Prepared for NU610 Unit 10 and built to be spoken in minutes, an outline presenting one composite man's microhematuria workup by risk tier, with likely preceptor questions answered in advance. Searches like "nu 610 unit 10 assignment example", "nu610 unit 10 sample" and "nu610 unit 10 example" land here.
Oral Case Presentation Outline: Microscopic Hematuria in a 53-Year-Old Former Smoker, Built on the 2020 AUA/SUFU Risk Tiers
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NU610: NP III Clinical - Primary Care Focus
Unit 10 Oral Case Presentation Outline
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The patient is composite; counts and dates are bracketed, and the feedback box is left for the preceptor to complete.
One-Liner
[53]-year-old man, former smoker, with microscopic hematuria found at a [workplace screening]; the question is whether he needs a full urologic evaluation.
History of Present Illness
1. Dipstick positive for blood at [workplace screening] on [date]; no visible blood at any time.
2. No urinary symptoms: no dysuria, frequency, urgency, flank pain or stones.
3. No benign explanation: no vigorous exercise in the [48] hours before, no recent infection, no instrumentation or catheter, no trauma.
4. Risk history: [12] pack-years, quit [eight] years ago; no occupational exposure to dyes, rubber or leather chemicals; no pelvic radiation; no cyclophosphamide.
Pertinent Data
1. Urine microscopy on a properly collected midstream sample: [8] red blood cells per high-power field.
2. Serum creatinine normal; eGFR [88].
3. No proteinuria; no dysmorphic red cells or casts reported.
4. Blood pressure [128/80].
Microscopy confirms the dipstick, and the normal creatinine without protein or casts points away from a kidney cause and toward the urinary tract. The guideline requires microscopic confirmation, three or more red cells per high-power field, before an evaluation proceeds, since a dipstick alone can be positive for other reasons (Barocas et al., 2020).
Assessment
Microhematuria, confirmed, intermediate risk under the 2020 AUA/SUFU guideline. Factors that placed him there: a man aged 40 to 59; 10 to 30 pack-years of smoking. His red cell count, [8] per high-power field, would on its own have fit the low-risk tier, but the tier is set by the highest-risk factor present (Barocas et al., 2020).
Plan
1. Cystoscopy: to look for bladder cancer, the most common malignancy found in this evaluation, especially in people who have smoked.
2. Renal ultrasound: to image the kidneys for a mass, stones or obstruction.
3. Held: CT urography, which the guideline reserves for the high-risk tier. In the intermediate tier, ultrasound paired with cystoscopy provides the imaging, with less radiation and contrast.
4. Referral to urology for cystoscopy; ultrasound ordered today.
5. If both are negative: the guideline supports shared decision-making about repeat urinalysis, and a return of hematuria or new symptoms would prompt reevaluation.
Anticipated Questions
Why not CT urography? The intermediate tier's imaging is ultrasound; CT urography is recommended for high-risk patients, and he does not meet that tier. Why not just repeat the urinalysis? Repeat testing is an option only in the low-risk tier; his age and smoking history put him above it. Could this be benign? It could, and most cases are, but benign causes were excluded in the history, and his smoking history raises the chance of a bladder tumor. Risk models combining age, sex, smoking and red cell count can separate those with a meaningful risk of malignancy from those with very little (Loo et al., 2013). What would move him to high risk? Age 60 or over, more than 30 pack-years, more than 25 red cells per high-power field or any history of visible blood.
Preceptor Feedback
[Box left blank for the preceptor to complete.]
References
Barocas, D. A., Boorjian, S. A., Alvarez, R. D., Downs, T. M., Gross, C. P., Hamilton, B. D., Kobashi, K. C., Lipman, R. R., Lotan, Y., Ng, C. K., Nielsen, M. E., Peterson, A. C., Raman, J. D., Smith-Bindman, R., & Souter, L. H. (2020). Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU guideline. Journal of Urology, 204(4), 778-786. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
Loo, R. K., Lieberman, S. F., Slezak, J. M., Landa, H. M., Mariani, A. J., Nicolaisen, G., Aspera, A. M., & Jacobsen, S. J. (2013). Stratifying risk of urinary tract malignant tumors in patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 88(2), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.10.004
How this NU610 Unit 10 example is structured
The outline follows the order of a standard oral presentation, compressed for speech. The one-liner states age, sex, the finding and the question: does this man need a full urologic evaluation? The HPI bullets are chosen to exclude benign and medical-renal explanations first, so the listener hears why a urologic cause remains. Data bullets report the microscopy count, since the guideline requires microscopic confirmation before evaluation proceeds. The assessment bullet names the risk tier and each factor that placed him there. Plan bullets pair each test with its reason, and one bullet explains a test withheld. The anticipated-questions section is the distinctive feature: it lists what a preceptor is likely to press on, such as why not CT, and gives a one-sentence answer to each. The feedback box at the end is left for the preceptor to complete, and the spoken presentation itself remains the student's own.
Get an NU610 Unit 10 example written to your instructions
Send the Unit 10 case, the minutes you will have at the presentation, and the rubric your NU610 instructor applies. Free as a first sample and back within 24-48h, the outline is written as speakable bullets, organized around the clinical question, ties each test to its guideline tier, and lists the preceptor questions most likely to come, each with a short answer ready. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
NU610 Unit 10 questions, answered
How long should the outline be?
Long enough to support the time limit and no longer. For a five to seven minute presentation, one to two pages of bullets usually suffices. Every bullet should be something you will say. If your outline contains paragraphs you would need to read aloud, the presentation will sound read rather than presented.
What questions do preceptors usually ask about a workup?
Why this test and not another, what you would do with each result, what you ruled out and how, and whether any finding changes the urgency. Preparing a one-sentence answer to each for your own case is often more useful than rehearsing the presentation itself, because the questions test the reasoning behind it.
Can the outline include the preceptor's feedback?
Leave space for it but never fill it in yourself. Feedback, evaluations and signatures belong to the preceptor and to your clinical record. The outline is preparation for a spoken presentation you give, and a written sample covers only that preparation, organized so you can deliver it in your own words.