| Course | NU713 Epidemiology and Social Determinants of Population Health |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 10 |
| Paper type | Population health brief |
| Length | About 700 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NU713 Unit 10
Four Community Health Workers and One Evening Clinic: A Population Health Brief to a Composite Health Center's Chief Executive and Quality Committee on Diabetes in Brennard County's Most Deprived Block Groups
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NU713: Epidemiology and Social Determinants of Population Health
Unit 10 Population Health Brief
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The health center, county, costs and figures are composite; numbers are bracketed placeholders carried from earlier units.
Summary
Recommendation: fund four community health workers and extend hours to 8 p.m. two evenings a week at the [Eastgate] clinic, for adults with diabetes living in the county's most deprived block groups. First-year cost: $[412,000]. Decision needed: approval at the [March] budget meeting, so that hiring can begin in [April].
The Problem in Three Figures
First, after adjustment for age, diabetes-related deaths on the east side are [1.66] times the rate in the west suburbs. Second, admissions for short-term diabetes complications are about [3.5] times higher in the tracts with the most eviction filings than in those with the fewest. Third, [38] percent of our patients in the poorest block groups screen negative for every social need on PRAPARE, so screening alone will not find everyone at risk.
Behind these figures lie causes the center can reach and causes it cannot. Our clinics close at 5 p.m., when many east-side patients are at work on warehouse shifts without paid leave. Patients who move after an eviction lose track of insulin, supplies and appointments. And some patients do not report needs on a form but will discuss them with someone they trust.
The patients most likely to be admitted are often the ones our daytime clinics and paper screens are least likely to reach.
Three Options
Status quo. Continue daytime care and social needs screening as now. Cost: none new. Expected effect: admissions continue on their current trend, and the gap persists.
Screening with referral alone. Offer PRAPARE to every adult and refer those with needs to community agencies. Cost: about $[90,000] for staff time and a referral platform. Expected effect: better identification of needs among those who attend and report them, but no change for patients who do not attend or do not report, and no help with keeping care going through a move.
The recommended outreach model. Four community health workers, each carrying about [60] patients, who meet patients at home or in the community, help with social needs, and keep them connected to care through moves; plus evening hours at one site. Cost: $[412,000]. Expected effect: supported by evidence. In a randomized trial, a standardized community health worker program addressing unmet social needs was estimated to return $2.47 per dollar spent to a typical Medicaid payer within one fiscal year (Kangovi et al., 2020). Pooling nine trials with a year or more of follow-up, a meta-analysis reported a modest A1c benefit over usual care that grew with higher starting values, while cautioning that the number of trials was small (Palmas et al., 2015).
Measures
The primary measure is admissions for short-term diabetes complications among adults in the most deprived block groups, reported every six months in two ways: as a rate difference against the least deprived block groups, and as a rate ratio. Both are needed, because the two can disagree, as the county's heart failure data showed, and reporting only one could hide progress or overstate it. Secondary measures are A1c among enrolled patients, the share of evening visits used by patients from the target block groups, and the number of patients who kept insulin and appointments through a move.
Timeline
Hiring and training in [April through June]. Evening hours begin in [July]. First six-month report to the quality committee in [January]. A decision to continue, expand or stop at the [March] budget meeting a year from now, based on those results.
What the Center Cannot Change
The center cannot pass a paid sick leave law, change suburban zoning or stop evictions. It can offset some of their effects on our patients, and it can share its data with the county and with advocates working on those causes. The brief does not promise to close the gap; it proposes a measurable step toward it.
References
Kangovi, S., Mitra, N., Grande, D., Long, J. A., & Asch, D. A. (2020). Evidence-based community health worker program addresses unmet social needs and generates positive return on investment. Health Affairs, 39(2), 207-213. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00981
Palmas, W., March, D., Darakjy, S., Findley, S. E., Teresi, J., Carrasquillo, O., & Luchsinger, J. A. (2015). Community health worker interventions to improve glycemic control in people with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30(7), 1004-1012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3247-0
The Purdue Global NU713 Unit 10 instructions
The final NU713 assignment asks you to turn your population analysis into a brief for a decision maker. Most versions want a named audience, a recommendation and the decision needed up front, the problem in a few figures, options compared on cost and expected effect, measures, a timeline and limits. Two to four pages is common. Faculty reward briefs that lead with the request, carry specific figures from earlier work, cite evidence for the recommended option honestly, and choose measures able to show the effect of the change, including both absolute and relative measures of a disparity. Keep proposals for a live clinical site at the level of planning unless your program has approved a project there, and address the audience by role.
