NU581 Unit 7 communication reflection example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN FNP II Clinical - Children and Adolescent Health Focus Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This page holds a full NU581 Unit 7 communication reflection in true form. Every question the writer put to a composite eleven-year-old with four months of stomachaches was answered by his mother, sometimes before he had looked up from his shoes. The reflection follows the visit through Borton's three questions: the three attempts to hear from the boy directly, what finally worked, and what the writer will do differently.

What this page holds

Three attempts to hear an eleven-year-old over his mother's answers, analyzed with the research on triadic pediatric visits, form NU581's Unit 7 communication reflection on a composite encounter. Searches like "nu 581 unit 7 assignment example", "nu581 unit 7 sample" and "nu581 unit 7 example" land here.

1

Every Answer Came From His Mother: A Communication Reflection on Three Attempts to Hear an Eleven-Year-Old

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU581: FNP II Clinical - Children and Adolescent Health Focus

Unit 7 Communication Reflection

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The child and family are composites; no real person is described.

What this part is doingThe title states the problem in six words. Borton's questions keep the description short and the analysis long.
2

What?

Borton's framework moves from describing an event to making sense of it to deciding what to change (Borton, 1970). What happened was brief. [Ethan], 11, came with his mother for four months of stomachaches. She sat between us. I asked him, "Can you tell me about your stomachaches?" She answered: "They're terrible. He's missed six days of school." I turned my chair and my body toward him and asked again, "Where does it hurt?" He shrugged. She said, "All over, he says." For my third attempt, I asked her first to tell me the whole history, the timing, the missed days, what she had tried, and listened fully. Then I gave him a body outline and a pencil and said, "Can you show me where it hurts, and draw how big it is?" He drew a circle around his belly button. I asked, "When does it come?" He said, quietly, "School mornings. Not weekends."

So What?

Why did the first two attempts fail, and why did the third work? I considered three explanations.

His mother's worry. She had carried this for four months, missed work, and been told at an urgent care visit that it was "probably nothing." She arrived wanting to be heard. Until she had been, she answered every question because she was afraid the story would be lost.

His embarrassment. At eleven, stomachaches on school mornings may feel like something to hide, especially with his mother listening. Drawing gave him a way to answer without speaking first.

My own discomfort. I noticed that I wanted his mother to stop answering, and I felt, briefly, irritated with her, which was unfair: she was doing what worried parents do. My irritation may have shown in the second attempt, when I turned my body away from her. That probably made her answer faster.

A review of doctor-parent-child communication found that children contribute little to pediatric consultations, often because parents and clinicians talk past them (Tates & Meeuwesen, 2001). A later review found that children want to be involved and are more able to participate than adults often assume, when given the means (Coyne, 2008). The third attempt worked because it gave each of them what they needed in order: the mother a full hearing, the boy a way in that did not require him to speak first.

His answer mattered clinically. Pain around the belly button on school mornings, not on weekends, with normal growth, is a pattern that fits functional abdominal pain (Hyams et al., 2016), and it pointed toward a question I had not yet asked: what happens at school.

What this part is doingThe analysis tests three explanations and includes the writer's own reaction. His answer is shown to matter clinically, not only as good communication.
3

Now What?

Three changes. First, I will begin school-age visits by saying the order out loud: "[Name] goes first today, then you, so I hear it both ways." Second, when a parent is clearly worried, I will let the parent tell the story fully first, then turn to the child, because a parent who has been heard is more willing to listen. Third, I will keep body outlines and paper in my bag, since some children answer with a pencil before they answer with words.

I also plan to ask for a few minutes alone with children around this age when the history suggests something they may not say in front of a parent, framing it as routine for every child his age.

What this part is doingThe changes are concrete and ordered. Each one answers a specific failure in the three attempts.
4

What I Still Wonder

I am not sure the third attempt would have worked without the drawing. Some children would have drawn nothing and shrugged again. I wonder too whether I should have asked his mother to step out earlier, before the drawing, and whether that would have felt to her like being dismissed after four hard months. My preceptor's view was that the order I used, parent first and then child, earned the mother's trust for the later request to speak with him alone, and that asking her to leave at the start might have ended the visit badly. I think she is right for this family, but I suspect the order will need to change with the child. A thirteen-year-old might need the time alone first, and a seven-year-old might never need it at all.

What Happened Next

My preceptor, with his mother's agreement, spoke with [Ethan] alone for five minutes. He said a group of boys had been teasing him at lunch since the start of the school year. The plan changed: a school counselor referral, a conversation with his mother about the teasing, and a follow-up visit in [three] weeks to see whether the stomachaches ease.

5

References

Borton, T. (1970). Reach, touch, and teach: Student concerns and process education. McGraw-Hill.

Coyne, I. (2008). Children's participation in consultations and decision-making at health service level: A review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(11), 1682-1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.05.002

Hyams, J. S., Di Lorenzo, C., Saps, M., Shulman, R. J., Staiano, A., & van Tilburg, M. (2016). Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: Child/adolescent. Gastroenterology, 150(6), 1456-1468. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.015

Tates, K., & Meeuwesen, L. (2001). Doctor-parent-child communication: A (re)view of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 52(6), 839-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00193-3

How this NU581 Unit 7 example is structured

Description is limited to a few sentences so the reflection's weight falls on interpretation. The analysis resists the easy reading, that the mother was controlling, and tests three explanations: her anxiety after four months without an answer, a family habit of speaking for a quiet child, and the writer's own questions, which were closed and adult-shaped. The literature on triadic visits supports the observation that children's participation in consultations tends to be small and that clinicians often address parents by default. The turning point is analyzed closely: giving the mother a defined role first, then offering the boy a nonverbal way in, respected both. The school-morning detail is treated carefully, as a clue the clinician explored further rather than a conclusion. Two observable changes end the piece, and the medical workup gets a single sentence, since the assignment concerns communication.

Get an NU581 Unit 7 example written to your instructions

Communication reflections vary: a parent answering for a child, a teenager silent with a parent present, or a family disagreeing about care. Describe what the Unit 7 prompt asks and which model your section requires, plus its criteria. The composite reflection will analyze a comparable encounter, while reflecting on your own visits stays your task. The first comes without charge inside 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

NU581 Unit 7 questions, answered

Which reflective model should I use?

Whichever your course names; Gibbs, Rolfe, Johns and Borton are all common. If none is required, choose one and name it in the introduction, because graders check that the structure is followed. The sample uses Borton's three questions, which suit a short reflection with a single turning point, and labels each section accordingly.

Is it acceptable to criticize the parent?

Describe what happened, then analyze it, which is different from criticizing. Consider why the parent behaved as they did and what your own part was. Reflections that blame a parent tend to read as defensive, while those examining the whole interaction, including the clinician's habits, score better and are more useful for practice.

How much should the reflection say about the child's diagnosis?

Very little, unless the prompt asks. A communication reflection is about the interaction, so the clinical workup needs a sentence at most. The sample mentions that recurrent abdominal pain was being evaluated and that the school-morning pattern was explored further, then keeps its attention on who spoke, who was heard and why.