NU648 Unit 8 Beers Criteria Prescribing Review Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Specialized Pharmacology for the AGACNP Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NU648 Unit 8 sample is an older adult prescribing review for an 88-year-old woman admitted with a urinary tract infection after a fall at home. It was written for Purdue Global NU 648, Specialized Pharmacology for the AGACNP, part of the MSN acute care nurse practitioner program. Eleven active orders are held against the 2023 AGS Beers Criteria, and six are flagged: promethazine, meclizine, cyclobenzaprine, nitrofurantoin with a clearance of 26 mL/min, sliding-scale insulin alone and rivaroxaban. Each flag ends in an action. Three drugs stop, two are replaced and rivaroxaban becomes apixaban at the reduced dose. The five orders not flagged get one line each, and the changes are paced over two days.

CourseNU648 Specialized Pharmacology for the AGACNP
UnitUnit 8
Paper typeOlder adult prescribing review
LengthAbout 980 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NU648 Unit 8

1

Six Flags in Eleven Orders: An Older Adult Prescribing Review Against the 2023 Beers Criteria for an 88-Year-Old Admitted After a Fall

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU648: Specialized Pharmacology for the AGACNP

Unit 8 Older Adult Prescribing Review

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The patient is composite; doses, weights and laboratory values are bracketed, and changes are proposed to the admitting team rather than made by the reviewer alone.

What this part is doingThe review opens with the three numbers that decide most of the flags: age, weight and kidney function.
2

The Patient

Mrs. [P.] is an [88]-year-old woman, widowed and living by herself, who was found on her kitchen floor by a neighbor. She had been there for about [three] hours. On arrival she was confused, with urinary frequency, a temperature of [38.1] degrees Celsius and a urinalysis consistent with infection; the urine culture later grew Escherichia coli. She weighs [52] kg. Her creatinine is [1.2] mg/dL, and her creatinine clearance is about [26] mL/min by Cockcroft-Gault using actual body weight. She has atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes managed with diet alone at home, hypothyroidism and chronic low back pain.

Her eleven active orders after the first hospital night are promethazine for nausea, meclizine for dizziness, cyclobenzaprine for back spasm, nitrofurantoin for the infection, insulin lispro by sliding scale alone, rivaroxaban for atrial fibrillation, metoprolol tartrate, levothyroxine, acetaminophen as needed, polyethylene glycol and a vitamin D supplement.

The AGS Beers Criteria list medications that are potentially inappropriate for adults aged 65 and older, with tables for drugs to avoid in general, drugs to avoid with certain conditions, drugs to use with caution, interactions and doses to adjust for kidney function (American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel, 2023). The panel describes the list as a guide for judgment, not a set of prohibitions, and the review uses it that way.

The Six Flagged Orders

Promethazine. Flag: first-generation antihistamine, strongly anticholinergic, on the list of drugs to avoid. For a confused woman who has just fallen, confusion and sedation are the harms that matter most. Action: stop. Nausea began with the fever and has settled with fluids; if it returns, the team will look for a cause before choosing an antiemetic.

Meclizine. Flag: the same antihistamine class and the same anticholinergic burden. Dizziness is a symptom, not a diagnosis, and hers is most likely from dehydration and infection, since her orthostatic blood pressures dropped by [24] mm Hg on standing. Action: stop, and treat the cause with fluids and a repeat orthostatic check.

Cyclobenzaprine. Flag: skeletal muscle relaxant, poorly tolerated by older adults because of anticholinergic effects and sedation, with questionable effectiveness at doses they can tolerate. Action: stop. Back pain is covered by scheduled acetaminophen and heat.

Three of the six flags are the same problem in different bottles: drugs that make an old brain slower and less steady, given to a woman who is confused and has just fallen.

Nitrofurantoin. Flag: the kidney function table advises against it once clearance falls under 30 mL/min, because drug levels in the urine are too low to work while systemic toxicity rises. Nitrofurantoin is a first-line agent for uncomplicated cystitis in women (Gupta et al., 2011), but her clearance of [26] mL/min places it outside that role. Action: replace with cephalexin at a dose adjusted for her clearance, guided by the culture result, which shows susceptibility.

What this part is doingEach flagged row states the Beers rationale in one sentence, so a reader can check the criterion without opening the tables.
3

Sliding-scale insulin alone. Flag: insulin given only as short-acting correction doses without basal insulin is on the list to avoid, because it raises the risk of low glucose without improving control. The American Diabetes Association also advises against sliding-scale insulin as the only regimen in the hospital (American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2025). Her glucose readings have run [110] to [168] mg/dL on diet alone. Action: stop the sliding scale, check glucose before meals, and start basal insulin only if readings stay above [180] mg/dL.

Rivaroxaban. Flag: the 2023 update advises avoiding rivaroxaban for long-term treatment of atrial fibrillation in favor of safer anticoagulant alternatives, because of higher bleeding rates in older adults. Stopping anticoagulation would be worse than the flag: at her age, with atrial fibrillation and hypertension, her stroke risk is high. Action: resolve the flag within the class by switching to apixaban at [2.5 mg] twice daily, the lower dose its labeling sets for a patient who is 80 or older and weighs 60 kg or less, starting when the next rivaroxaban dose would have been due.

