PS210 Unit 4 Psychoanalysis and Its Critics Paper Example

Reviewed by Romilly Dunmore, MEd History of Psychology Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Three accounts of anxiety are compared in this PS210 Unit 4 paper on psychoanalysis and its critics: Sigmund Freud's conflict between unconscious drives and defenses, Alfred Adler's struggle against childhood feelings of inferiority after his 1911 break, and Karen Horney's basic anxiety rooted in insecure relationships and culture, with her later tyranny of the should. Much of Freud's theory failed testing, but the critics' attention to what people believe about themselves passed to Ellis and Beck, both trained in psychoanalytic approaches. Purdue Global PS 210, History of Psychology, assigns this paper in the BS in Psychology course. A comparison section sets the three side by side.

CoursePS210 History of Psychology
UnitUnit 4
Paper typePsychoanalysis and its critics paper
LengthAbout 500 words, 4 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Psychology
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PS210 Unit 4

1

Freud, Adler and Horney on Where Anxiety Comes From: A PS210 Unit 4 Paper on Psychoanalysis and Its Critics

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

PS210: History of Psychology

Unit 4 Psychoanalysis and Its Critics Paper

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The thread connecting the theorists to modern therapy is the writer's own; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingNaming the three accounts and the one idea that survived in the lead shows the paper compares rather than summarizes.
2

Freud's Account

Sigmund Freud, a Viennese neurologist, built psychoanalysis on the premise that people are largely unaware of their own motives and that symptoms express conflicts between instinctual drives, especially sexual and aggressive ones, and the demands of conscience and reality. Anxiety signals that forbidden impulses threaten to surface, and defenses such as repression keep them out of awareness. Treatment, through free association and dream interpretation, aimed to bring the conflict into consciousness (Schultz & Schultz, 2016).

Adler's Revision

Alfred Adler, an early member of Freud's circle, left in 1911 over disagreements about the role of sexuality. His individual psychology held that people are driven less by sexual instinct than by the effort to overcome feelings of inferiority that begin in childhood, and that health shows itself in social interest, an active concern for the community one belongs to. Adler also emphasized each person's style of life, the characteristic set of beliefs and goals through which they interpret experience.

Horney's Challenge

Karen Horney, trained in psychoanalysis in Berlin, rejected Freud's account of women's development, arguing that what he described as biological envy reflected women's real social disadvantages. In New Ways in Psychoanalysis, she argued that neurosis grows from basic anxiety, the frightened loneliness of a child who feels unprotected among others, and that culture shapes what people fear and how they defend against it (Horney, 1939). In later work she described rigid, self-defeating inner demands, which she called the tyranny of the should (Horney, 1950).

Horney's tyranny of the should reads like an early description of the rigid beliefs cognitive therapists later targeted.

What this part is doingConnecting Horney's language to later cognitive therapy shows the comparison serves the paper's thread.
3

Comparing the Three

All three placed the source of anxiety in early experience and in processes outside full awareness. They differed on what drives those processes: instinct for Freud, the struggle against inferiority for Adler, insecure relationships and culture for Horney. Adler and Horney moved the explanation from biology toward beliefs, goals and social context, which made it easier to imagine changing the person's view of themselves rather than uncovering hidden drives.

What Survived

Freud's specific theories about psychosexual stages and dream symbols fared poorly when tested (Leahey, 2018), and psychoanalytic treatment was long and hard to evaluate. Two ideas survived in changed form. Unconscious processes are now studied in cognitive psychology as automatic thoughts and processing outside awareness. And Adler's style of life and Horney's tyranny of the should anticipated the belief systems that Albert Ellis and Aaron Beck, both trained in psychoanalytic approaches, would make central to rational emotive and cognitive therapy. The thread from psychoanalysis to cognitive behavioral therapy runs not through Freud's drives but through his critics' attention to what people believe about themselves.

What this part is doingLocating the surviving idea in the critics rather than in Freud sharpens the comparison's conclusion.
4

References

Horney, K. (1939). New ways in psychoanalysis. W. W. Norton.

Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle toward self-realization. W. W. Norton.

Leahey, T. H. (2018). A history of psychology: From antiquity to modernity (8th ed.). Routledge.

Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2016). A history of modern psychology (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.

The Purdue Global PS210 Unit 4 instructions

PS210's fourth unit often asks you to compare Freud's psychoanalysis with the revisions of followers and critics. Choose two or three theorists and set their accounts side by side on a single question, such as where anxiety comes from or what drives development, so the comparison has focus. Explain each account accurately, including where a critic disagreed with Freud and why. Evaluate how the theories fared when tested and identify what survived in changed form. Connect at least one idea to modern psychology. Cite the theorists' own books where you can, along with a history text, and avoid presenting psychoanalysis either as wholly discredited or as fully accepted, since its legacy is mixed and the paper should show that.

Inside the PS210 Unit 4 example

The paper begins with Freud's unconscious motives, defenses and free association. Adler follows with his 1911 departure, inferiority, social interest and style of life. Horney challenges Freud's view of women, describes basic anxiety in New Ways in Psychoanalysis and later the tyranny of the should, under a highlighted line linking that phrase to the rigid beliefs cognitive therapists target. A comparison section shows all three locating anxiety in early experience while moving from instinct toward belief and culture. The last section reports that Freud's stages and dream symbols fared poorly, citing Leahey, and that unconscious processes and the critics' focus on beliefs survived through Ellis and Beck.

PS210 Unit 4 rubric: what earns full points

Comparison papers earn their points through a shared question applied to every theorist. Instructors look for each account explained accurately, especially the specific point on which a critic broke with Freud. Evaluation matters: noting which claims failed testing and which ideas survived shows mature historical judgment rather than either dismissal or reverence. Connecting a surviving idea to modern therapy demonstrates the course's emphasis on influence. Citing the theorists' own works, even briefly, adds weight. A clear structure, with a comparison section rather than three separate summaries, is expected. Accurate dates and titles, such as Horney's 1939 and 1950 books, show care with sources. Weighing Freud's legacy fairly, neither dismissing nor defending all of it, is part of the grade.

PS210 Unit 4 help from the desk

Many papers write three mini biographies and never compare the theorists on any question. Another frequent slip reduces Adler and Horney to Freud's disciples without explaining their disagreements. Students sometimes attribute ideas to the wrong book or the wrong decade. Psychoanalysis is often either dismissed as unscientific in one sentence or treated as current mainstream practice, both of which miss its mixed legacy. Connections to modern psychology tend to be vague. Before submitting, state the single question your comparison answers, write one sentence for each theorist's answer to it, add one sentence on how each answer fared, and name a modern practice that kept something from at least one of them.

Get a PS210 Unit 4 example written to your instructions

Share the theorists and the instructions with the rubric. A custom paper compares the theories and their influence. It arrives within 24-48h; first requests are free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More PS210 papers and BS in Psychology samples

PS210 Unit 4 questions, answered

Why did Adler break with Freud?

Adler emphasized social interest and feelings of inferiority rather than sexual drives.

What did Horney add?

She challenged Freud's view of women and stressed cultural and interpersonal sources of anxiety.

Is psychoanalysis still practiced?

Psychodynamic therapies continue, and some core ideas, such as unconscious processes, persist in modified form.

Where can I find a free PS210 Unit 4 sample paper?

The full PS210 Unit 4 paper is on this page, comparing Freud, Adler and Horney on the source of anxiety and tracing what survived into cognitive therapy.

What survived from psychoanalysis in the PS210 Unit 4 sample?

The study of unconscious processes and the critics' focus on people's beliefs about themselves, which later cognitive therapists built on.