| Course | NU656 AGACNP Critical Care Management |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 8 |
| Paper type | Acute kidney injury case study |
| Length | About 1,150 words, 7 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MSN |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NU656 Unit 8
The Kidneys Were Being Squeezed: An Acute Kidney Injury Case of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome on Day Two of Severe Acute Pancreatitis in a 58-Year-Old Man
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NU656: AGACNP Critical Care Management
Unit 8 Acute Kidney Injury Case
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The patient is composite; values, volumes and times are bracketed.
The Case
Mr. [D.] is a [58]-year-old man admitted [40] hours ago with severe acute pancreatitis after heavy alcohol use. He weighs [74] kg. His baseline creatinine, measured at a clinic visit [three] months ago, was [1.0] mg/dL. In the first [24] hours he received [nine] liters of crystalloid for tachycardia and a falling blood pressure. He is now intubated for worsening oxygenation and sedated.
The values that prompted this case appear below, baseline or admission first and current second.
1. Creatinine: [1.0] at baseline and [2.3] mg/dL now.
2. Urine output: [260] mL over the last [14] hours, an average of [0.25] mL/kg per hour.
3. Potassium: [4.2] and [5.4] mEq/L.
4. Bicarbonate: [23] and [18] mEq/L.
5. Mean arterial pressure: [72] mmHg on norepinephrine [0.10] mcg/kg per minute.
6. Peak airway pressure: [24] rising to [36] cm H2O over [eight] hours, with an unchanged tidal volume.
7. Abdomen: distended and tense; bladder pressure [24] mmHg, measured at end-expiration in the supine position.
Staging the Injury
KDIGO defines acute kidney injury by a rise in serum creatinine or a fall in urine output and grades it by whichever criterion gives the higher stage (Khwaja, 2012). Both criteria are worked here.
Creatinine: 2.3 / 1.0 = [2.3] times baseline. A rise to 2.0 to 2.9 times baseline is stage 2.
Urine output: an hourly rate under half a milliliter per kilogram sustained for at least 12 hours is stage 2; a rate under 0.3 sustained for a full day, or anuria lasting 12 hours, is stage 3. His output of [0.25] mL/kg per hour has lasted [14] hours, which is stage 2 now and will be stage 3 if it continues for another [10] hours.
He therefore has stage 2 acute kidney injury, on a trajectory toward stage 3. The urine output line is the one to watch, because it will cross into stage 3 before the creatinine does.
Finding the Cause
The usual causes of kidney injury in a critically ill patient were considered in order. Hypovolemia was unlikely after nine liters, with a positive balance of more than [seven] liters and edema in the flanks. Sepsis was possible but not supported: he had no fever above [38.1] C and no source on imaging. Nephrotoxins were reviewed; he had received one dose of contrast on admission for a CT scan and no aminoglycosides or anti-inflammatory drugs. Contrast alone would not explain a tense abdomen and rising airway pressures.
The 2013 consensus of the abdominal compartment society defines intra-abdominal hypertension as a sustained pressure of 12 mmHg or more, graded I at 12 to 15, II at 16 to 20, III at 21 to 25 and IV above 25. Abdominal compartment syndrome is a sustained pressure above 20 mmHg with new organ dysfunction (Kirkpatrick et al., 2013). His bladder pressure of [24] is grade III, and the kidneys and lungs are both failing. The diagnosis is abdominal compartment syndrome.
The abdominal perfusion pressure, mean arterial pressure minus intra-abdominal pressure, explains the kidneys. 72 minus 24 = [48] mmHg, below the level of about 60 at which organ perfusion is usually considered adequate. Pressure on the renal veins and parenchyma also reduces filtration directly. Pancreatic inflammation, a swollen bowel and large-volume resuscitation all raised the pressure, and the fluid given to protect the kidneys has become one of the forces injuring them.
Management, Ordered by Effect
The guideline sets out medical steps first and surgical decompression when they fail (Kirkpatrick et al., 2013). The plan follows that order with a clock.
1. Stop adding fluid. Further boluses are withheld, and maintenance fluid is cut to the minimum needed for medications. The guideline suggests avoiding a sustained positive balance once initial resuscitation is complete.
