NU733 Unit 1 Issue Analysis, Homelessness Deaths Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Ethics, Policy, and Advocacy for Population Health Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NU733 Unit 1 sample is an issue analysis of deaths and cold injury among people experiencing homelessness in composite Port Hadley, a Great Lakes city of about 280,000, where deaths rose from 38 in 2019 to 71 in 2024, nine of them from hypothermia. It was prepared for Purdue Global NU 733, Ethics, Policy, and Advocacy for Population Health, a DNP course. The paper keeps ethical language out until the last section. It sets out medical examiner deaths by cause, the point-in-time count beside the coordinated entry list, shelter capacity, frostbite admissions and a rough, unadjusted death rate, each with its limits, and only then poses four ethical questions that the rest of the course takes up.

CourseNU733 Ethics, Policy, and Advocacy for Population Health
UnitUnit 1
Paper typeIssue analysis
LengthAbout 1,100 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramDoctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NU733 Unit 1

1

Seventy-One Deaths, Nine From Cold: An Issue Analysis of Mortality and Cold Injury Among People Experiencing Homelessness in Composite Port Hadley, With the Numbers First and the Ethical Questions Last

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU733: Ethics, Policy, and Advocacy for Population Health

Unit 1 Issue Analysis

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Port Hadley and every local figure are composite; numbers are bracketed placeholders for the values the named local sources would supply.

What this part is doingThe paper keeps ethical language out until the last section, so the facts are established before anyone argues about them.
2

Deaths

The county medical examiner records deaths of people known to be experiencing homelessness at the time of death. From [2019] through [2024], the annual count rose from [38] to [71]. In [2024], overdose caused [41] of the [71] deaths, hypothermia [9], trauma [8] and medical causes the remaining [13]. Overdose has been the largest single cause in every year since [2020].

The pattern resembles what has been found elsewhere. A study of homeless adults in Boston over fifteen years found that drug overdose, cancer and heart disease were the leading causes of death, with overdose accounting for a third of deaths among adults under 45 and opioids implicated in most overdoses (Baggett et al., 2013). A review of health among homeless people in high-income countries described markedly higher mortality than in the general population, driven by infectious disease, substance use, mental illness and chronic conditions often diagnosed late (Fazel et al., 2014).

The medical examiner's count has limits. It depends on investigators recording housing status, which is sometimes unknown, and deaths of people who were recently housed or staying with others may be missed. The count is therefore more likely to be low than high.

How Many People Are Homeless

The federal point-in-time count, taken on one night in late January, found [1,904] people homeless in Port Hadley in [January 2025], [612] of them unsheltered. The county's coordinated entry list, which records everyone assessed for housing services over a year, shows [1,140] people who were unsheltered at some point in [2024]. The two figures answer different questions. The point-in-time count is a snapshot of one cold night, when some people who usually sleep outside find shelter; the annual list captures movement in and out of homelessness. Using only the snapshot would understate how many people experience unsheltered homelessness over a year.

Cold Injury

The county hospital recorded [23] admissions for frostbite among patients experiencing homelessness over the [2024 to 2025] winter, and [11] of them ended in amputation of fingers or toes. Most occurred on nights when the temperature fell well below freezing, which matches research elsewhere. In Toronto, a study of hypothermic events among homeless individuals found that the odds of an event rose by about 1.64 times for every 5 degrees Celsius drop in the day's minimum temperature (Zhang et al., 2019). Hospital data capture only those who reached the hospital; cold injuries treated in the field or not treated at all are missing.

Shelter Capacity

The city's emergency shelters had [1,180] year-round beds in [2024], plus [150] seasonal beds opened when the overnight temperature is forecast below [15] degrees Fahrenheit. On the point-in-time night, [1,292] people were sheltered, which exceeded year-round capacity and filled most seasonal beds. Occupancy data from the two largest shelters show that single-adult beds were full on [81] percent of winter nights, while family units had occasional vacancies. Outreach logs for the same winter record [340] occasions on which a person declined an available shelter bed, and the reasons given, which Unit 4 will examine, included separation from a partner, rules about pets and curfews that conflict with night work.

Capacity figures matter to this analysis because they limit what any enforcement policy can achieve. If beds are full on most winter nights, moving people from one outdoor location to another does not move them indoors. The figures also show that the problem is not only the number of beds but whether available beds fit the people who need them.

How the Count Has Changed

The rise from [38] to [71] deaths did not occur evenly. Deaths were roughly flat from [2019] to [2021], then rose sharply in [2022] and [2023], the same years in which the county's overall overdose deaths increased and the unsheltered count grew by about [40] percent. Hypothermia deaths ranged from [three] to [nine] a year without a clear trend, but the [nine] in [2024] followed a winter with [eleven] nights below zero degrees Fahrenheit, more than in any of the previous five winters. Year-to-year changes in small counts should be read with caution, since a difference of a few deaths can reflect chance.

A Rough Comparison of Death Rates

Dividing the [71] deaths by the [1,140] people on the annual unsheltered list, or by a broader estimate that includes people in shelters, gives a crude death rate far above the city's adult rate of about [1,050] per 100,000. Using the annual list alone yields about [6,200] per 100,000. That figure is unadjusted for age, sex or the true size of the population at risk, which is uncertain, and it should be labeled as a rough indicator of scale rather than a precise rate. Because the homeless population is younger on average than the city's adults, an age-adjusted comparison would likely show an even larger gap.

The numbers show a rising count of deaths, most of them preventable, and a winter that cost eleven people part of their hands or feet.

What this part is doingEach data section ends with the limits of its source, so the reader knows how far the numbers can be trusted.
3

What the Numbers Do Not Show

The data do not show why deaths rose between [2019] and [2024]. Possible explanations include a more potent drug supply, a growing unsheltered population, changes in shelter capacity and changes in how the medical examiner records housing status. The data also do not show which deaths might have been prevented by any particular policy. Those questions require analysis beyond counts.

