NU572 Unit 6 preventive care plan example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN AGNP I - Primary Care of the Adolescent and Adult Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This page holds a full NU572 Unit 6 preventive care plan in true form. By the age table a composite 32-year-old man is too young for colorectal screening, and his father's colon cancer at 42 makes him due this year anyway. Two groups organize the plan built for him, services triggered by age and services triggered by risk, with each recommendation cited alongside the year it was issued and a status and action for each.

What this page holds

Age-triggered and risk-triggered services sit in separate columns for a thirty-two-year-old composite patient, each USPSTF, ACIP or specialty recommendation dated and its trigger named, in NU572 Unit 6. Searches like "nu 572 unit 6 assignment example", "nu572 unit 6 sample" and "nu572 unit 6 example" land here.

1

Too Young by the Age Table, Due by His Father's Age: A Preventive Care Plan Sorted by What Triggered Each Service

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU572: AGNP I - Primary Care of the Adolescent and Adult

Unit 6 Preventive Care Plan

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The patient is a composite; values and statuses in brackets are illustrative.

What this part is doingThe title sets age against risk, the two triggers the plan sorts by. The trigger column makes the reasoning for each row checkable.
2

Profile

Mr. [J.], 32, a physical therapist assistant. Sexually active with men; [two] partners in the past six months; condoms inconsistently. BMI [31]. Father with type 2 diabetes and colon cancer diagnosed at 42. AUDIT-C [5]. No tobacco. Blood pressure [124/78]. Last preventive visit [four] years ago.

Age-Triggered Services

1. Blood pressure screening. Source: USPSTF, 2021. Trigger: age 18 or older. Status: [124/78] today. Action: recheck every [three to five] years, or yearly given BMI.

2. Hepatitis C, one-time screening. Source: USPSTF, 2020 (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2020). Trigger: age 18 to 79. Status: never tested. Action: antibody test today.

3. HIV, one-time screening. Source: USPSTF, 2019 (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2019). Trigger: age 15 to 65. Status: last tested [two] years ago. Action: see risk rows, since repeat testing applies.

4. Unhealthy alcohol use. Source: USPSTF, 2018. Trigger: adults 18 or older. Status: AUDIT-C 5, positive for men at 4 or more. Action: brief counseling today; full AUDIT.

5. Depression. Source: USPSTF, 2023. Trigger: all adults. Status: PHQ-2 [negative]. Action: rescreen yearly.

Risk-Triggered Services

1. Colonoscopy. Source: US Multi-Society Task Force, 2017. Trigger: a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer before 60. Status: never done. Action: colonoscopy now, every five years. The USPSTF statement covers average-risk adults only, so his family history sends the decision to a different body. The 2021 USPSTF recommendation to begin at 45 addresses average risk (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2021a). For a first-degree relative diagnosed before 60, the US Multi-Society Task Force advises a first colonoscopy at 40 or at the relative's diagnosis age minus ten, choosing the younger, repeated every five years (Rex et al., 2017). Ten years before 42 is 32.

2. Diabetes and prediabetes. Source: USPSTF, 2021. Trigger: overweight or obesity at 35 to 70; earlier with risk factors such as family history. Status: never tested. Action: A1C today, given BMI 31 and his father's diabetes, though he is below 35 (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2021b).

3. HIV, repeated testing. Source: USPSTF, 2019; CDC, 2021. Trigger: men who have sex with men with new or multiple partners. Status: due. Action: test today and every [three to six] months while risk continues.

4. HIV preexposure prophylaxis. Source: USPSTF, 2023. Trigger: increased risk of HIV acquisition. Status: not taking. Action: offer PrEP; he may start after a negative HIV test and kidney function check (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2023).

5. Syphilis. Source: USPSTF, 2022; CDC, 2021. Trigger: men who have sex with men. Status: never tested. Action: test today and every [three to six] months while risk continues.

6. Chlamydia and gonorrhea. Source: USPSTF, 2021, insufficient evidence for men; CDC, 2021. Trigger: sexually active men who have sex with men. Status: never tested. Action: urine, pharyngeal and rectal testing yearly at least, or every three to six months with ongoing risk, following CDC guidelines (Workowski et al., 2021).

7. Hepatitis B. Source: USPSTF, 2020; CDC. Trigger: men who have sex with men. Status: vaccination history unknown. Action: test for surface antigen and antibodies; vaccinate if not immune.

