| Course | NU654 AGACNP Acute Care Diagnosis and Management III |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 7 |
| Paper type | Rapid response debrief |
| Length | About 1,090 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MSN |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for NU654 Unit 7
Thirty-Eight Minutes at 02:14, and the Creatinine Before Them: A Rapid Response Debrief of Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression Two Days After Spinal Fusion
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NU654: AGACNP Acute Care Diagnosis and Management III
Unit 7 Rapid Response Debrief
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The patient and all staff are composite and identified by role; times, doses and values are bracketed.
Timeline
1. [02:14], night nurse. Found Mrs. [L.] difficult to rouse; respiratory rate [6], saturation [82] percent on [2] liters, pupils pinpoint. Called rapid response.
2. [02:16], night nurse and charge nurse. Bag-mask ventilation with oxygen; saturation rising to [94] percent.
3. [02:18], rapid response team arrives: critical care nurse, respiratory therapist, AGACNP.
4. [02:19], AGACNP. Naloxone [0.04 mg] intravenously.
5. [02:21], AGACNP. Naloxone [0.04 mg] repeated; patient opening eyes to voice.
6. [02:23], respiratory therapist. Respiratory rate [12]; bag-mask stopped; nasal oxygen.
7. [02:25], critical care nurse. Point-of-care glucose [118] mg/dL.
8. [02:35], respiratory therapist. Arterial gas: pH [7.28], pCO2 [58] mmHg, pO2 [88] mmHg on [4] liters.
9. [02:40], AGACNP. Naloxone infusion started at [0.1 mg] per hour, because the respiratory rate began to fall again to [8] at [02:38]; scheduled morphine discontinued.
10. [02:52], team. Transfer to step-down with continuous capnography.
Recognition: The Event Began Before [02:14]
The rapid response was called at [02:14], but the conditions for it were present hours earlier.
Mrs. [L.] had received morphine [4 mg] intravenously every [four] hours on a schedule since surgery, plus as-needed doses for pain. On the morning of [Day 2], her creatinine was [2.1] mg/dL, up from [0.9] before surgery, after a period of low blood pressure in the operating room. The result was reviewed and fluids were increased, but the morphine order was not changed. Morphine is broken down to metabolites, including morphine-6-glucuronide, that are cleared by the kidneys and accumulate when kidney function falls; the active metabolite adds to sedation and respiratory depression (Dean, 2004). When the creatinine doubled, every scheduled dose of morphine became a larger dose, even though the order did not change.
At [22:00], the evening nurse recorded a Pasero Opioid-Induced Sedation Scale score of 3: frequently drowsy, arousable, drifting off to sleep during conversation. On that scale, a score of 3 is unacceptable and calls for holding or reducing the opioid and increasing monitoring (Pasero, 2009). The as-needed morphine was held, but the scheduled [midnight] dose was given, because the order was scheduled rather than as needed. Respiratory rate at [22:00] was [12], and saturation was [95] percent on [2] liters, which may have been reassuring.
Response: What Went Well
The response itself was fast and effective. The nurse recognized opioid toxicity, supported breathing with a bag-mask before the team arrived and called early. The team gave naloxone in small, repeated doses, which reversed the respiratory depression without causing sudden, severe pain or agitation in a patient two days after spine surgery. They checked glucose to exclude another cause, measured the carbon dioxide, recognized that the naloxone's effect was wearing off before the morphine's, and started an infusion. Transfer with continuous capnography was the right level of monitoring.
Why Small Doses of Naloxone
The choice of [0.04 mg] rather than a full [0.4 mg] dose deserves a comment, because it is the decision most often questioned after an event like this. A full dose would have reversed the respiratory depression more quickly, but it would also have reversed her analgesia completely, two days after spine surgery. Sudden, severe pain after abrupt reversal can cause agitation, a surge in blood pressure and heart rate and, in some patients, pulmonary edema. Because she was being ventilated with a bag-mask and her saturation had recovered, there was time to titrate. Small repeated doses restored her breathing within four minutes while leaving her some pain control. The infusion followed because naloxone wears off in less than an hour, and the morphine metabolites accumulated in her body would outlast it for many hours with her kidney function.
