Four over-the-counter products missing from the chart, an anticholinergic burden score of [9] and two prescribing cascades organize NU569 Unit 8's review of one composite older woman's ten medications. Searches like "nu 569 unit 8 assignment example", "nu569 unit 8 sample" and "nu569 unit 8 example" land here.
What a finished NU569 Unit 8 geriatric medication review looks like
A table of all ten products anchors roughly four pages. Its columns are the product and bracketed dose, the stated reason she takes it, who started it, the 2023 AGS Beers Criteria flag where one applies, the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden score, and a proposed action for the prescriber. Six rows carry a flag or a score. The nighttime [acetaminophen] product contains [diphenhydramine]; [oxybutynin] for urgency and [meclizine] for dizziness add to it, for a burden total of [9]. [Ibuprofen] from the pharmacy aisle sits beside [lisinopril] and [hydrochlorothiazide], a pairing tied to acute kidney injury. [Omeprazole] has run [six] years without a documented reason, and daily [aspirin] was self-started for prevention. Beneath the table, a one-page cascade map and a three-visit plan complete the review.
How a NU569 Unit 8 example is structured
The review moves from source to finding to plan. It opens with how the list was assembled, the bag, the pharmacy fill history and her own account, and records the four products the chart lacked. After the table, each flagged row gets a short paragraph explaining the risk in this patient rather than in older adults generally: her [two] near-falls, a creatinine clearance of [44] mL/min by Cockcroft-Gault, and a daughter's report of foggy mornings. The cascade map is the analytic center. It draws the diuretic leading to urgency and then to [oxybutynin], and the sedating sleep product leading to morning dizziness and then to [meclizine]. The plan sequences changes across [three] visits so that only one or two shift at a time, begins with the over-the-counter products she can stop most safely, and names what will be watched after each change.
The list the chart did not have
A brown-bag review, the pharmacy fill history and her account are compared line by line. Four products surface that no prescriber had recorded, and the review explains why over-the-counter use is easy to miss in a short visit.
Burden added up
Each product receives its Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden score, and the total is stated with the harms a score that high is associated with. Three drugs from three different sources produce the sum, which is the point.
Two cascades drawn
Arrows connect each drug to the symptom it caused and the drug then prescribed for that symptom. Seen together, the two chains explain half the list, and the review treats them as one problem.
Risk stated for her
Every flag is tied to something in this patient: kidney function, near-falls, morning confusion. A flag that repeats the criteria without applying them would tell a prescriber nothing new.
Three visits, one change at a time
The sleep product and [ibuprofen] go first, with [acetaminophen] scheduled for her knees. Diuretic timing and [oxybutynin] follow at the second visit, and the [omeprazole] taper and [aspirin] conversation at the third.
Where marks go in NU569 Unit 8
Completeness comes before judgment in most NU569 medication review rubrics, and a review built from the chart alone, missing over-the-counter products, starts with a serious gap. Graders expect each flag drawn from a named, current source, with the 2023 Beers update cited by year; an outdated edition or an unnamed list of risky drugs loses credit. Flags must also be applied to the patient, since the criteria themselves warn they are not absolute rules. Recommending that five drugs stop at once is marked down as unsafe sequencing. Missing a cascade when the case offers one costs analysis credit. Changes written as orders instead of proposals for the prescriber, and no monitoring after each change, draw the remaining deductions.
Get a NU569 Unit 8 example written to your instructions
Paste the medication list from your Unit 8 case, including anything bought without a prescription, along with the prompt and rubric. We sort it against the current Beers Criteria, add up the anticholinergic load, and sequence changes in a plan written for the prescriber, with every dose bracketed. Your first sample is free and arrives in 24-48h.
NU569 Unit 8 questions, answered
Which edition of the Beers Criteria should a review cite?
The current one, which is the 2023 update from the American Geriatrics Society, cited with its year. Earlier editions differ on several drugs, including [aspirin] for prevention, so an old citation can produce a wrong flag. Many sections also accept STOPP/START alongside it. Name whichever tool you use in the first paragraph so the grader knows the standard.
Do supplements belong in a geriatric medication review?
Yes. Supplements interact, add cost and sometimes duplicate prescribed drugs, and patients often leave them off a list unless asked directly. A review that records them, notes any interaction with the prescribed regimen, and states whether each has a reason to continue is more complete. The sample gives over-the-counter products and supplements the same columns as prescriptions.
What is a prescribing cascade?
A chain of prescriptions: one drug produces an adverse effect, a clinician reads that effect as a fresh problem, and a second drug follows to treat it. A diuretic causing urgency that is then treated with a bladder antimuscarinic is a classic example. Graders reward reviews that spot a cascade, because stopping the first drug can remove the need for the second and the risks it carries.