| Course | NU677 PMHNP Diagnosis and Management Across the Lifespan III |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 7 |
| Paper type | Delirium and dementia differential |
| Length | About 1,120 words, 7 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MSN |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NU677 Unit 7
What Is New and What Was Already There: A Delirium and Dementia Differential Two Days After Hip Fracture Surgery in a 79-Year-Old Retired Piano Tuner
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NU677: PMHNP Diagnosis and Management Across the Lifespan III
Unit 7 Delirium and Dementia Differential
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The patient is composite; scores, times and details are bracketed.
The Presentation
Mr. [T.], [79], a retired piano tuner and widower who lives alone, fell at home and fractured his left hip. He had a hemiarthroplasty the next day under spinal anesthesia with sedation. On the evening of the second day after surgery, the nurse found him agitated and pulling at his IV line. By morning he was drowsy, dozing mid-sentence and waking confused. He called his daughter by her mother's name. He had not had a bowel movement since admission, his urine output was low, and he had received [four] doses of oxycodone and one dose of diphenhydramine for sleep.
His daughter reports a slower change over the past year: he repeats the same stories, has missed two bills, and stopped doing the crossword he had done every morning for decades. He still drives short distances, cooks simple meals and keeps his house tidy.
Two Questions, Two Timelines
The central clinical task is to separate an acute change, over hours to days, from a chronic change over months. Delirium comes on over hours or days, disturbs attention and awareness, swings in severity across the day and has a medical, drug or withdrawal cause. Dementia is a gradual decline in cognition over months to years with preserved attention until late. Older adults with dementia are at higher risk of delirium, and the two often coexist.
Is There Delirium Now?
The Confusion Assessment Method was used. Its algorithm requires an abrupt start with a fluctuating course and inattention, plus one of two further features, rambling or illogical thought, or drowsiness or hypervigilance, and in its original validation it showed high sensitivity and specificity against expert diagnosis (Inouye et al., 1990).
1. Acute onset and fluctuating course: yes. He was oriented and conversing on the day of surgery, according to nursing notes, and has swung between agitation at night and drowsiness in the morning.
2. Inattention: yes. He stopped after two months when asked to recite the months in reverse, and he lost the thread of the conversation several times.
3. Disorganized thinking: yes. His answers drifted to his workshop and to his late wife.
4. Altered level of consciousness: yes, drowsy.
Result: positive for delirium.
Likely causes, several at once: opioids, the anticholinergic diphenhydramine, constipation, possible dehydration and urinary retention, pain, sleep disruption, the unfamiliar environment, and the surgery itself. Tests ordered: sodium, calcium, glucose, blood count, urinalysis, a bladder scan and a medication review.
Was There Dementia Before?
Delirium makes it impossible to test his baseline cognition now; any score today would reflect the delirium. The history must come from someone who knows him. An informant questionnaire, the IQCODE, asks someone close to the patient to compare the person's current abilities with ten years earlier, and a review found it reliable and valid for detecting dementia, including in settings where the patient cannot be tested directly (Jorm, 2004). His daughter completed it; the score of [3.6] suggests a decline beyond normal aging.
The IQCODE tells us what the delirium hides: that a year of forgetting came before the surgery and will still be there when the delirium clears.
The pattern she describes, repeated stories, missed bills and loss of a lifelong habit over a year, with preserved basic self-care, is consistent with probable mild dementia or mild neurocognitive disorder. The diagnosis cannot be confirmed until the delirium resolves.
Management on Two Timelines
Now, for the delirium:
1. Stop diphenhydramine; use a non-drug sleep routine.
2. Change to scheduled acetaminophen with the lowest effective opioid dose, since untreated pain also causes delirium.
3. Treat constipation; check for urinary retention with a bladder scan.
4. Hydration, glasses and hearing aids on, daylight during the day and dark at night, family visits, early mobilization with physical therapy.
5. Avoid physical restraints and routine antipsychotics; reserve a low-dose antipsychotic only for severe agitation that endangers him.
This approach reflects evidence that proactive, multicomponent care reduces delirium after hip fracture; in a randomized trial, patients who received proactive geriatric consultation developed delirium about a third less often than those receiving usual care (Marcantonio et al., 2001).
Later, for the possible dementia:
1. Reassess cognition [six to eight] weeks after discharge, when the delirium has cleared, with a standard cognitive test.
2. Review his safety at home, bills and driving with his daughter.
3. Consider a memory clinic referral if the test confirms impairment.
Why Not Test Cognition Now
The team was tempted to run a cognitive screening test on day two to settle the question of dementia. That would have produced a low score, but a score taken during delirium measures the delirium, not his underlying cognition, and could have labeled him with dementia on the basis of a temporary state. The informant questionnaire avoids this because it asks about change over years, reported by someone who knows him, and does not depend on his performance today. The formal test will wait until the delirium has cleared, when a low score will mean something.
Watching the Delirium Resolve
Recovery was tracked with the same screening method each morning and evening. On day three, after diphenhydramine was stopped, his bowels opened and his pain was controlled with scheduled acetaminophen, the evening agitation stopped, but morning drowsiness persisted. By day five he was attentive in the mornings, could recite the months backward with one error, and recognized his daughter by name. By discharge on day seven the screen was negative, though his daughter noticed he was slower than before the fall. That remaining slowness, and whether it resolves over the following weeks, will inform the later assessment.
What the Family Was Told
His daughter was told that the confusion since surgery is delirium, which is common after hip fracture, usually improves over days to weeks, and is being treated by removing its causes. She was also told that the forgetfulness she noticed over the past year is a separate matter, which will be assessed once he is recovered, and that his recovery from delirium may be slower because of it. She was asked to visit often and bring familiar objects from his workshop.
