| Course | PU615 Grant Writing for Health Promotion Projects |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 7 |
| Paper type | Budget and justification |
| Length | About 950 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | Master of Public Health (MPH) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PU615 Unit 7
Two Hundred Twenty-Six Thousand Nine Hundred Six Dollars, With the Arithmetic Printed: A Unit 7 Budget and Justification Setting a Composite Rural Project Into Federal Object Classes, Including the Cap That Costs the County Nine Thousand
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
PU615: Grant Writing for Health Promotion Projects
Unit 7 Budget and Justification
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Brackley County, its salaries and its quotes are composite; the object classes, the indirect cap and the research cited are real.
Personnel, 71,420 Dollars
1. Project coordinator, 0.4 full-time equivalent. Annual salary 74,000 dollars; 0.4 is 29,600. Already employed by the county at 0.6 on an unrelated award; the split is documented by time and effort records, and no part of the other award supports this project.
2. Outreach worker A, 0.5 full-time equivalent. Annual 46,000; 0.5 is 23,000. New position, hired locally.
3. Outreach worker B, 0.5 full-time equivalent. Annual 37,640 at the county's entry step; 0.5 is 18,820.
Fringe Benefits, 24,640 Dollars
Calculated at the county's audited rate of 34.5 percent of salaries. Shown as 71,420 times 0.345, which is 24,640. The rate letter is attached rather than asserted.
Travel, 14,880 Dollars
1. Outreach visits: 220 visits a year at an average round trip of 38 miles, which is 8,360 miles, at the federal mileage rate of 0.67 dollars, giving 5,601.
2. Installer coordination and verification photography: 140 trips at 26 miles, 3,640 miles, giving 2,439.
3. Dealer days and cooperative meetings: 9 events, two staff, 110 miles average, 1,980 miles, giving 1,327.
4. One grantee meeting out of state: two travelers, airfare 420 each, lodging two nights at 158, per diem 79 a day for three days, totaling 2,044.
5. Vehicle use contingency at 10 percent of the above, 1,141, with the remainder of the line, 2,328, held for a second grantee meeting if required.
Equipment, 11,400 Dollars
One enclosed retrofit demonstration trailer, quoted at 11,400 dollars. This exceeds the notice's 5,000 dollar per-unit threshold, so prior approval is requested in the narrative rather than assumed. Justification: the trailer carries a cut-away tractor cab and a fitted structure to dealer days and cooperative meetings, which is the program's central outreach mechanism on the evidence that visible local adoption moves installation more than information does (Sorensen et al., 2008).
Supplies, 6,310 Dollars
Printed flyers and agreements 1,240; two laptops at 1,180 each, under the equipment threshold and therefore supplies, 2,360; camera with macro capability for serial number photographs 740; office supplies 1,970. The camera is a 740 dollar line that protects 134,000 dollars of cost-share payments, because an unverified installation is a disallowed cost.
Contractual, 84,000 Dollars
Cost-share payments to enrolled installers: 70 installations in year one at an average of 1,200 dollars installed cost, with the program paying an average of 70 percent, which is 840 per installation, times 70, giving 58,800. Second-year commitment is budgeted separately. Installer enrollment and training stipends, three at 1,200, giving 3,600. The remaining 21,600 is the reserve for higher-cost models, with the per-operator cap unchanged.
Other, 7,600 Dollars
Participant referral payments, 50 dollars each, 40 budgeted, giving 2,000, which sits at the notice's maximum per participant. Evaluation consultant, 40 hours at 95 dollars, giving 3,800. Audit allocation 1,800.
Indirect Charges, 6,656 Dollars
Modified total direct costs are 66,560 dollars after excluding equipment and the contractual amounts above 25,000 as the notice directs. At the capped 10 percent, indirect is 6,656. The county's negotiated rate is 23.8 percent, which would have produced 15,841, so the cap costs the county 9,185 dollars of recovery. The justification states this plainly and identifies the general fund as absorbing it, because a reviewer who finds an applicant quietly over the cap stops reading.
In-Kind Contributions, Named and Valued
1. Extension agricultural educator, 0.15 of a state-funded position, valued at 11,700. No award funds support this salary.
2. Extension office space and two vehicles, valued at 8,400, with the funding source identified.
3. Volunteer fire district demonstration time, 9 events, valued at 2,700.
Each in-kind line names its source because the notice's prohibition on replacing existing support reaches facilities as well as salaries, and an unexplained in-kind entry invites exactly that question.
What the Second Year Looks Like, and Why It Is Not the Same
A two-year budget is not one year doubled, and the justification says where the two differ. Personnel stays flat except for a 2 percent step increase, 1,428 dollars. Travel falls by about 2,000 because the out-of-state grantee meeting occurs once. Equipment is zero in year two, removing 11,400. Supplies fall to 2,100, since laptops and the camera are bought once. Contractual rises from 84,000 to 98,400, because the installation pace is planned to be heaviest in months thirteen to twenty-one and because the cost-share reserve carries forward. Indirect recalculates on the new modified base. Year two totals 214,880 dollars, and the two-year request is 441,786. Stating the shape of year two inside the year-one justification answers the question a reviewer asks about whether a program front-loads equipment and then underspends, and it shows that the money follows the installations rather than the staffing. Protective structures fitted with belts are close to fully effective in an overturn, so the budget's purpose is to maximize completed installations rather than to distribute activity evenly across the award (Murphy et al., 2010).
Year One Total and What It Buys
226,906 dollars, of which 84,000 is money that goes onto tractors through installers and 71,420 is the people who find the operators. The ratio is deliberate and is defended in the narrative: without the outreach half, evaluated programs show the incentive alone moving far fewer installations than the budget assumes (Sorensen et al., 2011).
