Dated mobility, pain, dislocation-precaution and fall goals, paired with long-horizon prevention targets, make up a composite total hip replacement plan, the Unit 3 rehabilitation care plan for NU470. Searches like "nu 470 unit 3 assignment example", "nu470 unit 3 sample" and "nu470 unit 3 example" land here.
Six Weeks of Hip Precautions and a Row for the Other Hip: A Rehabilitation Care Plan After Total Hip Replacement
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NU470: Regenerative and Restorative Care Spheres - A Wellness and Prevention Focus
Unit 3 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Composite patient written as a model document. Medications and precautions are as ordered by her surgeon and are not specified here.
Problems, Ordered by What Threatens Recovery Soonest
Risk for dislocation. Goal: no dislocation through week six. Interventions: nurse and occupational therapist teach the posterior-approach precautions her surgeon ordered for six weeks; raised toilet seat and reacher at home; husband taught to help without breaking precautions. Evaluation: no dislocation; she states the precautions on teach-back.
Risk for venous thromboembolism. Goal: no clot during recovery. Interventions: prophylaxis as prescribed; early walking; calf checks each shift. Evaluation: no signs of clot.
Impaired mobility. Goal: walk 150 feet with a rolling walker before discharge on day three; 12 stairs with one rail by week two; a cane by week four. Interventions: physical therapist leads gait and stair training; nurse reinforces walking three times a day. Evaluation: distances and devices recorded each session.
Acute pain. Goal: pain at or below 4 of 10 during walking, tracked against function rather than alone. Interventions: scheduled and as-needed analgesia per orders; ice after therapy. Evaluation: pain score paired with distance walked.
Risk for falls. Goal: no fall. Interventions: night light, clear path to the bathroom, walker within reach. Evaluation: no fall at 30 days.
Osteoarthritis in the other hip, with a body mass index of 31. Goal: at twelve weeks, a walking and strengthening routine she keeps at least five days a week. Interventions: physical therapist designs the home program; nurse links it to her longer-term goals. The walking that restores her gait also protects the remaining joint and her heart, because regular activity improves function and lowers cardiovascular risk (Piercy et al., 2018).
Patient-Reported Outcome
HOOS JR, a short hip disability survey validated for hip replacement (Lyman et al., 2016), was scored at baseline before surgery and will be repeated at twelve weeks, linking this month's goals with those for the years after.
This Month and the Years After
This month's goals protect the new hip and restore walking. The long-horizon row asks what keeps her other hip, and the rest of her, out of the next admission. The same walking program serves both, which is why it sits in the plan from day two rather than being added at discharge. She said her goal for the summer is to walk the botanical garden loop with her sister, about a mile, and that goal is written into the week-twelve review.
References
Lyman, S., Lee, Y.-Y., Franklin, P. D., Li, W., Mayman, D. J., & Padgett, D. E. (2016). Validation of the HOOS, JR: A short-form hip replacement survey. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 474(6), 1472-1482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4718-2
Piercy, K. L., Troiano, R. P., Ballard, R. M., Carlson, S. A., Fulton, J. E., Galuska, D. A., George, S. M., & Olson, R. D. (2018). The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA, 320(19), 2020-2028. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14854
How this NU470 Unit 3 example is structured
Problems are ordered by what threatens recovery soonest, so dislocation and thromboembolism sit near the top even though mobility carries the headline goal. Every goal names a behavior, a measure, a condition and a date, and each evaluation cell restates the measure so a reader can see how success would be judged. Interventions are divided by who acts, nurse, physical therapist, occupational therapist, patient and husband, which makes the interdisciplinary plan explicit without claiming the therapists' work as nursing. Rationales cite sources beside the intervention they support. The long-horizon row carries the course's argument: a walking and strengthening program that restores her gait also protects the remaining joint and her cardiovascular risk, and the plan cites evidence for both effects. A closing paragraph separates this month's goals from those for the years after, with HOOS JR repeated at twelve weeks linking them.
Get an NU470 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
Some sections assign the diagnosis, while others let students choose between a stroke and a joint replacement. Include the Unit 3 prompt, the care plan template your course uses and its rubric, and a model plan for the condition you name arrives within 24-48h. The first sample carries no fee. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
NU470 Unit 3 questions, answered
Can the care plan use a stroke instead of a hip replacement?
Yes, where the prompt permits. The structure holds: dated, measurable goals, interdisciplinary interventions, and a long-horizon row addressing recurrence risk, which for stroke means blood pressure, antithrombotic therapy taken as prescribed and atrial fibrillation follow-up. Name the condition in your request and the sample is built around it rather than around this hip.
Should hip precautions be in a nursing care plan?
Yes, as teaching and reinforcement of the surgeon's orders. Precautions vary by surgical approach and surgeon, so the plan should state them as ordered and for how long, not as general rules. Posterior approaches usually carry more restrictions than anterior ones, and some surgeons now order few or none, which is why the order itself is cited.
Is the patient in the sample real, and whose hours does the plan reflect?
The patient is composite, and the plan models structure only. Any care plan you submit from a clinical placement reflects your own assessment and your own hours, and any preceptor or instructor signature remains between you and them. The sample never stands in for clinical work; it shows how finished written planning is laid out.