| Course | PS220 Child and Adolescent Psychology |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 7 |
| Paper type | Early childhood cognition and language paper |
| Length | About 520 words, 4 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PS220 Unit 7
The Crayon Box Full of Candles: A PS220 Unit 7 Early Childhood Cognition and Language Paper
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
PS220: Child and Adolescent Psychology
Unit 7 Early Childhood Cognition and Language Paper
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Maya and the task observations are composite; the research cited is real.
Conservation: Taller Means More
When Maya was four, her mother filled a pair of matching short glasses to the same line and Maya agreed they were the same. Then her mother poured one into a tall, thin glass while she watched. Asked which had more, Maya pointed to the tall glass. Asked why, she said, "It's higher." Piaget would say she had not yet grasped conservation, that an amount survives a change of container (Piaget & Inhelder, 1969). Preoperational children center on one striking feature, here height, and do not yet coordinate it with width or mentally reverse the pouring. Children typically master liquid conservation in middle childhood.
False Belief: Knowing What Others Think
Her preschool teacher, who was taking a child development class, tried another task. She showed Maya a crayon box and asked what was inside; Maya said crayons. The teacher opened it to reveal birthday candles, closed it and asked what her friend Diego, who had not seen inside, would think was in the box. Maya said, "Crayons, but it's really candles." She then correctly said that before she looked, she had thought it held crayons too.
This is a version of the false-belief tasks developed to test theory of mind, the understanding that others have beliefs that may differ from reality. Wimmer and Perner (1983) found that most three-year-olds in their story-based task predicted that a character would act on what the child knew rather than on the character's mistaken belief, while most children by five or six answered correctly. Maya's answer shows she understood that Diego's belief would come from what he had seen.
Maya could not yet see that the juice stayed the same, but she could see that Diego would think the box held crayons.
Language in Two Languages
At four, Maya's English and Spanish had both grown. Counted separately, she knew fewer English words than her monolingual cousin. Counted together, her vocabulary was comparable, which matches research on bilingual toddlers showing that vocabulary in each language reflects the share of input in that language while total vocabulary is similar to monolinguals' (Hoff et al., 2012). Her code switching, using a Spanish word inside an English sentence, followed patterns rather than random mixing, typically filling a gap with the word she knew best.
Some research suggests bilingual experience may support aspects of executive function, such as switching attention, though findings have been mixed and debated (Bialystok, 2011). For Maya's family, the more practical finding is that bilingualism did not slow her overall language growth.
What the Tasks Show Together
Maya at four reasoned well about other people's minds but not yet about quantities that change shape. Her language was growing in two systems shaped by the people who spoke to her. Early childhood development is not one ladder but several, climbed at different paces.
References
Bialystok, E. (2011). Reshaping the mind: The benefits of bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(4), 229-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025406
Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., Rumiche, R., SeƱor, M., & Parra, M. (2012). Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 39(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000759
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
Reading the PS 220 Unit 7 instructions
PS220's seventh unit often asks how thinking and language develop in early childhood, using tasks such as conservation or false belief. Describe at least two tasks precisely, what the child sees, what is asked and what the child answers, and interpret each with theory and research. Explain what passing or failing each task reveals about the child's thinking. Address language development, including vocabulary and, where relevant, bilingual or dialect differences, with research rather than assumptions. Note where findings are debated. Draw a conclusion about how development in early childhood proceeds across domains. Cite Piaget, the original false-belief research and language studies in APA style, and keep the paper anchored in observed behavior.
How the PS 220 Unit 7 example is put together
The paper describes the juice test in detail, Maya's answer and Piaget's account of centering on height and failing to reverse the pour. The false-belief section presents the crayon box, Maya's prediction for Diego and her memory of her own earlier belief, then Wimmer and Perner's original task and age pattern, under a highlighted line contrasting the juice and the box. A language section reports separate and combined vocabularies with Hoff and colleagues and describes her code switching as patterned. Bialystok's executive function claims are presented as debated. The close argues that early childhood is several ladders climbed at different speeds. Each task is reported in Maya's own words before any theory is applied, which lets the reader judge the interpretation.
Reading the PS220 Unit 7 grading rubric
Papers in this unit earn credit for precise task descriptions and accurate interpretation. Instructors look for each task described clearly enough to repeat, with the child's actual answer, and for interpretations that match the research. Contrasting tasks the child passes and fails shows understanding that development is uneven. Language sections are valued when they use research on bilingual or dialect development rather than common worries. Noting debates, such as the bilingual executive function question, demonstrates critical reading. A conclusion about how development proceeds across domains integrates the observations. Original sources cited accurately complete the paper. Reporting a child's exact words, rather than a summary, makes the interpretation checkable and earns credit for care.
Common PS220 Unit 7 mistakes, and how to avoid them
The most common slip describes a task loosely and misreports the age at which children typically pass it. Another is presenting Piaget's stages as rigid, ignoring that children can pass some tasks earlier with simplified versions. Students often describe bilingual children as delayed when their combined vocabulary is typical. Debated findings are sometimes stated as settled. Some papers list tasks without interpreting what they reveal. Before submitting, describe each task step by step, report the child's words, compare your interpretation with the original study, count vocabulary across languages if relevant and note one finding that is still debated. Following those steps keeps the paper grounded in what the child actually did.
Get a PS220 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
Send the child's age or case and the instructions with the rubric. A custom paper explains cognitive and language development with research tasks. Delivery is within 24-48h, and a first paper is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More PS220 papers and BS in Psychology samples
- PS220 Unit 1: Developmental Question Board Post
- PS220 Unit 2: Developmental Theories Comparison
- PS220 Unit 3: Developmental Research Methods Paper
- PS220 Unit 4: Prenatal Development and Genetics
- PS220 Unit 5: Attachment and Temperament Paper
- PS220 Unit 6: Screen Time Debate Reflection
- PS220 Unit 8: Middle Childhood Development Paper
- PS220 Unit 9: Adolescent Development Paper
- PS220 Unit 10: Developmental Case Study
- PS115 Unit 7: Career Research by Degree Level
- PS215 Unit 7: Brain and Health Paper
- PS200 Unit 7: Language and Comprehension Paper
- PS210 Unit 7: Gestalt and Cognitive Revolution Paper
PS220 Unit 7 questions, answered
What is a false-belief task?
A test of whether a child understands that someone can hold a belief that differs from reality.
When do children usually pass it?
Around age four, though methods and cultures vary.
Does bilingualism slow language development?
Bilingual children may know fewer words in each language but similar totals across both.
Where can I find a free PS220 Unit 7 sample paper?
This page contains the complete PS220 Unit 7 paper on a composite four-year-old's conservation and false-belief answers and her bilingual vocabulary.
Why does Maya pass one task and fail another in the PS220 Unit 7 sample?
Development is uneven across domains; she understands others' beliefs before she understands that quantities survive changes in shape.