Why the Distinction Matters
Treating the whole picture as dementia would miss the reversible causes of delirium; treating it all as delirium would miss the year of decline. Separating the two lets each be managed on its own timeline.
References
Inouye, S. K., van Dyck, C. H., Alessi, C. A., Balkin, S., Siegal, A. P., & Horwitz, R. I. (1990). Clarifying confusion: The confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Annals of Internal Medicine, 113(12), 941-948. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941
Jorm, A. F. (2004). The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): A review. International Psychogeriatrics, 16(3), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610204000390
Marcantonio, E. R., Flacker, J. M., Wright, R. J., & Resnick, N. M. (2001). Reducing delirium after hip fracture: A randomized trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49(5), 516-522. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49108.x
Reading the NU 677 Unit 7 instructions
Unit 7 asks you to separate delirium from dementia in an older adult whose presentation includes both acute and chronic change. The assignment usually expects the history of each timeline, a validated delirium screen, a way to judge baseline cognition, likely causes of delirium, management of each condition, and communication with the family. Expect four to six pages. The rubric looks for correct use of instruments, especially the point that cognitive testing during delirium does not measure baseline, and for management that removes delirium's causes rather than sedating the patient. A clear explanation for the family, who often notice the chronic change first, rounds out a strong paper and prepares them for what comes next.
How the NU 677 Unit 7 example is put together
The presentation section describes the post-operative change and his daughter's account of the past year. A section frames the two timelines. The Confusion Assessment Method is applied item by item with his findings, and the likely causes and tests are listed. The IQCODE is used to judge his baseline through his daughter, with a highlighted sentence on what it reveals. A section explains why cognitive testing is deferred, and another tracks the delirium resolving by day seven. Management is split into now and later, with the Marcantonio trial. The family explanation and a closing paragraph on why the distinction matters complete the paper.
Reading the NU677 Unit 7 grading rubric
Differentials of this kind are usually graded on the separation of timelines, correct use of screening tools, identification of delirium causes, management and communication. Separation earns full points when acute and chronic changes are each supported by specific history. Tool use rewards a validated delirium screen applied correctly and an informant measure used for baseline. Cause identification is judged on a list that includes drugs, bowel and bladder, pain and environment. Management credit goes to non-drug, multicomponent care and a plan to reassess cognition after recovery. Communication points go to an explanation that helps the family understand two conditions on two timelines without alarming them unnecessarily.
NU677 Unit 7 help: mistakes that cost points
A frequent error is testing cognition during delirium and diagnosing dementia from the result. Another is attributing all confusion after surgery to dementia and missing reversible causes such as anticholinergic drugs, constipation or urinary retention. Students often treat agitation with antipsychotics before addressing causes. Some papers ignore the family's report of earlier decline, which is the key to the second timeline. Others forget pain, which causes delirium when it is undertreated. And a plan that never schedules the later cognitive assessment leaves the question of dementia unanswered after discharge, when nobody in the hospital will be there to ask it. Another gap is failing to plan the later cognitive test with a date, which means the question of dementia may never be answered once he leaves the hospital.
Get an NU677 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
Delirium and dementia cases in NU677 Unit 7 turn on dates, so include every timing detail your case gives, admission, surgery and family accounts, plus the rubric. A free first differential arrives within 24-48h, sorting what is new from what was already present and chasing each reversible cause in order. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More NU677 papers and MSN samples
- NU677 Unit 1: Hallucinations Across the Lifespan Post
- NU677 Unit 2: Selective Mutism Assessment Write-Up
- NU677 Unit 3: Consent and Assent, Divided Parents
- NU677 Unit 4: Lithium in Pregnancy Risk-Benefit
- NU677 Unit 5: Advance Directive Reflection
- NU677 Unit 6: Deprescribing Review After a Night Fall
- NU677 Unit 8: Capacity Assessment
- NU677 Unit 9: Legal Duty Brief
- NU677 Unit 10: Lifespan Case Synthesis
- NU676 Unit 7: Journal Club, EMERGENT-2 Appraisal
- MN501 Unit 7: Competency Self-appraisal
- NU675 Unit 7: Pediatric Risperidone Metabolic Brief
- MN502 Unit 7: Borrowed Theory Critique
NU677 Unit 7 questions, answered
Can delirium and dementia be present at the same time?
Yes, and often. Dementia raises the risk of delirium, and delirium may reveal a decline nobody had named. A strong paper records the acute change as delirium, notes probable prior impairment from informant history and defers formal cognitive diagnosis until the delirium has resolved, because testing during acute confusion measures the delirium rather than the baseline.
Which delirium screen should the paper use?
One validated for the setting, named with its cutoff. Widely used choices include the Confusion Assessment Method, in several versions, and the 4AT, which is brief and needs no special training. Report the items that were positive, since inattention and fluctuation carry the diagnosis, and say how often the screen will be repeated during the admission.
Where can I find a free NU677 Unit 7 sample paper?
The complete NU677 Unit 7 delirium and dementia differential is available here, with both timelines, the delirium screen, the informant measure, the resolution of the delirium, management now and later and the family explanation, plus three references. A differential for your own case can be drafted.
Why not test cognition during delirium in NU677 Unit 7?
A score taken during delirium measures the delirium rather than baseline cognition and could wrongly label a temporary state as dementia. The paper uses an informant questionnaire now and schedules formal testing six to eight weeks after discharge.
What reduces delirium after hip fracture in NU677 Unit 7?
Multicomponent care that removes causes and supports orientation: stopping anticholinergic sleep aids, treating pain and constipation, glasses and hearing aids, daylight, family visits and early mobility. In a randomized trial, proactive geriatric consultation reduced delirium by about a third.