One composite teenager's well visit, documented for NU610 Unit 6, with each screen tied to age or risk, confidential time recorded, and three routine-sounding tests left out for stated reasons. Searches like "nu 610 unit 6 assignment example", "nu610 unit 6 sample" and "nu610 unit 6 example" land here.
Preventive Visit Write-Up: A 15-Year-Old's Well Visit Under Bright Futures, With Every Screen's Basis and Three Tests Left Out
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NU610: NP III Clinical - Primary Care Focus
Unit 6 Preventive Visit Write-Up
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The adolescent and family are composite; scores, measurements and quoted words are bracketed, and nothing here would identify a real patient.
Attendance and Consent
Present: the patient, [15], and [her mother] for the first and last parts of the visit. Confidential time alone with the teen: [twelve minutes], explained at the start as routine at this age, with its limits stated: what she shares stays private unless someone's safety is seriously threatened. Framework: Bright Futures guidance for health supervision in middle adolescence (Hagan et al., 2017).
Interval History
No illnesses, injuries or emergency visits since the last well visit. No medications. Menarche at [12]; periods regular. No allergies.
Psychosocial Interview
Summarized by HEADSSS domain (Goldenring & Rosen, 2004): Home: lives with [mother and younger brother]; "we argue about my phone but it's fine." Education: grades [steady], mostly Bs; wants to study [nursing]. Activities: [volleyball] three afternoons a week; two close friends. Drugs: no alcohol, vaping, cannabis or other drugs; says friends do not use either. Sexuality: not sexually active; has not had a partner; comfortable talking about it. Suicide and mood: PHQ-A score [6], in the mild range; no thoughts of self-harm; says she feels "stressed before tests." Safety: wears a seat belt; no weapons at home; feels safe at school and online. Sleep: [six hours] on school nights, in bed at [midnight] after scrolling on her phone; tired in first period.
Examination
Height [163 cm], [60th] percentile; weight [55 kg], [55th] percentile; BMI [20.7], [52nd] percentile for age and sex. Blood pressure [112/68], under the 90th percentile once age, sex and height are accounted for. Vision [20/20] both eyes. Exam normal, including skin, spine and thyroid; sexual maturity rating [4].
Immunizations
Reconciled against the current schedule (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2025): Complete: Tdap at [11]; HPV series of two doses, completed at [12]; meningococcal conjugate first dose at [11]. Due: meningococcal conjugate booster at [16]; scheduled for the next well visit. Offered today: seasonal influenza vaccine, accepted.
Screening Table
Depression: PHQ-A. Source: USPSTF, 2022, screening for adolescents aged 12 to 18 (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2022b). Basis: age. Result: score [6], mild; follow up on sleep and test stress; repeat at next visit. Anxiety: brief anxiety questions. Source: USPSTF, 2022, screening for children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2022a). Basis: age. Result: test-related worry without impairment; no referral. HIV: one-time screening offered. Source: USPSTF, 2019, screening beginning at 15 (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2019). Basis: age. Result: offered during confidential time; declined today, to be offered again at next visit. Blood pressure: measured against pediatric norms. Source: Bright Futures. Basis: age. Result: normal. Vision: Snellen chart. Source: Bright Futures. Basis: age. Result: normal. Dyslipidemia: deferred. Source: Bright Futures periodicity, a universal check in late childhood, ages 9 to 11, repeated in the 17 to 21 window. Basis: age window. Result: done at [10], normal; next due at 17. Every row states whether age or risk put the screen there, so a reader can tell a universal screen from one this teen earned.
Not Indicated Today
Lipid panel: she is between the universal screening windows and has no risk factors such as obesity or a family history of early heart disease. Hemoglobin: no risk factors for anemia, such as heavy periods, restrictive diet or chronic illness, so it was not drawn. Chlamydia and gonorrhea testing: she is not sexually active, so risk-based testing does not apply; she knows she can ask for it confidentially at any time.
Anticipatory Guidance
Sleep: phone out of the bedroom by [22:30], a set bedtime on school nights, and a two-week sleep log. Stress: a conversation about test preparation and who she can talk to at school. Safety: driving is coming; seat belts, no phone while driving, never riding with an impaired driver. Nutrition and activity: continue sport; calcium and iron sources discussed.
Plan
Next well visit at [16], with the meningococcal booster and HIV screening offered again. Follow-up phone call in [four weeks] on sleep, the concern the interview surfaced, with a PHQ-A repeat sooner if her mood worsens.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Child and adolescent immunization schedule by age: Recommendations for ages 18 years or younger, United States, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html
Goldenring, J. M., & Rosen, D. S. (2004). Getting into adolescent heads: An essential update. Contemporary Pediatrics, 21(1), 64-90.
Hagan, J. F., Shaw, J. S., & Duncan, P. M. (Eds.). (2017). Bright Futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents (4th ed.). American Academy of Pediatrics.
US Preventive Services Task Force. (2019). Screening for HIV infection: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 321(23), 2326-2336. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.6587
US Preventive Services Task Force. (2022a). Screening for anxiety in children and adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 328(14), 1438-1444. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.16936
US Preventive Services Task Force. (2022b). Screening for depression and suicide risk in children and adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 328(15), 1534-1542. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.16946
How this NU610 Unit 6 example is structured
The write-up follows the order of the visit. It opens with attendance and consent, because confidentiality shapes everything recorded after it. The interval history and psychosocial interview come next, the interview summarized by HEADSSS domain with the teen's own words quoted where they matter. The examination section is brief and recorded against age norms. Immunizations follow as a reconciliation listing what is complete, due and scheduled. The screening table is the core: every row carries the screen, the source and year, the basis as age or risk, and the result or action. A separate section, headed not indicated today, records three tests a reader might expect and the reason each was left out. Anticipatory guidance is summarized by topic. The write-up ends with the next well visit and one follow-up on sleep, the concern the interview surfaced.
Get an NU610 Unit 6 example written to your instructions
Share the Unit 6 scenario from your NU610 course, the age group it covers, and the rubric attached to it. At no cost for a first write-up, it returns within 24-48h following the preventive framework for that age, tying each screen to age or risk, recording confidential time where it applies, and giving a reason for every test left out. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
NU610 Unit 6 questions, answered
Which framework should a pediatric or adolescent preventive visit follow?
Bright Futures, from the American Academy of Pediatrics, is the usual reference for the structure and periodicity of well visits from infancy through adolescence, with USPSTF statements for specific screens. For adult patients, the Task Force recommendations and the CDC immunization schedule typically replace it. Name the edition or update year you used, since periodicity tables change.
How should confidential information appear in the write-up?
Record that confidential time occurred and summarize findings at the level the course expects, using composite details only. Real charts protect confidential adolescent information in specific ways, and a course write-up should show awareness of that without inventing sensitive disclosures. A line noting what the parent was and was not told is often enough.
Why list tests that were not done?
Because an unexplained gap looks the same as a missed step. A preventive write-up in a stewardship course earns credit for knowing which common tests the evidence does not support at this age. One line per item, with its source, shows that the visit was complete by design rather than by accident.