Four Questions the Evidence Raises

Only now does the analysis turn to ethics, because the figures raise questions that data cannot answer.

First, what does a city owe people who sleep outside on nights cold enough to cost them fingers and toes? Second, when a public health measure such as clearing an encampment protects some residents, how should its costs to the people displaced be weighed? Third, who should decide how enforcement of camping laws is carried out, and whose voices are missing from those decisions? Fourth, when the most common cause of death is overdose, how should harm reduction be balanced against the goal of moving people indoors?

These questions shape the rest of the course, and each will be taken up with an ethical framework, the relevant law and the people with power to act.

What this part is doingThe four questions are posed rather than answered, which sets up later units without prejudging them.
4

References

Baggett, T. P., Hwang, S. W., O'Connell, J. J., Porneala, B. C., Stringfellow, E. J., Orav, E. J., Singer, D. E., & Rigotti, N. A. (2013). Mortality among homeless adults in Boston: Shifts in causes of death over a 15-year period. JAMA Internal Medicine, 173(3), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1604

Fazel, S., Geddes, J. R., & Kushel, M. (2014). The health of homeless people in high-income countries: Descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations. The Lancet, 384(9953), 1529-1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61132-6

Zhang, P., Wiens, K., Wang, R., Luong, L., Ansara, D., Gower, S., Bassil, K., & Hwang, S. W. (2019). Cold weather conditions and risk of hypothermia among people experiencing homelessness: Implications for prevention strategies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), Article 3259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183259

What the NU733 Unit 1 assignment asks for

The opening NU733 assignment asks you to analyze a population health issue by establishing its scope before arguing about it. Most versions expect counts and rates from named sources, trends over time, comparison figures, the limits of each source, and a closing set of questions the evidence raises for ethics and policy. Four to six pages, often with several tables, is the standard scope. Faculty reward analyses that separate facts from values, report where each number comes from, label unadjusted or rough figures as such, and pose questions rather than answering them early. Use local sources such as medical examiner reports, continuum of care data and hospital records where they exist, and be explicit about who is likely missing from each count.

How the NU 733 Unit 1 example is put together

The paper opens with medical examiner deaths by year and cause, with overdose the largest single cause, and places them beside published findings from Boston and a review of homeless health in high-income countries. The next section explains why the one-night count and the annual coordinated entry list answer different questions. Shelter capacity and refusals follow, then the timing of the rise in deaths, then frostbite admissions set beside a Toronto study of cold and hypothermia. A rough death rate is computed and labeled unadjusted. The highlighted sentence summarizes the facts, a section says what the numbers do not show, and the final section poses four ethical questions about cold, displacement, voice and harm reduction.

Reading the NU733 Unit 1 grading rubric

Issue analyses in this course are frequently judged on the use of data, accuracy about sources, analysis of trends, recognition of limits and the questions raised. Data use earns credit when figures are specific, dated and drawn from named sources. Accuracy covers how each source defines and counts the population. Trend analysis rewards attention to timing and to small counts that vary by chance. Limits are credited when every source's gaps are named, especially who is missing. The final criterion rewards questions that follow from the evidence and prepare later work, rather than a premature argument. Tables, APA citation and a clear separation between the factual sections and the ethical section usually complete the rubric.

NU733 Unit 1 help: mistakes that cost points

A common weakness is opening with a moral claim and choosing numbers to support it. Another is relying on a single one-night count, which understates how many people experience homelessness over a year. Some papers compute death rates without saying they are unadjusted or that the population size is uncertain. Others ignore the ways deaths are missed when housing status goes unrecorded. Many students cite national statistics without saying whether they apply locally. And closing sections often answer the ethical questions too quickly. Build the factual picture first, name each source's limits, compute only what the data support, and end with questions that the rest of your course can answer.

Get an NU733 Unit 1 example written to your instructions

Name the population problem your Unit 1 analysis covers and the place it concerns, then add the prompt and rubric. The free first custom sample, drafted to those instructions in 24-48h, rests on sourced counts and rates whose weaknesses are spelled out, and holds every ethical claim back until the numbers are in place. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More NU733 papers and DNP samples

NU733 Unit 1 questions, answered

Why does the issue analysis avoid ethics until the end?

Because an issue analysis is meant to establish the facts any later argument must respect. Starting with a principle tempts a writer to choose figures that support it. Describing magnitude, trend and distribution first, with honest limits, gives your later framework paper and policy work a shared base. Instructors in this course often grade the separation itself.

Is the point-in-time count reliable enough to use?

It is the standard federal measure and should be used, with its limits stated. It covers one night in January, depends on volunteers and weather, and misses people who are hidden, doubled up or in institutions. Pairing it with an annual measure such as a coordinated entry list or health system data gives a fuller picture of how many people are affected.

Can I use real local data for my own issue analysis?

Yes, and you should. Medical examiner reports, continuum of care data, hospital community health needs assessments and state vital records are common public sources. Cite each with its year. This sample uses a composite city so the figures are illustrative; your paper will be stronger for drawing on the documented numbers from your own community.

Where can I find a free NU733 Unit 1 sample paper?

The complete NU733 Unit 1 issue analysis appears on this page, covering deaths by cause, two ways of counting homelessness, shelter capacity, the timing of the rise, cold injury, a rough death rate, what the numbers do not show and four questions, plus three references. Help with an analysis of your own issue is available.

Why use both the point-in-time count and the annual list in NU733 Unit 1?

The one-night count is a snapshot of a cold January night, when some people find shelter; the coordinated entry list captures everyone assessed over a year. Using only the snapshot would understate how many people sleep outside at some point.