internal and external factors are not mixed. Crossing quadrants into options, as TOWS formalizes, separates a strategy from a list. Testing the tempting option against a framework shows reasoning. A chosen strategy with a timeline and owners earns more than a list of possibilities. Naming the accepted risk and a review trigger shows realism. Hill and Westbrook in Long Range Planning, Weihrich in Long Range Planning and Porter's Competitive Strategy supply the references in APA 7.

GB500 Unit 6 help from the desk

Many GB500 Unit 6 papers fill the grid with general statements, such as good customer service, that could describe any business. Others place external trends among weaknesses or internal problems among threats. A frequent gap is the decision: a SWOT that ends with the grid, or with a list of everything the company could do, leaves the case unanswered. Some writers choose a strategy without saying what it gives up. State the decision, fill each quadrant with facts and figures, sort carefully, pair the quadrants, test the tempting option, commit to one strategy with a timeline and name the risk you accept.

Get a GB500 Unit 6 example written to your instructions

With the Unit 6 case, its prompt, and the rubric in hand, a SWOT analysis carried through to a chosen strategy is drafted for your GB500 section in 24 to 48 hours. Send those three items to start. The first sample is free, and a TOWS pairing or another matrix appears wherever the prompt names one. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More GB500 papers and MBA samples

GB500 Unit 6 questions, answered

How many items should each SWOT quadrant have?

Three to five entries per quadrant is typical in finished GB500 examples, and fewer strong entries beat many thin ones. What graders check is whether each item comes from the case with evidence and whether it matters to the decision. A quadrant with two well-supported entries can outscore one padded with generic observations that no later section uses.

Is a TOWS matrix required, or is SWOT enough?

It depends on your section's prompt. Some ask only for a SWOT with a recommendation; others name TOWS explicitly. Even where it is not required, the crossing move TOWS formalizes, pairing strengths with opportunities and so on, is usually what separates a strategy from a list. It can appear as a short paragraph instead of a second matrix.

Can the Unit 6 SWOT be about my own employer?

Some GB500 sections allow a workplace SWOT; many assign a case so everyone analyzes the same facts. If yours permits it, the same standards apply: evidence for each entry, correct sorting, and a decision at the end. Sensitive internal data is better generalized, since the analysis may be shared on a discussion board or in a seminar.

Where can I find a free GB500 Unit 6 sample paper?

This page carries a full GB500 Unit 6 SWOT and TOWS analysis of an eleven-store grocery chain facing a national discounter, with a committed strategy and APA 7 references.

Why not match the discounter's prices?

Low prices on a narrow assortment are the discounter's business model, built on fewer staff and smaller stores. Closing a 9 percent gap with full-service counters and older stores would erase most of Halvern's margin, so the chain differentiates instead.