| Course | NU804 DNP Project II |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 5 |
| Paper type | Seminar reflection |
| Length | About 850 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NU804 Unit 5
I Could Not Order the Hospitalists to Wait: A Unit 5 Seminar Reflection on Leading Change Without Authority
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NU804: DNP Project II
Unit 5 Seminar Reflection
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The seminar, hospitalists, classmates and events are composite; the sources cited are real.
The Problem
In the fifth week of implementation, the 3 West resource nurse told me that three patients that week had been discharged by mid-morning before giving a supervised dose on the pen going home. In each case the hospitalist had written the discharge order on early rounds, the bed was needed for an emergency department admission and the nurse had rushed the teaching or skipped it. The bundle cannot work if the patient leaves before the nurse can watch the injection.
I am a unit educator. I do not supervise hospitalists, and I cannot make them wait.
My First Response
My first response was a message to the hospitalist group's medical director, attaching the bundle's protocol and asking her to remind her physicians that patients on new insulin must complete the supervised dose before discharge. She replied politely that she would share it. Nothing changed. The next week, two more patients left early.
Looking back, I treated the problem as a compliance problem and tried to borrow authority from someone who had it. That approach rested on the assumption that hospitalists knew the rule and were ignoring it. In fact, most of them had never heard of the bundle beyond one email at go-live.
What the Seminar Offered
The facilitator asked each of us to describe a change we were leading and the people whose cooperation we needed but could not require. Then she asked a second question: what does that group want that your change could give them?
I had no answer. A classmate, Imani, who leads a mobility project in a surgical unit, said that she had won over her surgeons only when she showed them data on length of stay, which they cared about, rather than data on falls, which they assumed nursing would handle. Another classmate pointed out that I was asking hospitalists to give up something they valued, a morning discharge, without offering anything in return.
I had asked the hospitalists to change for the bundle's sake, when the only reason they would change was their own.
What the Literature Helped Me See
Kotter (1995), looking at why large change efforts stall, names two errors I had made: telling too few people about the change, and building a coalition that leaves out those who control the work. I had communicated the bundle to nurses for months and to hospitalists in one email, and my coalition had no physician in it. Uhl-Bien et al. (2007) describe leadership in complex organizations as including enabling work that creates conditions for people to adapt, not only direction from formal positions. My role was not to command but to create the conditions in which hospitalists would choose to wait.
The AACN Essentials expect doctoral nurses to work in interprofessional partnerships and to lead within systems, using communication and collaboration rather than position alone (American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN], 2021). That was exactly the competency the week had tested and I had not yet shown.
The Conversation That Worked
I asked to attend the hospitalists' weekly meeting for ten minutes. I brought two things they cared about. The first was data on returns: of the patients who had come back with a glucose problem in the pilot year, most had been readmitted to the hospitalist service, often within a week. The second was a proposal that served their interest in early discharges: the supervised dose would be moved to the evening before the expected discharge for any patient on new insulin, flagged at the evening huddle, so a morning discharge would no longer conflict with teaching.
The discussion lasted twenty minutes, not ten. One hospitalist asked whether a patient who did well the evening before needed another dose observed in the morning. We agreed not, which made the change easier. Another offered to add a line to the discharge order set, "Supervised insulin dose completed," that the order cannot be signed without. The medical director, who had forwarded my first message without comment, said the group would take it to the order set committee.
What Changed
Over the next three weeks, no patient on the four units left without a supervised dose. The order set change is pending. The bigger change was in my approach. For each group the bundle depends on, pharmacy, case management, oncology, I am now writing down what they want, what the bundle asks of them and what it can offer in return before I ask for anything.
