Built as a plan with a dependency chain, the AC298 proposal for Unit 2 fixes the business, the period, the deliverables and the tie-out method before any entry is made. Searches like "ac 298 unit 2 assignment example", "ac298 unit 2 sample" and "ac298 unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished AC298 Unit 2 capstone proposal looks like
Three to four pages, headed with a title block and a one-paragraph business profile: a single-owner paint and hardware retailer that sells to homeowners for cash and card and to a handful of painting contractors on 30-day terms, using a perpetual inventory system. A deliverables table follows with five rows, the December journal and ledger, the adjusted statements, a ratio analysis, a recommendation memo and a closing presentation, each paired with the unit where it typically lands and the inputs it needs. Below the table sits a short dependency diagram drawn as arrows. A section on assumptions records choices the problem leaves open, such as the depreciation method for the delivery van. The proposal closes with a tie-out plan: every figure quoted outside the statements will be listed on a reference sheet with its source.
How a AC298 Unit 2 example is structured
The business profile comes first because every later choice depends on what kind of company it is: a retailer needs inventory costing and cost of goods sold, while a service firm would not. Scope follows, stated as inclusions and exclusions, so the grader can see that payroll taxes and the bank loan are in and a sales tax return is out, if the problem allows that. The deliverables table is the center of the document and sets the sequence for the sections after it. The dependency section then explains the chain in prose: journal to ledger to trial balance, adjustments to statements, statements to ratios, ratios to memo. Assumptions and open questions for the instructor get their own heading. A schedule in units, never dates, closes the proposal alongside the reference-sheet method that will keep the numbers consistent.
A profile that decides the method
Naming a perpetual system and 30-day contractor terms in the first paragraph tells the reader which entries and which ratios the capstone will need.
Five deliverables in a table
Journal and ledger, statements, ratios, memo and presentation, each with its inputs listed. The table doubles as a checklist when the final submission is assembled.
The chain drawn out
Arrows from each deliverable to the next make the grading logic visible: a figure that changes upstream must change everywhere downstream.
Assumptions on the record
Depreciation method, the inventory count date and the treatment of a disputed contractor invoice are written down, so later units apply them consistently.
A reference sheet promised
The proposal commits to listing every figure quoted in prose with the statement line it came from, the control that the whole capstone will be judged by.
Where marks go in AC298 Unit 2
Proposals that describe the course rather than the project lose the most, restating course outcomes instead of naming the company, the period and the outputs. A deliverables list without inputs is the next weakness, because it hides the dependency that makes a capstone different from a set of separate assignments. Assumptions left unstated tend to cost points twice, once here for incompleteness and again later when a depreciation method changes between units. Some sections deduct when scope is so broad that no one could finish it, such as promising a full tax return alongside the statements. Calendar dates in place of unit numbers draw comment in some rubrics. Missing questions for the instructor, where the prompt invites them, and a proposal longer than the section's page limit make up the remainder.
Get a AC298 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Share the company profile your section assigned, the list of deliverables it expects and the Unit 2 rubric. The free first proposal, returned in 24-48h, builds the deliverables table and dependency chain around that company and flags every assumption the problem leaves for you to decide. Where the section stages its data, say which parts are still to come.
AC298 Unit 2 questions, answered
How detailed should a capstone proposal be?
Detailed enough that a stranger could predict the final submission from it. That usually means naming the business, the period, each deliverable and its inputs, and the assumptions the problem leaves open. It does not mean drafting entries or statements early. Three or four pages is common, though your section's instructions set the real limit.
Can I change an assumption after the proposal is graded?
Usually, provided the change is disclosed and applied everywhere. If the depreciation method changes in a later unit, note the change, the reason and every figure it touches, then update the reference sheet. What costs points is a silent change, where the statements use one method and the memo quotes a number computed under the other.
What if my section has not released the full problem yet?
Many sections stage the data, so the proposal often works from a profile and a list of expected outputs. Scope what is known, list what is still to come, and write the dependency chain in general terms that will hold once the figures arrive. The sample follows the same approach, marking each placeholder so it can be filled later.