Prognosis in the surgeon's sentences, three options with their consequences and a choice for comfort make up this NU655 summary for a frail man with a perforated colon. Searches like "nu 655 unit 6 assignment example", "nu655 unit 6 sample" and "nu655 unit 6 example" land here.
What a finished NU655 Unit 6 family meeting summary looks like
Two pages under five plain headings: what the family believed, what the surgeon said, the choices, the decision, and next steps. One line above them names the older daughter as health care agent. The first section notes that both daughters arrived believing their father had a stomach virus. The second reproduces prognosis in [three] sentences as spoken, including that he might not survive the operation and would probably not return to his memory care apartment; a bracketed ACS NSQIP risk estimate follows for clinicians. Choices appear as a short table: emergency surgery with a colostomy, antibiotics alone, or comfort-focused care, each with a line on what the coming days would look like. The fourth records the choice and the reason, quoted: he had told them he wanted no more hospitals.
How a NU655 Unit 6 example is structured
The summary is written for someone who was not at the table, so it records what was said rather than what was meant. The family's starting belief comes before prognosis because the distance between the two explains the meeting: the daughters expected a minor illness and heard, within minutes, that their father might die this week whatever they chose. Prognosis stays in the surgeon's words, and the chart's vocabulary appears only in brackets afterward. Each option carries its likely course, so the table cannot be read as three equal paths: antibiotics alone are described as unlikely to control a free perforation, which keeps a false middle choice off the page. The decision section separates what was chosen from why, and records that the daughters were asked what their father would want. Next steps give names by role and a time for the next call.
Where the daughters started
A stomach virus is what both daughters understood on arrival. Recording that first shows how far the conversation had to travel, and it explains why the meeting took [forty] minutes.
The surgeon's sentences, kept
Prognosis is written as spoken: he could survive the operation, a real chance existed that he would not, and life afterward would likely mean a nursing facility. The calculator estimate follows those sentences rather than replacing them.
No false middle path
Each option carries its likely days in plain terms. Antibiotics alone are described honestly as unlikely to control a free perforation, so the family is not offered a choice that exists only on paper.
A choice and its reason
Comfort-focused care is the decision. The daughters' reason is quoted, that he had said he wanted no more hospitals, and the summary notes that the question put to them was their father's likely choice, not their own preference.
Next steps with owners
The plan lists [morphine] and [haloperidol] at bracketed doses for pain and nausea, a hospice referral that evening, the surgical consult closed, and the nurse who will call the daughters by [09:00].
Where marks go in NU655 Unit 6
Prognosis recorded in chart vocabulary, rather than in the words spoken at the table, is the fault graders see most in these summaries. A line reading poor surgical candidate tells a later reader nothing about what the daughters were told. Omitting the family's starting understanding is another loss, since the summary then cannot show whether the explanation landed. Every option needs its consequences spelled out; one that exists only on paper, such as antibiotics presented as a comparable path, draws criticism. The decision has to be tied to the patient's values, not only to the family's preference. A plan with named follow-up and a time for the next contact is rewarded. Missing roles, an unclear decision-maker and identifying details about the family each take a little away.
Get a NU655 Unit 6 example written to your instructions
The meeting you attended, and the family in it, stay yours; a sample can only show the shape of one, using a composite family and a different patient. Outline the situation, who took part and the decision, all de-identified, then send the rubric. The first summary is free, ready in 24-48h, with prognosis kept in the words spoken at the table.
NU655 Unit 6 questions, answered
Should the summary use the surgeon's exact words?
As closely as the notes allow. What makes the summary useful is a record of what the family actually heard, so prognosis is recorded in the plain sentences used, with clinical terms or calculator estimates added in brackets afterward. Rubrics often mark down summaries that translate the conversation into terms nobody used with the family.
Who makes the decision if the patient has dementia?
Usually a surrogate: an agent the patient appointed while able, or a relative recognized under state law. The summary names who holds that authority in one line and notes that the daughters were asked what their father would choose. It also records statements he made before his dementia progressed, since those carry weight.
Can the summary describe a meeting I attended?
Your own summary should reflect the meeting you took part in, with names and identifying details removed. The sample is a composite and cannot stand in for that record. What your preceptor observed, and anything signed on your clinical days, remains your own, as do the hours and logs behind it.