NU610 Unit 7 screening plan example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN NP III Clinical - Primary Care Focus Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This page holds a full NU610 Unit 7 screening plan in true form. A composite 44-year-old woman born in [a country with high hepatitis B prevalence], whose sister was treated for ovarian cancer, has no symptoms. Her plan is a table in three bands, screens her age triggers, screens her history adds and one screen considered and not offered, each row naming the recommending body, year and grade, followed by a paragraph that sequences the actions.

What this page holds

Screens offered to a composite 44-year-old woman in NU610 Unit 7, each with its USPSTF grade and year, including two risk-based additions and one test declined on a D grade. Searches like "nu 610 unit 7 assignment example", "nu610 unit 7 sample" and "nu610 unit 7 example" land here.

1

A Screening Plan for One Asymptomatic 44-Year-Old Woman: What Age Triggers, What Risk Adds and What the Evidence Advises Against

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU610: NP III Clinical - Primary Care Focus

Unit 7 Screening Plan

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The patient is composite; her birthplace, history and dates are bracketed, and each row applies the cited recommendation to her in one line.

What this part is doingThe purpose line comes first. Every row is screening for a person without symptoms, never a workup.
2

Purpose: preventive screening for an asymptomatic adult.

Case Summary

Age [44]. BMI [29]. Born in [country], moved to the United States at [22]. [Never] smoked. Alcohol [one or two] drinks a week. Sister diagnosed with ovarian cancer at [51]; no other known family cancers; no known BRCA result in the family. Last cervical cytology [four years] ago, normal, cytology alone. No prior hepatitis B, hepatitis C or HIV test on record. No mammogram yet.

Band 1: Screens Her Age Triggers

Cervical cancer. USPSTF, 2018, grade A. Population: ages 30 to 65, with a Pap test at three-year intervals or a five-year interval when high-risk HPV testing is used, alone or with cytology (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2018a). Why she qualifies: [44], last cytology alone four years ago, so she is due. Action: high-risk HPV test today, which extends her next interval to five years if negative.

Breast cancer. USPSTF, 2024, grade B. Population: women 40 to 74, biennial mammography (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2024). Why she qualifies: [44], never screened. Action: order screening mammogram.

Prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. USPSTF, 2021, grade B. Population: people aged 35 through 70 whose BMI is in the overweight or obese range (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2021b). Why she qualifies: [44], BMI [29]. Action: A1C or fasting glucose with today's labs.

Hepatitis C. USPSTF, 2020, grade B. Population: adults 18 to 79, at least once (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2020b). Why she qualifies: [44], never tested. Action: hepatitis C antibody with reflex RNA.

HIV. USPSTF, 2019, grade A. Population: adolescents and adults 15 to 65 (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2019b). Why she qualifies: [44], never tested. Action: HIV antigen and antibody test, offered with opt-out.

What this part is doingRows within each band run by potential benefit. The reader meets the screens most likely to matter first.
3

Band 2: Screens Her History Adds

Hepatitis B. USPSTF, 2020, grade B. Population: adolescents and adults at increased risk, including those born in countries with a prevalence of 2 percent or higher (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2020a). Why she qualifies: born in [country], where prevalence exceeds that threshold. Action: hepatitis B surface antigen, with antibody to surface antigen and core antibody to show immunity or past infection.

BRCA-related cancer risk assessment. USPSTF, 2019, grade B. Population: women whose own history or relatives' history includes the cancers linked to BRCA genes, or whose ancestry carries a known founder mutation; a short familial risk tool sorts who should see a genetic counselor (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2019a). Why she qualifies: a sister with ovarian cancer. Action: complete the familial risk tool today; refer for genetic counseling if positive, which a first-degree relative with ovarian cancer usually makes it.

What this part is doingThe history band shows eligibility, not suspicion. Each row names the exact fact in her history that meets the population criteria.
4

Band 3: Considered and Not Offered

Ovarian cancer screening. USPSTF, 2018, grade D. Population: asymptomatic women without a known high-risk hereditary cancer syndrome (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2018b). Why it applies: she has no known BRCA mutation, and screening with ultrasound or CA-125 in this population has not reduced deaths and leads to surgery for false positives. Action: not offered. If genetic counseling finds a mutation, her risk and options change, and that is a separate conversation.

The not-offered band is as much a part of the plan as the screens, because it records what the evidence advises against as clearly as what it supports. Her sister's cancer makes it natural for her to ask for an ovarian test, and the plan gives a reason for not offering one.

Sequence of Actions

Today: HPV test during the pelvic examination; one blood draw for A1C, hepatitis B panel, hepatitis C antibody and HIV test; familial risk tool completed at the visit. This week: mammogram scheduled. Within [four] weeks: results reviewed; genetic counseling referral if the risk tool is positive; hepatitis B vaccination offered if she is not immune and not infected; a positive surface antigen would lead to further testing and household screening. Next year: colorectal cancer screening begins at 45 (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2021a); a reminder is set for her next birthday.

5

References

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2018a). Screening for cervical cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 320(7), 674-686. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.10897

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2018b). Screening for ovarian cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 319(6), 588-594. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.21926

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2019a). Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 322(7), 652-665. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.10987

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2019b). Screening for HIV infection: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 321(23), 2326-2336. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.6587

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2020a). Screening for hepatitis B virus infection in adolescents and adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 324(23), 2415-2422. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.22980

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2020b). Screening for hepatitis C virus infection in adolescents and adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 323(10), 970-975. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1123

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2021a). Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 325(19), 1965-1977. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6238

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2021b). Screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 326(8), 736-743. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.12531

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2024). Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 331(22), 1918-1930. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.5534

How this NU610 Unit 7 example is structured

A one-line statement of purpose heads the plan, screening for an asymptomatic adult, so no row is read as a workup for symptoms. Only data that change eligibility appear in the case summary. The table is ordered in three bands: screens her age alone triggers, screens her history adds, and screens considered and not offered. Within each band, rows run by potential benefit. Every row cites who issued the recommendation, when its current version appeared, and its letter grade, then applies the population criteria to her in one line. The not-offered band is the distinctive part of this plan, since it shows what the evidence advises against as clearly as what it supports. Beneath the table, a follow-up paragraph sequences the actions: labs drawn together, mammography scheduled, the familial risk tool completed today, and colorectal screening flagged for next year, when she turns 45.

Get an NU610 Unit 7 example written to your instructions

Paste the Unit 7 adult scenario and its rubric, and mention any table layout your NU610 section requires. You will receive a first screening plan free within 24-48h, every row carrying its recommending body, year, grade and population, the qualifying data from the case beside each, and the screens deliberately not offered kept in view. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

NU610 Unit 7 questions, answered

Should the plan include screens the Task Force grades C?

Yes, marked as individual decisions. A C grade means the service can be offered selectively based on professional judgment and patient preference. Record that it was discussed and what the patient chose. Leaving C-graded services out entirely, or ordering them by default, both miss the point of the grade and tend to cost credit.

What if two recommending bodies disagree?

Name both, give their positions and years, and say which position the plan adopts and why it fits her. Breast screening start ages and cervical intervals are common examples. Graders generally accept either choice when the reasoning is explicit, and mark down a plan that follows one body silently as though no disagreement existed.

Do immunizations belong in a screening plan?

Check your prompt. Some sections want screening only; others expect a combined prevention plan with the CDC adult immunization schedule as the vaccine source. If you include them, keep them in a separate part of the table so screening grades and vaccine recommendations are not confused, since they come from different bodies.