What this part is doingThe risk rows show where the Task Force is silent or insufficient and name the body that fills the gap. Colonoscopy and chlamydia testing are the clearest cases.
3

Immunizations

Per the current CDC adult schedule (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2025):

1. Influenza: yearly; due today.

2. COVID-19: per the current recommendation.

3. Tdap or Td: last dose [unknown]; give Tdap today, then Td or Tdap every 10 years.

4. Hepatitis B: per row 7 above.

5. Hepatitis A: recommended for men who have sex with men; give if not immune.

6. HPV: routine through age 26; at 32, shared decision making, with more benefit for men with new partners.

7. Meningococcal and mpox: per current recommendations for his risk.

What this part is doingImmunizations sit in their own block because their triggers mix age and risk. Hepatitis A and HPV follow his risk, while influenza and Tdap follow the calendar.
4

Services Deliberately Not Offered

1. Lung cancer screening: not indicated; never smoked, and age below 50.

2. Prostate cancer screening: not indicated at 32; begins as a discussion at 55, earlier for high risk.

3. Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: men 65 to 75 who have smoked.

4. Statin for primary prevention: USPSTF applies at 40 to 75; lipid panel at clinician discretion given his BMI and family history.

How the Plan Was Negotiated

Nineteen items is too many for one visit, and the plan was not delivered as a list. He was asked which mattered most to him, and he chose PrEP and the colonoscopy, the second because watching his father's illness had frightened him. Those two, with the blood tests that could share one draw, happened today. The alcohol conversation was brief and framed around his own goal of losing weight, since alcohol calories were part of that. Vaccines were given in one sitting, three at a time. The remaining items were scheduled rather than dropped, and each has a date in the follow-up line. Sorting by trigger also helped him understand why a 32-year-old needed a colonoscopy his friends did not: the reason is his father, not his age.

Follow-Up

Results call in [one] week. PrEP visit in [two] weeks if he chooses it. Colonoscopy referral placed today. Preventive visit yearly.

5

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Adult immunization schedule by age: Recommendations for ages 19 years or older, United States, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-age.html

Rex, D. K., Boland, C. R., Dominitz, J. A., Giardiello, F. M., Johnson, D. A., Kaltenbach, T., Levin, T. R., Lieberman, D., & Robertson, D. J. (2017). Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 112(7), 1016-1030. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.174

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2019). Screening for HIV infection: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 321(23), 2326-2336. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.6587

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2020). Screening for hepatitis C virus infection in adolescents and adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 323(10), 970-975. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1123

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2021a). Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 325(19), 1965-1977. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6238

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2021b). Screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 326(8), 736-743. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.12531

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2023). Preexposure prophylaxis to prevent acquisition of HIV: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 330(8), 736-745. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.14461

Workowski, K. A., Bachmann, L. H., Chan, P. A., Johnston, C. M., Muzny, C. A., Park, I., Reno, H., Zenilman, J. M., & Bolan, G. A. (2021). Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, 70(4), 1-187. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1

How this NU572 Unit 6 example is structured

The trigger column is the organizing idea. Each row states whether age alone qualified him or a named risk did, which makes the plan's reasoning checkable at a glance. Where the USPSTF is silent or insufficient, the row says so and names the body that fills the gap. Colonoscopy is the clearest case: the 2021 USPSTF statement addresses average risk only, so the row turns to the US Multi-Society Task Force, whose 2017 advice starts colonoscopy at forty or ten years before the youngest affected relative was diagnosed, whichever is earlier. Chlamydia and gonorrhea testing is another, graded insufficient for men by the Task Force in 2021 and advised at least yearly for sexually active men who have sex with men in the CDC's 2021 treatment guidelines. Immunizations cite the current ACIP adult schedule, and HPV at thirty-two is marked as shared decision making.

Get an NU572 Unit 6 example written to your instructions

Preventive plans are built around the patient your case describes, with every recommendation checked against the version current on the day the sample is written. Add any required columns, grading letters or citation style the rubric sets. The first plan costs nothing and returns in 24-48h, shaped by your instructions. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

NU572 Unit 6 questions, answered

What if the USPSTF has no recommendation for a service?

Say so, then name the body that does address it. An I statement means the evidence is insufficient, not that the service is harmful, and specialty societies or the CDC often fill the gap. Citing both sources, with years, shows the plan understands the difference between a Task Force grade and the absence of any guidance.

How many risk factors should the plan address?

Every one the case describes. Case writers include a family history, a sexual history or a body mass index because each should change the plan, and graders usually check them one by one. A factor that alters nothing deserves a sentence explaining why, so the omission looks deliberate rather than careless.

Should immunizations be part of a preventive care plan?

In most sections, yes, because adult vaccines are preventive care and the ACIP schedule is updated every year. Listing each vaccine with its basis, whether age, exposure or shared decision making, and a status of due, current or declined keeps that block as checkable as the screening rows above it.