What this part is doingOne flag is resolved within the drug class, because stopping anticoagulation would create a larger risk than the one the flag describes.
4

The Five Orders Not Flagged

1. Metoprolol tartrate: continue; rate control for atrial fibrillation, heart rate [72].

2. Levothyroxine: continue; last TSH within range.

3. Acetaminophen: change from as needed to scheduled [650 mg] every [six] hours for her back, maximum [3 g] a day.

4. Polyethylene glycol: continue; she has had no bowel movement for [two] days.

5. Vitamin D: continue; no interaction or kidney concern at her dose.

Pacing the Changes

Six changes at once in a confused older adult would make it impossible to tell which one helped or harmed. The review sequences them:

1. Day 1, morning: stop promethazine and meclizine; begin scheduled acetaminophen.

2. Day 1, afternoon: replace nitrofurantoin with cephalexin, since the infection cannot wait.

3. Day 2, morning: stop cyclobenzaprine; stop the sliding scale and move to glucose checks before meals.

4. Day 2, evening: switch rivaroxaban to apixaban at the time the next dose falls due.

The anticholinergic drugs come off first because they are the likeliest contributors to her confusion. Confusion, falls risk, glucose and bleeding signs will be reviewed at each step.

Summary

Of eleven orders, six were flagged and five were not. Three flagged drugs stop, two are replaced and one is resolved by changing to a safer drug in the same class. Each change is linked to a Beers table and to her own numbers, and the review will be sent to her primary care provider so that the stops made in the hospital are not reversed by an old prescription at home.

5

References

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. (2025). 16. Diabetes care in the hospital: Standards of care in diabetes 2025. Diabetes Care, 48(Suppl. 1), S321-S334. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-S016

American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. (2023). American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 71(7), 2052-2081. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18372

Gupta, K., Hooton, T. M., Naber, K. G., Wullt, B., Colgan, R., Miller, L. G., Moran, G. J., Nicolle, L. E., Raz, R., Schaeffer, A. J., & Soper, D. E. (2011). International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 52(5), e103-e120. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq257

NU648 Unit 8 instructions, in plain terms

The Unit 8 assignment asks you to review the medications of a hospitalized older adult against the AGS Beers Criteria and recommend changes. You calculate kidney function, screen every active order, cite the Beers table behind each flag, and give an action for each: stop, replace, adjust or keep with a documented reason. Orders that are not flagged should still be listed, so the grader can see the whole screen. Many sections ask you to sequence the changes safely. Expect three to five pages, with the 2023 Beers update and any guideline that supports a specific replacement. The case includes kidney function on purpose, because several Beers flags depend on creatinine clearance rather than on the drug alone.

How this NU648 Unit 8 example is built

The example opens with age, weight and a Cockcroft-Gault clearance because those three numbers decide most flags. It lists the eleven orders in one sentence, then introduces the Beers tables and the panel's own caution that the criteria guide judgment. Each flagged drug gets a short entry with the flag, the reason in plain terms and the action. One highlighted sentence groups three flags as the same anticholinergic problem. The rivaroxaban entry shows a flag resolved within the drug class, because stopping anticoagulation would carry more risk than the flag. A numbered schedule spaces the changes across two days. A closing summary counts the outcomes and sends the review to the primary care provider.

Where the points sit in the NU648 Unit 8 rubric

The Unit 8 rubric awards points for screening accuracy, the rationale for each flag, the quality of the recommendations and the safety of the plan. Screening accuracy depends on applying the right table, such as the kidney function table for nitrofurantoin. Rationale earns full credit when each flag is explained in terms of this patient's risk, here confusion and falls. Recommendations are judged on whether each flag has an action and an alternative where one is needed. Safety rewards pacing the changes and monitoring for effects. Clear organization counts too, and a review that lists the unflagged orders shows the screen was complete. Correct Beers table names in each flag make that check quick.

Common NU648 Unit 8 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Students often flag drugs correctly and then stop, leaving the action to the reader. Another error is stopping an anticoagulant because of a Beers flag, when the better answer is a safer drug in the same class. Kidney function is sometimes calculated with the wrong weight or left out, and the nitrofurantoin flag is missed. Some reviews change every flagged drug on the first day, which makes it impossible to tell what helped. Many forget to send the changes to the primary care provider, so old prescriptions return at discharge. And avoid treating the criteria as absolute rules, since the AGS itself does not.

Get an NU648 Unit 8 example written to your instructions

Your NU648 Unit 8 review needs the full order list, the patient's age, weight, kidney function and reason for admission, along with the course's grading criteria. Costing nothing on a first order and usually back in 24-48h, the review sample screens against the current Beers edition and gives every flagged drug a specific, sequenced action. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More NU648 papers and MSN samples

NU648 Unit 8 questions, answered

Should the review also use STOPP/START?

It can, and some sections ask for both. STOPP/START, most recently revised in 2023, adds criteria for omissions, drugs that should be started, which the Beers Criteria do not cover. The sample uses whichever tools the prompt names and notes where the two agree or differ for this patient.

What if a flagged drug is clearly working for the patient?

Then the review can keep it with the reason documented. The Beers Criteria are meant to prompt a closer look, not to forbid a drug outright, and a benefit that outweighs the risk for a specific patient is a legitimate conclusion. The sample would state that benefit, the monitoring it demands, and a date to reassess.

Does the sample recommend changes for real older patients?

No. The case is invented, written to show how a prescribing review is reasoned and laid out for a course. Any medication change for an actual person depends on the prescriber, the pharmacist, the patient's own goals and a full clinical picture. For that reason every figure stays a bracketed placeholder.

Where can I find a free NU648 Unit 8 sample paper?

The complete NU648 Unit 8 prescribing review is on this page, with eleven orders screened against the 2023 Beers Criteria, six flags and an action for each. If your patient has a different medication list, request a free sample written from your case.

Which Beers Criteria edition should NU648 Unit 8 use?

The sample uses the 2023 AGS Beers Criteria update, the current edition. It added the advice to avoid rivaroxaban for long-term atrial fibrillation treatment in favor of safer alternatives, which changes one of the sample's decisions.