How the Debrief Was Held
The debrief took place at [03:30] at the nurses' station, lasted [15] minutes and brought together everyone who had been at the bedside, along with the covering clinician. It followed a simple order: what happened, what went well, what could be improved, and what each person would take away. The facilitator, the critical care nurse, began by thanking the night nurse for calling early and ventilating before help arrived, which set a tone in which the evening nurse, who had given the midnight dose, could describe her reasoning openly. That openness is what allowed the scheduled order, rather than any individual, to be identified as the problem.
Contributing Factors
1. Drug and kidney: a scheduled opioid with renally cleared active metabolites continued after a doubling of creatinine.
2. Order design: the order set allowed scheduled intravenous morphine without a built-in review when kidney function changed.
3. Monitoring: pulse oximetry on supplemental oxygen can remain normal while carbon dioxide rises, which delays detection; capnography was not in use on the surgical ward.
4. Escalation: a sedation score of 3 led to holding as-needed doses but did not prompt a call to review the scheduled order.
5. Patient factors: age [79], low body weight and a first surgery requiring opioids.
The pain management nursing society's monitoring guideline identifies advanced age, renal impairment and the first 24 to 48 hours after surgery as periods of higher risk, and recommends sedation assessment alongside respiratory monitoring, with capnography considered for high-risk patients (Jarzyna et al., 2011). Mrs. [L.] met all three.
Recommendations
1. Pharmacy: automatic review of scheduled opioid orders when creatinine rises by 50 percent or more.
2. Prescribers: avoid scheduled morphine in older adults with changing kidney function; prefer agents without active renally cleared metabolites, at reduced doses, and as-needed rather than scheduled when possible.
3. Nursing: a sedation score of 3 triggers a call to the prescriber to review all opioid orders, scheduled and as needed.
4. Monitoring: continuous capnography for postoperative patients on intravenous opioids who meet two or more risk criteria.
5. Education: a brief review at the surgical ward's next huddle, using this case with identifiers removed.
Outcome
Mrs. [L.] stayed on step-down for [24] hours. The naloxone infusion was stopped at [10:00] the next morning. Her pain was managed with scheduled acetaminophen, a reduced dose of hydromorphone as needed, and physical therapy. Her creatinine returned to [1.2] by [Day 5]. She and her family were told what happened, and a safety report was filed the same morning by the night nurse.
References
Dean, M. (2004). Opioids in renal failure and dialysis patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 28(5), 497-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.02.021
Jarzyna, D., Jungquist, C. R., Pasero, C., Willens, J. S., Nisbet, A., Oakes, L., Dempsey, S. J., Santangelo, D., & Polomano, R. C. (2011). American Society for Pain Management Nursing guidelines on monitoring for opioid-induced sedation and respiratory depression. Pain Management Nursing, 12(3), 118-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2011.06.008
Pasero, C. (2009). Assessment of sedation during opioid administration for pain management. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 24(3), 186-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2009.03.005
Reading the NU 654 Unit 7 instructions
The Unit 7 assignment asks you to write a debrief of a rapid response or code in which you took part or which you observed. You set out a timeline, then analyze recognition before the call, the response itself and the contributing factors, and make recommendations. Staff are identified by role. Most prompts set about five pages. The debrief should separate what happened from what it means, credit what went well and look for causes in the hours before the event as well as in the event itself. Sources should support the clinical points, such as how opioids behave in kidney injury. Record times to the minute, since the analysis refers back to them. Credit what the responders did well.
How this NU654 Unit 7 example is built
The example's timeline lists time, role and action for each entry, so the analysis can refer to them by time. The recognition section traces the event back to a doubled creatinine and a sedation score, with evidence on morphine metabolites and on the sedation scale, and a highlighted sentence on how the same order became a larger dose. A section explains the choice of small naloxone doses and the infusion. Another describes how the debrief was held and why its tone mattered. Contributing factors cite the monitoring guideline, recommendations are matched to them, and the outcome closes the document. The timeline and the analysis never mix.