2. Improve abdominal wall compliance. Sedation and analgesia are deepened, and the head of the bed is kept below [30] degrees while pressures are measured. A trial of neuromuscular blockade is started, since relaxing the abdominal muscles can lower the pressure quickly.
3. Empty the gut. A nasogastric tube on suction and a rectal tube are placed to reduce the volume inside the bowel.
4. Drain free fluid. Ultrasound shows a moderate amount of fluid around the pancreas and in the abdomen; interventional radiology is asked to place a percutaneous drain, which the guideline suggests when free fluid is present, since it can avoid an operation.
5. Recheck. Bladder pressure is measured every [four] hours. If it stays above 20 mmHg with worsening organ function after [six] hours of these measures, the surgical team will be asked about decompressive laparotomy.
At [six] hours after the drain was placed and [1.4] liters removed, the bladder pressure was [16] mmHg and the peak airway pressure had fallen to [28]. Urine output rose to [0.6] mL/kg per hour over the next [four] hours.
The measurement itself needs care if the numbers are to be trusted. The bladder is instilled with no more than [25] mL of sterile saline, the transducer is zeroed where the midaxillary line meets the iliac crest, and the reading is taken at the end of expiration with the patient flat and without active abdominal muscle contraction. The bedside nurses were shown the method on the first reading, and each value is charted with the position and the sedation level at the time, so that a change in the number reflects the abdomen and not the technique. A reading taken with the head of the bed raised can overstate the pressure by several millimeters of mercury and lead the team toward an operation the patient does not need.
When Renal Replacement Therapy Would Start
Dialysis is not started simply because the creatinine has doubled. In the STARRT-AKI trial, starting renal replacement therapy early in critically ill adults with severe kidney injury did not reduce 90-day mortality and was associated with more patients remaining dependent on dialysis at 90 days than a standard strategy of waiting for a clear indication (STARRT-AKI Investigators, 2020). For this patient the triggers are stated in advance: potassium above [6.0] mEq/L despite treatment, pH below [7.15], fluid overload that impairs oxygenation after the abdomen has been decompressed, or oliguria persisting beyond [72] hours. If he needs it, continuous therapy will be chosen because his pressure depends on norepinephrine, and it will also allow fluid to be removed slowly.
The case teaches a single point that applies beyond pancreatitis: when a patient's kidneys fail after large-volume resuscitation and the abdomen is tense, the bladder pressure should be measured before any more fluid is given.
References
Khwaja, A. (2012). KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clinical Practice, 120(4), c179-c184. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339789
Kirkpatrick, A. W., Roberts, D. J., De Waele, J., Jaeschke, R., Malbrain, M. L. N. G., De Keulenaer, B., Duchesne, J., Bjorck, M., Leppaniemi, A., Ejike, J. C., Sugrue, M., Cheatham, M., Ivatury, R., Ball, C. G., Reintam Blaser, A., Regli, A., Balogh, Z. J., D'Amours, S., Debergh, D., . . . Olvera, C. (2013). Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: Updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Medicine, 39(7), 1190-1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-2906-z
STARRT-AKI Investigators. (2020). Timing of initiation of renal-replacement therapy in acute kidney injury. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(3), 240-251. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2000741
NU656 Unit 8 instructions, in plain terms
The Unit 8 case study asks you to work up acute kidney injury in a critically ill patient: stage it, determine the cause, manage it and state when renal replacement therapy would begin. Prompts usually expect the KDIGO staging worked from the numbers, a differential that considers volume, sepsis, toxins and obstruction, a management plan tied to the cause, and dialysis indications supported by current trials. Four to six pages in APA 7 is typical. The strongest papers show that the cause changes the management, so a generic kidney injury plan earns less than one built around this patient. Graders also look for the dialysis decision written as thresholds, set before the patient reaches them rather than decided on the night.
How this NU656 Unit 8 example is built
Seven numbered values open the case, from creatinine and urine output to peak airway pressure and a bladder pressure of 24. The staging section works both KDIGO criteria with arithmetic and notes which one will reach stage 3 first. The cause section rules out hypovolemia, sepsis and contrast in turn, then applies the WSACS grades and definition, and calculates the abdominal perfusion pressure to link the abdomen to the kidneys. Management follows the guideline's order in five numbered steps with a six-hour clock, and the result after the drain is reported in numbers. A paragraph on measuring bladder pressure correctly follows. The last section cites STARRT-AKI and states four triggers for continuous renal replacement therapy.