Closing Thought
I came to the seminar frustrated that I lacked the authority to fix a problem. I left understanding that authority would not have fixed it; the hospitalists would have complied on paper and found ways around the rule. What fixed it was asking what they needed and building the change around it.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2021). The essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing education. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Publications/Essentials-2021.pdf
Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
Reading the NU 804 Unit 5 instructions
The Unit 5 seminar usually asks how DNP students lead change among people who do not report to them, and the reflection applies that discussion to the student's own implementation. Expect to describe a specific situation in which you needed cooperation you could not require, what you first did and how well it worked. Show how something from the session, whether a peer's story, the facilitator's prompt or an assigned article, altered what you did next. Sources on change leadership or interprofessional practice support the analysis. Instructors look for action as well as insight, so describing what you did differently afterward strengthens the reflection. A closing section on what you will carry into the rest of the project is common. First-person writing, a respectful account of the other profession and a clear turning point are expected throughout.
Inside the NU804 Unit 5 example
The reflection begins with the problem: three patients in one week discharged by mid-morning before a supervised dose, and a writer who cannot make hospitalists wait. The first response, an email to the hospitalist director with the protocol attached, is described along with its failure and the mistaken assumption behind it. The seminar section reports the facilitator's question, a classmate's example about surgeons and the comment that hospitalists were being asked to give up something they valued, under a highlighted line about asking for change for the bundle's sake. Kotter, Uhl-Bien and colleagues and the AACN Essentials explain what went wrong. The conversation that worked is told in detail, from return data to the evening-before proposal and the order set line. A short section on results and a closing thought end the paper.
Reading the NU804 Unit 5 grading rubric
The rubric for this reflection tends to weight honesty about a failed first attempt, a clear account of how the seminar changed the student's thinking and evidence of different action afterward. A real situation with named groups and concrete events earns more than general reflections on leadership. Readings count when they shed light on what actually happened, such as a change model showing why one email was not enough. Respectful description of other professions is expected and is part of professional writing. Outcomes, even early ones, show the reflection led somewhere. Commitments for the rest of the project should be specific. Plain first-person prose within the length limit, with each reading listed in APA 7, completes the unit.
NU804 Unit 5 help from the desk
Reflections on leading without authority often turn into complaints about another profession, which costs points and misses the lesson. Others describe a success without the false start that preceded it, losing the movement the prompt looks for. Some students quote leadership models at length without connecting them to what happened. Vague outcomes, such as relationships improved, carry little weight without an example. Leaving out what the other group gained makes the story sound like persuasion rather than partnership. Commitments that cannot be checked, such as communicating more, add little. Start by naming the group whose cooperation you needed most and writing down what that group wants from its own work. Share that situation, and a reflection can be drafted around it.
Get an NU804 Unit 5 example written to your instructions
Share what the seminar covered, your implementation experience and the prompt with its rubric. A custom reflection connects the discussion to your project. The first one costs nothing, back within 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More NU804 papers and DNP samples
- NU804 Unit 1: DNP Go-Live Discussion Post
- NU804 Unit 2: DNP Staff Training Report
- NU804 Unit 3: Implementation Fidelity Report
- NU804 Unit 4: Barriers and Adaptations Memo
- NU804 Unit 6: Interim Data Report
- NU804 Unit 7: Stakeholder Update
- NU804 Unit 8: Unexpected Finding Discussion
- NU804 Unit 9: Leadership Reflection
- NU804 Unit 10: Implementation Summary
- NU803 Unit 5: Measurement Plan, Seven Measures
- NU813 Unit 5: Discussion Board Post
- NU802 Unit 5: Practice Mentor Seminar Reflection
- NU823 Unit 5: Author Guideline Audit
NU804 Unit 5 questions, answered
What if I missed the NU804 seminar?
Most sections offer a written alternative. Check its instructions.
What is leading without authority?
Influencing a change through relationships, data and credibility rather than through a position that can require it.
Should the reflection describe a failure?
Often, yes. A specific setback with what you learned is stronger than a success story.
Where can I find a free NU804 Unit 5 sample paper?
The complete NU804 Unit 5 seminar reflection is available here, describing how a DNP student failed and then succeeded in gaining hospitalists' cooperation with an insulin discharge bundle.
What did the student offer hospitalists in the NU804 Unit 5 sample?
Return data showing most glucose readmissions came back to their service, and a change that fit their rounds: the supervised dose moved to the evening before an expected morning discharge.