NU654 Unit 7 rubric: what earns full points
The Unit 7 rubric weighs the timeline, the analysis of recognition, the evaluation of the response, the contributing factors, the recommendations and professionalism. A timeline scores best when every entry is exact and free of judgment. Recognition analysis is weighted heavily, because most rapid responses begin before the call. The response should be evaluated fairly, crediting what went well. Contributing factors count when they include system design as well as individual actions. Recommendations score well when some remove the need to remember, such as automatic pharmacy review. Professional tone and role-based identification are expected throughout. Describing how the debrief itself was held can also earn credit for professionalism.
NU654 Unit 7 help: mistakes that cost points
The most common mistake is starting the analysis at the moment of the call, which misses the hours when the event could have been prevented. Another is focusing on the nurse who gave the last dose rather than the order that required it. Students often recommend education alone. The reason for small naloxone doses is frequently left unexplained. Some debriefs do not mention what went well. And timelines that mix interpretation into the entries make it hard to see what actually happened and when. Explain the reason for the naloxone dose you chose, since graders often ask. And include the patient's outcome and whether she was told.
Get an NU654 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
Hypotension, a new arrhythmia, bleeding, a seizure or sudden confusion could be the event behind your prompt. Whatever it is, the debrief keeps its timeline free of judgment, examines recognition before the call and assigns every action by role. Send the event, any timeline supplied and the rubric; a first one is free, returned in 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More NU654 papers and MSN samples
- NU654 Unit 1: Stroke and Pulmonary Edema BP Post
- NU654 Unit 2: Deterioration Case, Guillain-Barre
- NU654 Unit 3: Competing Priorities, Aortic Stenosis
- NU654 Unit 4: Sepsis Management Paper, Dialysis
- NU654 Unit 5: Seminar Reflection, Adrenal Crisis
- NU654 Unit 6: Integrated Plan, Endocarditis
- NU654 Unit 8: Serious Illness Conversation Summary
- NU654 Unit 9: Overnight Contingency Plan
- NU654 Unit 10: Multi-system Case Study
- NU653 Unit 7: Case Conference Review, Near Miss
- NU652 Unit 7: Imaging Brief for Suspected PE
- NU651 Unit 7: Clinical Question Brief on IV Fluids
- NU650 Unit 7: Chest Pain Workup, Myopericarditis
NU654 Unit 7 questions, answered
Why does the debrief start before the rapid response call?
Because the deterioration began earlier. The sedation score at 22:00 and the rising creatinine were both documented before the patient stopped breathing adequately. A debrief that starts at the call can review only the response; starting earlier lets it examine why the warning signs did not lead to a change in the order.
Are staff named in the debrief?
No. Everyone is identified by role, such as night nurse, covering clinician or pharmacist. The event is a composite, and debriefs of this kind focus on systems and processes rather than individuals. Where a prompt names a specific format, such as a structured team debrief tool, the sample follows it with the same restraint.
Could the sample reconstruct a different kind of call?
Yes. Calls for hypotension, new atrial fibrillation, hypoglycemia or acute respiratory distress follow the same structure, with the clinical sections changed. Share what your prompt supplies and the level of detail expected, and the debrief builds its timeline and analysis around that event, keeping recognition before the call as its first subject.
Where can I find a free NU654 Unit 7 sample paper?
This page contains the complete NU654 Unit 7 rapid response debrief, with the timeline, the recognition analysis, contributing factors and recommendations. For a debrief of a different emergency, a free document can be written from your notes.
Why was morphine a problem in the NU654 Unit 7 patient?
Morphine is broken down to metabolites that the kidneys clear, including one that adds to sedation and breathing depression. When her creatinine doubled after surgery, those metabolites built up, so each scheduled dose acted like a larger one.