NU702 Unit 1 Evidence-Practice Gap Discussion Post Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Translating Evidence into Nursing Practice Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

A gap between 92 percent and 18 percent opens this NU702 Unit 1 discussion board post: discharge charts on two composite Dubuque medical-surgical units record diabetes education as complete for nearly every patient started on insulin, but a patient demonstration of the pen for fewer than one in five. Thirty-one of 214 such patients came back within a month with glucose problems. The writer, a unit educator beginning the DNP, uses Geller and colleagues' national estimate of insulin-related emergency visits and Healy and colleagues' readmission finding to show why the gap matters, then describes how a DNP-prepared nurse would define, measure and redesign the teaching. Purdue Global NU 702 starts the revised DNP plan with this kind of problem framing. The post closes with a one-month baseline count, and two replies question classmates' fall and sepsis data.

CourseNU702 Translating Evidence into Nursing Practice
UnitUnit 1
Paper typeDiscussion board post
LengthAbout 400 words, 2 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 discussion post
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramDoctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NU702 Unit 1

1

Ninety-Two Percent Charted, Eighteen Percent Shown: A Unit 1 Discussion Post on the Gap a DNP Nurse Would Close

NU702 · Unit 1 Discussion Board Post

Posted by [Student Name]

The hospital, units and figures are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingOpening with two percentages from the writer's own units signals the post will argue from local evidence.
2

Initial Post

I am the unit educator for 5 West and 6 West, 64 medical-surgical beds in a composite Dubuque, Iowa, hospital of about 260 beds. Last year, 214 patients on our two units went home on insulin that was new to them, and 31 of them, about one in seven, came back to the emergency department or were readmitted within 30 days for low or high blood sugar. Insulin is a high-alert medicine at home as well as in the hospital. National surveillance estimated nearly 100,000 emergency visits a year for insulin-related hypoglycemia and insulin errors, almost a third leading to admission (Geller et al., 2014).

The evidence for structured inpatient diabetes education is not new. In one academic center, patients who received it were readmitted within 30 days less often than those who did not, 11 versus 16 percent, a difference that held after adjustment (Healy et al., 2013). Our unit believes it already teaches. What we do not do is check, by watching, that the patient can use the pen.

Our checklist measures whether we talked, not whether the patient learned.

A DNP-prepared nurse would treat this as a systems problem rather than a staff-effort problem: define what complete teaching means, measure it, build it into the discharge workflow and test whether readmissions fall. That is the role the AACN essentials describe, and it is the work I hope to lead. The first step is modest: for one month, I will ask nurses to record whether each patient injected a dose in front of them, so we know the true starting point before anything changes. If the 18 percent holds, the gap is real; if it is higher than the charts suggest, the problem may be documentation rather than practice.

Reply to Keisha

Keisha, your fall data are strong. Have you looked at whether falls cluster on night shift? That would shape which part of the practice you change first.

Reply to Ben

Ben, I like your sepsis bundle gap. How will you separate patients who never met criteria from those who met them and were missed?

3

References

Geller, A. I., Shehab, N., Lovegrove, M. C., Kegler, S. R., Weidenbach, K. N., Ryan, G. J., & Budnitz, D. S. (2014). National estimates of insulin-related hypoglycemia and errors leading to emergency department visits and hospitalizations. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(5), 678-686. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.136

Healy, S. J., Black, D., Harris, C., Lorenz, A., & Dungan, K. M. (2013). Inpatient diabetes education is associated with less frequent hospital readmission among patients with poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care, 36(10), 2960-2967. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0108

Reading the NU 702 Unit 1 instructions

NU702's opening board usually asks each student to name a gap between evidence and practice in their own setting and to explain what a DNP-prepared nurse would do about it. Prompts often mention the DNP role, the AACN essentials or the readings on DNP impact. The strongest posts are specific: a named unit, a population, one or two local numbers and a published finding that shows a better practice exists. Instructors look for the role expressed through actions, such as leading a team, defining a measure or redesigning a workflow, rather than a general description of doctoral preparation. Replies to two classmates are expected and score best when they ask how a classmate will measure their gap. Opening posts generally run 300 to 450 words, with APA citations for every published claim and a brief reference list.

How this NU702 Unit 1 example is built

The post opens with the writer's two units and the two percentages that frame the problem, then reports the 214 patients and the 31 returns. A paragraph places the local problem in national context with Geller and colleagues' surveillance estimate. Healy and colleagues' cohort supports the value of structured inpatient education, and a highlighted line names the real issue: the checklist measures whether staff talked, not whether patients learned. The DNP role appears as four actions, define, measure, build into workflow and test, linked to the AACN essentials. A final paragraph proposes a modest first step, a month of recording whether each patient injected in front of a nurse, and explains what each possible result would mean. Two replies follow, one asking whether falls cluster by shift and one asking how missed sepsis cases will be separated from patients who never met criteria.

Reading the NU702 Unit 1 grading rubric

For this first DNP board, graders weigh how concrete the gap is, how well the evidence supports a better practice, how clearly the DNP role is shown, whether each reply moves a classmate forward and the writing itself. Concreteness earns most: a named setting, a population and local figures outscore a topic. Evidence credit requires a published source that speaks to the gap itself, not a general article on evidence-based practice. The role criterion rewards posts that show what the DNP-prepared nurse would do differently, especially defining measures and leading change across disciplines. Replies earn marks when they sharpen a classmate's measurement or scope. Professional tone, a clear structure and correct APA citations complete the criteria. Many instructors also notice whether the student proposes a realistic first step, since that shows readiness for the project courses ahead.

NU702 Unit 1 help from the desk

The posts that score lowest describe the DNP degree in general terms and never name a gap. Another frequent weakness is a gap stated without data, such as "patient teaching is inadequate," which gives the reader nothing to measure. Some students choose problems far outside their influence, like national policy, which makes later project units hard. Others cite general articles on evidence-based practice instead of evidence about their own problem. A reply that only agrees leaves the classmate's idea where it was. A practical way to start is to look at one checklist or report from your unit and ask whether it measures what it claims to. If it does not, you may have found your gap. Share your setting and the board prompt, and a custom post can frame your own gap with local and published evidence.

Get an NU702 Unit 1 example written to your instructions

Send the Unit 1 prompt, the practice gap you have in mind and your rubric. A custom post frames the gap with data, explains what the DNP role adds and includes replies if your board needs them. It arrives within 24-48h, and the first is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

Request this unit free All NU702 units Finished samples

More NU702 papers and DNP samples

NU702 Unit 1 questions, answered

What makes a good practice gap for the NU702 Unit 1 post?

A gap you can see in your own setting, supported by evidence that a better practice exists, and measurable with data you can reach. Naming the unit, the patients and one number makes the post concrete.

Should the Unit 1 post describe the DNP role in general?

Briefly. The stronger posts show the role through the gap: what the DNP-prepared nurse would do that is not happening now, such as leading a team or measuring results.

How long should replies be?

A few sentences each. Asking a classmate how they would measure their gap adds more than agreement.

Where can I find a free NU702 Unit 1 sample paper?

The complete NU702 Unit 1 discussion board post is shown above, with two classmate replies. It frames a gap between documented and demonstrated insulin teaching on two composite medical-surgical units and explains what a DNP-prepared nurse would do about it.

Why does the NU702 Unit 1 post propose a month of counting before any change?

The 18 percent figure came from chart documentation, which may not match what nurses actually do. Counting observed demonstrations for a month gives a true baseline, so the project knows whether the gap lies in practice or in documentation.