How the NU 713 Unit 10 example is put together
A summary opens the brief with the recommendation, cost and decision date. The problem follows in three figures carried from earlier units: the age-adjusted death ratio, admissions in high-eviction tracts and patients who screen negative despite deprivation, with causes the center can and cannot reach. The highlighted sentence names who the current model misses. Three options are compared: the status quo, screening with referral alone and the outreach model, the last supported by a randomized community health worker program with a return on investment to Medicaid and a meta-analysis showing a modest A1c benefit. Measures require both a rate difference and a rate ratio. A timeline sets hiring, evening hours, reporting and a decision a year later, and limits close the brief.
Reading the NU713 Unit 10 grading rubric
Population health briefs are commonly judged on audience and purpose, the problem statement, options and evidence, measures and feasibility. Audience earns credit when the brief names a decision maker by role and leads with the request. The problem criterion rewards a few specific, sourced figures rather than a long background. Options are judged on comparison against the same factors, with evidence cited accurately and its limits stated. Measures are credited when they are specific, reported on a schedule and able to show a disparity changing in both absolute and relative terms. Feasibility covers cost, timeline and an honest note on what the organization cannot change. A one-page summary box is often expected at the top of the brief.
Common NU713 Unit 10 mistakes, and how to avoid them
A common weakness is writing an essay rather than a brief, with the recommendation buried on the last page. Another is presenting only the recommended option, which gives the audience nothing to compare. Some briefs cite evidence as if it guaranteed results, without stating the size or limits of the effect. Others propose measures that cannot be collected or never say when results will be reported. Many ignore cost, which is the first question an executive will ask. And some promise to eliminate a disparity the organization cannot control. Lead with the decision, compare options fairly, attach real numbers to cost and time, and state what the proposal will not fix.
Get an NU713 Unit 10 example written to your instructions
Send the population and intervention your Unit 10 brief addresses, any of your earlier work it should build on, and the prompt and rubric. A free first custom sample is prepared to those instructions within 24-48h, recommendation first, with costs in brackets where only your organization knows the figures. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More NU713 papers and DNP samples
- NU713 Unit 1: Discussion Post, Eviction and Diabetes
- NU713 Unit 2: Social Determinants Profile
- NU713 Unit 3: Measurement Critique, ADI and PRAPARE
- NU713 Unit 4: Fundamental Cause Paper, Colon Cancer
- NU713 Unit 5: Seminar Reflection, Reference Groups
- NU713 Unit 6: Disparities Analysis, Heart Failure
- NU713 Unit 7: Age-Adjusted Rate Comparison, Diabetes
- NU713 Unit 8: Secondary Data Appraisal, CDC WONDER
- NU713 Unit 9: Structural Framework Application, WHO
- NU703 Unit 10: Doctoral Development Portfolio
NU713 Unit 10 questions, answered
Who should a population health brief be addressed to?
Someone who can approve or fund the recommendation, named by role: a health center's chief executive, a health system's population health committee or a county health officer. The prompt may specify the reader. If it does not, choose the person closest to the decision, because the options, costs and tone all depend on who is reading.
Can the brief recommend an intervention at my own clinical site?
It can describe one as preparatory writing, and many students do. Anything implemented at a live site, including data collected there and any project deliverable, belongs to you and your site processes. Sample briefs use composite organizations and public-style data, with site-specific figures left in brackets for you to supply from your own setting.
How long should a population health brief be?
Two to four pages is common, but the prompt decides. Order matters more than length: recommendation, evidence of scale, options, measures and limits, in that sequence. Someone who reads only page one should still leave knowing the request, its price and the reason behind it. Supporting analysis can move to an appendix rather than crowd the body.
Where can I find a free NU713 Unit 10 sample paper?
The complete NU713 Unit 10 population health brief is on this page, with a summary box, the problem in three figures, three options compared, evidence with limits, measures, a timeline and what the center cannot change, plus two references. A brief for your own decision maker can be requested.
Why measure both difference and ratio in NU713 Unit 10?
Because the two can disagree, as the county's heart failure analysis showed. Reporting only one could hide progress or overstate it, so the brief asks for both every six months to show the committee the full picture.