PS377 Unit 5 Co-Occurring Disorders Paper Example

Reviewed by Romilly Dunmore, MEd Models of Peer Recovery Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Ten weeks into sobriety, a veteran stopped walking his neighbor's dog, slept until noon and described recovery as being "in a gray room," changes this PS377 Unit 5 co-occurring disorders paper treats as signs for referral. The composite peer specialist in training names what she saw in plain words, avoids labeling it, and walks Ray to his counselor and to a VA clinic he had avoided for years, with a fellow veteran peer meeting him in the lobby. Assessment finds depression and post-traumatic stress disorder alongside alcohol use disorder. O'Connell and colleagues' trial of skills training with peer support, Davidson and colleagues' review and Eddie and colleagues' review frame the peer role. Purdue Global PS 377, Models of Peer Recovery, assigns this paper within the BS in Psychology.

CoursePS377 Models of Peer Recovery
UnitUnit 5
Paper typeCo-occurring disorders paper
LengthAbout 1,120 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Psychology
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PS377 Unit 5

1

Sober, Sleeping Until Noon and Not Walking the Dog: A PS377 Unit 5 Co-Occurring Disorders Paper

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

PS377: Models of Peer Recovery

Unit 5 Co-Occurring Disorders Paper

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The writer, the center, the participant and every detail are composite and illustrative; the articles cited are real.

What this part is doingOpening with ordinary changes a peer could notice shows recognition of co-occurring disorders as part of daily peer work.
2

The Signs

Ray, forty-eight, had been sober for ten weeks when I noticed the changes. He had written in his recovery plan that walking his neighbor's dog was one of his best tools, and he stopped. He missed two Tuesday veterans' meetings. When I called, he answered at noon and said he had just gotten up. At the center that Friday, he said, "Everybody told me I'd feel better sober. I feel like I'm in a gray room." He also mentioned nightmares about his deployment, which he said had come back since he stopped drinking.

Some low mood in early recovery is common. But Ray's changes lasted more than two weeks, affected his daily routine and his recovery activities, and came with nightmares tied to his military service. Those are signs that a professional should assess for a mental health condition alongside his alcohol use disorder.

What Co-Occurring Disorders Are

A co-occurring disorder means that a person has a substance use disorder and a mental health disorder at the same time. The combination is common, and each condition can make the other worse. Alcohol can mask symptoms of depression or trauma, which may surface when drinking stops, and untreated mental health symptoms can increase the risk of relapse.

Noticing and Referring, Not Diagnosing

My role is to notice, share what I see and connect, not to diagnose. I told Ray what I had observed, in plain words: "You stopped walking Buster, you've missed two meetings and you told me you feel like you're in a gray room. And the nightmares came back. I think it's worth telling your counselor and the VA." I did not tell him he had depression or post-traumatic stress disorder; I do not know that, and labeling it would be outside my role.

He agreed. With his consent, I called his outpatient counselor, who scheduled an assessment for the following Monday, and I helped him make an appointment at the VA mental health clinic, which he had avoided for years. I went with him to the VA's front desk because, he said, "I'll turn around in the parking lot otherwise."

My job was to say what I saw in plain words, then get him to someone who could say what it meant.

What this part is doingShowing the exact words used to share observations demonstrates referral without diagnosis.
3

Why Ray Had Avoided Help

Ray's reluctance about the VA was not stubbornness. He told me that after his discharge he had waited months for an appointment, felt rushed when he finally got one and left with a prescription he never filled. Like many veterans, he also worried that admitting to nightmares would make him look weak in front of other men from his unit. Knowing this changed how I supported the referral. I asked the VA's peer support specialist, a Marine veteran in recovery himself, to meet Ray in the lobby, and I let Ray decide what to say in his first appointment. A referral that ignores why someone has stayed away from care often leads to the same parking lot turnaround he described. Working with another peer, one who shared his military background, did what my own story could not.

When Sobriety Uncovers Symptoms

Ray's experience is common enough that our center now mentions it at every intake. People who used alcohol or drugs to blunt painful feelings or memories may find those feelings sharper in early recovery, and some take that as a sign that recovery is failing. Hearing in advance that symptoms may surface, and that they can be treated, gives participants a way to name what is happening instead of drinking to quiet it.

Evidence for Peer Support With Co-Occurring Disorders

O'Connell et al. (2020) studied adults with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders who were randomly assigned to usual care, to a skills training intervention, or to skills training combined with peer recovery support. Adding peer support to skills training produced better outcomes on some measures than usual care, including reductions in alcohol use, suggesting that peers add value alongside structured clinical interventions for this population.

Davidson et al. (2012) brought together research and practice experience on peers working alongside people with serious mental illness. They found that peers can deliver services with outcomes similar to those of other staff, and that peer support may add particular benefits in hope, engagement and a sense of being understood. Eddie et al. (2019), reviewing peer recovery support for substance use disorders, found that connecting people to treatment and other services is among the roles peers fill most often.

Ray's Assessment and Plan

His counselor and the VA clinician assessed him over two weeks. They diagnosed a depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder alongside his alcohol use disorder. His treatment now includes a trauma-focused therapy at the VA and a medication his VA psychiatrist prescribed, coordinated with his outpatient counselor. He gave me permission to know the diagnoses so that I could support his plan.