References
Murphy, D. J., Myers, J., McKenzie, E. A., Cavaletto, R., May, J., & Sorensen, J. (2010). Tractors and rollover protection in the United States. Journal of Agromedicine, 15(3), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2010.484309
Sorensen, J. A., Jenkins, P. L., Emmelin, M., Stenlund, H., Weinehall, L., & Earle-Richardson, G. B. (2011). The social marketing of safety behaviors: A quasi-randomized controlled trial of tractor retrofitting incentives. American Journal of Public Health, 101(4), 678-684. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.200162
Sorensen, J. A., May, J., Ostby-Malling, R., Lehmen, T., Strand, J., Stenlund, H., Weinehall, L., & Emmelin, M. (2008). Encouraging the installation of rollover protective structures in New York State: The design of a social marketing intervention. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 36(8), 859-869. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494808081653
The Purdue Global PU615 Unit 7 instructions
Unit 7 commonly asks for a detailed budget and a narrative justification for the proposal you have been developing. Use the funder's categories; for federal notices that usually means personnel, fringe, travel, equipment, supplies, contractual, other and indirect. Show how every figure was calculated, with rates, hours, quantities and unit costs. Make sure each line connects to an activity in your methods and a target in your objectives. Apply the notice's rules on equipment thresholds, indirect caps and participant incentives, and say where prior approval is needed. List in-kind contributions separately, valued and with their sources named. Many instructors also want a second-year budget or a description of how costs change. Check that the totals in the table, the narrative and the abstract agree before submitting the assignment.
Inside the PU615 Unit 7 example
The sample presents each object class as a heading with its total, then itemizes the lines beneath. Personnel shows three positions with salaries and full-time fractions, including a note that the coordinator's other award supports none of this work. Fringe is shown as a multiplication against an audited rate. Travel is built from visit counts, round-trip miles and the federal mileage rate. The trailer is justified by the outreach evidence on visible adoption, and a highlighted line notes that a 740 dollar camera protects 134,000 dollars of payments. Contractual explains the cost-share calculation and a reserve for costly models. The indirect section calculates the modified base, applies the cap and reports the unrecovered amount. In-kind lines, a year-two outline and a closing ratio of tractors to people follow.
Reading the PU615 Unit 7 grading rubric
Purdue Global budget assignments are generally graded on accuracy and justification. Points go first to arithmetic that a reader can verify and totals that match across the table and narrative. A strong share of credit follows compliance with the notice's rules: correct object classes, the indirect cap, equipment thresholds and incentive limits. Instructors reward justifications that tie each cost to a specific activity or objective, since an unexplained figure suggests padding. Treating in-kind contributions transparently, with values and sources, earns marks, as does addressing supplanting where personnel are shared. A budget that is reasonable for the work described scores better than one that is merely detailed. The last few points cover tidy tables, plain sentences and APA references, so label every table and keep the narrative in the same order.
PU615 Unit 7 help from the desk
The most common error is a lump-sum line, such as outreach costs, with no quantity or rate behind it. Break every figure into its parts. Students also apply their organization's negotiated indirect rate when the notice caps it lower, which overstates the request and signals that the notice was not read. Check the definitions of equipment and supplies, because a laptop under the threshold belongs in supplies. Watch participant incentive limits. Another slip is listing staff who already have other funding without explaining their time split, which invites a supplanting question. Make sure the numbers in your objectives and methods appear unchanged in the budget, and recalculate everything after each revision. Share your activities and the notice's rules with us, and we will build the budget table and justification to match them line by line.
Get a PU615 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
Attach the PU615 Unit 7 prompt, the funder's budget form or categories, and the activities and staffing from the methods section. The free first custom sample, delivered within 24-48 hours, prices each line from quantity and rate, explains category choices such as equipment and indirect costs, and foots to the cent. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More PU615 papers and MPH samples
- PU615 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- PU615 Unit 2: Solicitation Analysis
- PU615 Unit 3: Need Statement
- PU615 Unit 4: Goals and Objectives
- PU615 Unit 5: Methods Narrative
- PU615 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- PU615 Unit 8: Evaluation Section
- PU615 Unit 9: Reviewer Critique
- PU615 Unit 10: Complete Grant Proposal
- PU605 Unit 7: Stakeholder Engagement Plan
- PU580 Unit 7: Water Contamination Analysis
- PU570 Unit 7: Surveillance Data Analysis
- PU565 Unit 7: Survey Instrument Design
PU615 Unit 7 questions, answered
What is modified total direct cost?
It is the base to which many indirect rates apply under federal rules. It starts from total direct costs and removes certain items, most commonly equipment, patient care, rent, tuition and participant support costs, plus the portion of any subaward above a set amount. Showing that subtraction line by line is what lets a reviewer confirm your indirect figure.
Should in-kind contributions appear in the budget?
Usually below the requested total and clearly labeled, unless the funder requires cost sharing and specifies where to show it. Listing donated space, staff time or services demonstrates community commitment, but mixing them into the request inflates it and leaves reviewers unsure what the funder is actually being asked to pay for.
How precise do the figures need to be?
Precise enough to recalculate. Show hours and rates rather than annual lump sums, carry cents where the arithmetic produces them, and make sure the table, the justification and the narrative use identical numbers. A small inconsistency between sections suggests the budget was built apart from the plan, which is exactly the suspicion reviewers read for.
Where can I find a free PU615 Unit 7 sample paper?
The complete Unit 7 budget and justification for Rollbars for Brackley is on this page, with every object class itemized and the indirect cap calculated.
Is a laptop equipment or supplies in a federal budget?
Usually supplies. Federal rules treat items below the per-unit equipment threshold, commonly 5,000 dollars, as supplies even if they last several years. Check the notice for its own figure.