Formal lines from nursing, therapy and a contracted physiatry group, then advice and trust ties drawn over them: an NU512 Unit 2 structure map of one rehabilitation unit. Searches like "nu 512 unit 2 assignment example", "nu512 unit 2 sample" and "nu512 unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished NU512 Unit 2 unit structure map looks like
Two diagrams, each on its own page, with about three pages of commentary. The first is the formal chart. The nurse manager reports to a director of nursing and then the chief nursing officer; therapists report to a rehabilitation services director under the vice president of operations; the physiatrists belong to a contracted group whose medical director holds a hospital agreement. Case management, pharmacy and environmental services add three more lines, and a dependency table lists what the unit needs from each and who decides. The second diagram keeps the same boxes and redraws the ties from a two-question survey of [thirty-eight] staff, asking whom they go to for advice and whom they trust with a problem. Two people with no supervisory title sit at the center of both networks.
How a NU512 Unit 2 example is structured
Formal structure is drawn first because the informal layer means little without it. Commentary on the first diagram counts decisions rather than boxes: of [eleven] recurring decisions that shape a patient's day, the nurse manager holds [three] outright. Therapy start times, weekend therapy coverage, team conference scheduling and discharge dates all belong elsewhere, and the dependency table names the owner of each. Krackhardt and Hanson's distinction guides the second diagram: advice networks show who holds practical know-how, and trust networks show who people confide in when something goes wrong. A senior physical therapist who builds the daily therapy grid sits at the center of the advice map; a night charge nurse with nineteen years on the unit anchors the trust map. Last comes a forecast for any change that ignores either person.
Three chains, one set of beds
Nursing, therapy and the physiatry group drawn up to the executive each reports to, with the point where the lines finally meet placed [two] levels above the unit.
Eleven decisions and their owners
A table of recurring decisions, from therapy start times to weekend coverage, each with its owner, its approver and the level at which a dispute over it is settled.
Survey in two questions
Whom staff ask for advice and whom they trust with a problem, answered by [thirty-eight] of [forty-four] staff, with names replaced by role codes before any line was drawn.
The therapist who builds the grid
A senior physical therapist holds no title and decides, every afternoon, which patient sees which therapist and when. Advice ties run to her from both professions.
A night charge nurse at the center of trust
Nineteen years on the unit and no formal authority over day staff, yet the trust map routes most problems through her before they reach anyone with a title.
What the maps predict
Any change that reaches the grid without the senior therapist, or the night shift without the charge nurse, is forecast to stall, and the section explains why in each case.
Where marks go in NU512 Unit 2
First comes the question of whether the map shows influence as well as authority. A formal chart alone, however neatly drawn, collects partial credit, because this unit's criteria tend to ask for the relationships the chart omits. The dependency table earns marks by turning a diagram into an argument: it shows how little of the patient's day the nurse manager controls, which later assignments depend on. A method for the informal layer matters too. Influence claimed from impression is weaker than influence traced from a stated question asked of named roles, and citing Krackhardt and Hanson gives the method a source. Privacy draws attention in any section: role codes rather than names, and no detail that identifies a colleague. Legible diagrams with a key and consistent line styles account for the final share.
Get a NU512 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Which people on your unit have influence without a title? Name them by role, sketch who reports where, and attach the Unit 2 instructions with the rubric. From that, a model structure map with both layers arrives within 24-48h, the first one free. Names stay off the page, and your own map remains yours to draw.
NU512 Unit 2 questions, answered
What counts as informal influence on a structure map?
Influence that operates without a position behind it: being asked for advice, being trusted with problems, controlling a schedule or information others need. The sample traces it through two survey questions rather than impressions. On many units the people carrying it are a senior clinician, a long-serving charge nurse or a unit secretary. A title can coexist with informal influence, but the map shows the two separately.
Do I need to survey my coworkers?
Not usually. Most sections accept a map built from observation and experience, provided the basis is stated. The sample's short survey is one way to make the informal layer checkable. If you use one, keep it anonymous, ask permission where your facility requires it, and replace names with role codes. Stating how the ties were identified matters more than the particular method chosen.
Which software should draw the map?
Whatever produces a legible diagram with a key. PowerPoint shapes, Visio, Lucidchart and draw.io are all common, and a clean hand drawing scanned at good resolution is accepted in some sections. What graders check is readability: distinguishable line styles for formal and informal ties, labeled roles, and a diagram that matches the commentary written beneath it.