Adjusting Peer Support

My support changed in three ways. I learned more about how depression and trauma affect recovery, through training my supervisor arranged. I updated Ray's recovery plan with him, adding his new warning signs, such as sleeping past ten and avoiding the dog, and his VA appointments. And I connected him to a peer-led group for veterans with both substance use and trauma histories, where he could hear from others who had been through the same thing.

What I Would Do Differently

I noticed Ray's signs about two weeks after they began, mostly because he missed meetings. In hindsight, his recovery plan already listed walking the dog as a daily anchor; I could have asked about it in every check-in. I now ask participants about their daily anchors each time we talk.

Limits and Safety

If Ray had said anything about wanting to die or not being around, the response would have been different and immediate, following the crisis steps covered in a later unit. Peers must know the difference between signs that call for a referral this week and signs that call for help today.

What this part is doingSeparating routine referral from crisis response shows awareness of the limits of peer judgment.
4

Conclusion

Ray's gray room, nightmares and dropped routines were signs that called for professional assessment, which found depression and post-traumatic stress disorder alongside his alcohol use disorder. Naming observations in plain words and connecting him to care, rather than diagnosing, kept the peer role clear. O'Connell and colleagues, Davidson and colleagues and Eddie and colleagues support peer support alongside clinical care for co-occurring disorders.

5

References

Davidson, L., Bellamy, C., Guy, K., & Miller, R. (2012). Peer support among persons with severe mental illnesses: A review of evidence and experience. World Psychiatry, 11(2), 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.009

Eddie, D., Hoffman, L., Vilsaint, C., Abry, A., Bergman, B., Hoeppner, B., Weinstein, C., & Kelly, J. F. (2019). Lived experience in new models of care for substance use disorder: A systematic review of peer recovery support services and recovery coaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1052. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052

O'Connell, M. J., Flanagan, E. H., Delphin-Rittmon, M. E., & Davidson, L. (2020). Enhancing outcomes for persons with co-occurring disorders through skills training and peer recovery support. Journal of Mental Health, 29(1), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2017.1294733

What the PS377 Unit 5 assignment asks for

Unit 5 of PS377 focuses on recognizing possible co-occurring disorders and referring well. Describe a composite participant's changes in mood, sleep, routine or memories, and explain why they warranted professional assessment. Show the exact words you would use to share observations without diagnosing. Explain why the participant may have avoided care and how the referral addressed it. Summarize research on peer support for co-occurring disorders and on linkage as a peer role. Describe how support changed after the assessment, what you would do differently, and how routine referral differs from a crisis. Plan for roughly five APA pages, with participants composite and every detail illustrative. Describe who met the participant at intake.

Inside the PS377 Unit 5 example

The paper opens with ordinary changes a peer noticed. A section lists Ray's signs and explains why they called for assessment. A section defines co-occurring disorders. A section shows the plain words used to share observations, under a highlighted line about saying what was seen and getting him to someone who could say what it meant. Sections explain why Ray avoided the VA, how sobriety can uncover symptoms, and what O'Connell, Davidson and Eddie and their colleagues found. Sections describe his assessment and plan, changes to peer support, what the writer would do differently and the line between referral and crisis, before the conclusion. Every observation is reported in the words used with Ray.

Where the points sit in the PS377 Unit 5 rubric

Those marking this paper look for signs described as observations, with referral rather than diagnosis. The exact words used with the participant should be shown. Understanding why someone avoided care, and adjusting the referral, demonstrates skill. Research on peer support alongside clinical treatment should be summarized accurately. Changes to peer support after assessment, such as updated warning signs, show integration. An honest note on what was noticed late shows reflection. Distinguishing routine referral from crisis response shows safety awareness. APA citations and composite participants are expected throughout. Showing which observation prompted the referral, and when, usually earns strong credit. Explaining how another peer helped with the referral also adds depth.

PS377 Unit 5 help: mistakes that cost points

Co-occurring disorders papers often diagnose the participant in the peer's voice, which is outside the role. Others describe symptoms vaguely, such as "seemed down," without observable detail. Students frequently skip why the person avoided care, so the referral repeats an old failure. The difference between a referral this week and help today is commonly missing. Before submitting, rewrite every label as an observation. Quote what you said to the participant. Add one reason the participant might resist the referral and how you addressed it. State what would make the situation a crisis. Remove any diagnosis not made by a clinician. Then check every sentence for a hidden diagnosis.

Get a PS377 Unit 5 example written to your instructions

Send the case and the instructions with the rubric. A custom paper covers co-occurring disorders and peer referral. Turnaround is 24-48h, free for a first request. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More PS377 papers and BS in Psychology samples

PS377 Unit 5 questions, answered

What are co-occurring disorders?

A substance use disorder and a mental health disorder present together.

Do peers diagnose co-occurring disorders?

No. They notice signs and refer for professional assessment.

What helps people with co-occurring disorders?

Integrated treatment, skills training and peer support.

Where can I find a free PS377 Unit 5 sample paper?

This page holds the complete PS377 Unit 5 paper on noticing and referring a composite veteran's co-occurring disorders.

Did the peer diagnose depression in the PS377 Unit 5 sample?

No. She described what she observed and connected Ray to his counselor and the VA, who assessed and diagnosed him.