Reading the NU656 Unit 8 grading rubric
Grading for a kidney injury case in this course generally covers staging, diagnostic reasoning, management, renal replacement decisions and scholarly writing. Staging earns full points when both criteria are calculated and the higher stage is applied. Diagnostic reasoning is judged on a differential worked through in order, with each cause excluded by evidence from the case. Management scores well when each step follows from the cause and has a time to reassess. The renal replacement row expects current trial evidence and stated thresholds rather than a vague plan to consult nephrology. Writing points depend on clear headings, accurate citations and numbers a grader can recompute, which is why every calculation here is written out in full.
Common NU656 Unit 8 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Students often stage from creatinine alone and miss a worse urine output, or the reverse. A second frequent error is giving more fluid to an oliguric patient after large resuscitation without measuring bladder pressure, which can make the kidneys worse. Some papers name contrast as the cause because it was given, without asking whether it explains the whole picture. Others measure bladder pressure with the head of the bed raised or too much saline instilled, which overstates it. Starting dialysis because the creatinine doubled is common too, though STARRT-AKI found no benefit to early starts. And a plan that jumps to laparotomy skips the medical steps the guideline puts first.
Get an NU656 Unit 8 example written to your instructions
Baseline labs, today's labs and urine output, plus the rubric your NU656 Unit 8 section uses, are enough to begin. The case comes back within 24-48h at no cost for a first request, with both KDIGO criteria calculated, the cause defined by published criteria and dialysis triggers written as numbers a night team could act on. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More NU656 papers and MSN samples
- NU656 Unit 1: Variceal Bleed Priorities Post
- NU656 Unit 2: Shock Classification, Massive PE
- NU656 Unit 3: Hemodynamic Data After Colectomy
- NU656 Unit 4: Septic Shock From an Empyema
- NU656 Unit 5: High-Flow Oxygen Seminar Reflection
- NU656 Unit 6: Ventilator Plan for Moderate ARDS
- NU656 Unit 7: Blood Gas, Ethylene Glycol Poisoning
- NU656 Unit 9: Systems-based ICU Plan
- NU656 Unit 10: Goals of Care Summary
- NU655 Unit 8: Transfer Summary After TEN
- NU654 Unit 8: Serious Illness Summary, ALS
- NU653 Unit 8: Medicine Consult, Postoperative Anemia
- NU652 Unit 8: Asthma Escalation Plan
NU656 Unit 8 questions, answered
Which KDIGO criterion wins when creatinine and urine output disagree?
The one giving the higher stage. KDIGO stages acute kidney injury by creatinine or by urine output, and the patient is assigned the more severe of the two. The sample shows both calculations, reports stage 2 from creatinine and notes how many more hours of low urine output would change the urine criterion. Many papers compute only one and understate the stage.
Where can I find a free NU656 Unit 8 sample paper?
The complete NU656 Unit 8 acute kidney injury case study is on this page, including the staging arithmetic, the cause, five management steps, the bladder pressure method, dialysis triggers and three references. A case written to your own patient and prompt can be requested.
What is abdominal perfusion pressure in the NU656 Unit 8 case?
It is the mean arterial pressure minus the intra-abdominal pressure. With a mean pressure of 72 and a bladder pressure of 24, the value is 48 mmHg, below the level of about 60 usually considered adequate for organ perfusion.
How is abdominal compartment syndrome defined in NU656 Unit 8?
The 2013 WSACS consensus defines it as a sustained intra-abdominal pressure above 20 mmHg with new organ dysfunction. The patient's pressure of 24 is grade III intra-abdominal hypertension, and his kidneys and lungs are both failing.
Is the NU656 Unit 8 patient a real case?
No. He is a composite, and each value, volume and time is bracketed on the page. The case shows how kidney injury after large-volume resuscitation can come from the abdomen itself, and the same staging and workup apply to whichever patient your prompt describes.