Dated mobility, pain, dislocation-precaution and fall goals, paired with long-horizon prevention targets, make up a composite total hip replacement plan, the Unit 3 rehabilitation care plan for NU470. Searches like "nu 470 unit 3 assignment example", "nu470 unit 3 sample" and "nu470 unit 3 example" land here.
What a finished NU470 Unit 3 rehabilitation care plan looks like
Six pages hold the plan, most of them given to a five-column table: problem, goal with a date, nursing interventions, rationale with a source, and evaluation. Six problems appear. Impaired mobility carries the headline goal: [150] feet using a rolling walker before discharge on day [3], a cane by week [four], [12] stairs with one rail by week [two]. Acute pain is tracked on a 0 to 10 scale against function, not in isolation. Risk for dislocation covers the posterior-approach precautions her surgeon ordered for [six] weeks, with equipment such as a raised toilet seat. Risk for venous thromboembolism follows the prescribed prophylaxis. Risk for falls and a long-horizon problem, osteoarthritis in the other hip with a body mass index of [31], close the table. HOOS JR, scored at baseline, supplies the patient-reported outcome.
How a NU470 Unit 3 example is structured
Problems are ordered by what threatens recovery soonest, so dislocation and thromboembolism sit near the top even though mobility carries the headline goal. Every goal names a behavior, a measure, a condition and a date, and each evaluation cell restates the measure so a reader can see how success would be judged. Interventions are divided by who acts, nurse, physical therapist, occupational therapist, patient and husband, which makes the interdisciplinary plan explicit without claiming the therapists' work as nursing. Rationales cite sources beside the intervention they support. The long-horizon row carries the course's argument: a walking and strengthening program that restores her gait also protects the remaining joint and her cardiovascular risk, and the plan cites evidence for both effects. A closing paragraph separates this month's goals from those for the years after, with HOOS JR repeated at [twelve] weeks linking them.
Goals written with a date
Covering [150] feet on a rolling walker before day [3] ends, climbing [12] stairs with one rail by week [two], dressing the lower body with a reacher by discharge: each goal holds a behavior, a measure, a condition and a date.
Precautions, as ordered
No hip flexion past 90 degrees, no crossing the legs and no inward rotation of the operated leg, for the period her surgeon specified; the plan states these as orders to teach and reinforce, not as nursing decisions.
Who does what
Interventions are sorted by nurse, physical therapist, occupational therapist, patient and husband, so the plan shows interdisciplinary work without folding the therapists' tasks into nursing.
The other hip
Osteoarthritis on the left and a body mass index of [31] form the long-horizon row, where a walking and strengthening program is argued, with sources, to protect the remaining joint and lower her cardiovascular risk.
Measured by the patient too
HOOS JR, the short hip survey used in joint replacement programs, is scored at baseline and planned again at [twelve] weeks, giving her own view of function a place beside the clinical measures.
Where marks go in NU470 Unit 3
Measurable goals and a reach past discharge are the two things a care plan here is most often judged on. Goals like improve mobility or manage pain, with no number or date, cost marks on almost every rubric, and a plan whose every goal ends in the first week has answered only half the prompt. Credit goes to goals with behavior, measure, condition and date; rationales cited to current sources; interventions assigned to the right discipline; and at least one long-horizon goal tied to evidence about the next event. Accuracy about orders matters: hip precautions and anticoagulation are presented as prescribed, not chosen by the writer. A patient-reported measure earns notice where the rubric asks for patient-centered care. APA citation of each rationale is typically expected.
Get a NU470 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
Some sections assign the diagnosis, while others let students choose between a stroke and a joint replacement. Include the Unit 3 prompt, the care plan template your course uses and its rubric, and a model plan for the condition you name arrives within 24-48h. The first sample carries no fee.
NU470 Unit 3 questions, answered
Can the care plan use a stroke instead of a hip replacement?
Yes, where the prompt permits. The structure holds: dated, measurable goals, interdisciplinary interventions, and a long-horizon row addressing recurrence risk, which for stroke means blood pressure, antithrombotic therapy taken as prescribed and atrial fibrillation follow-up. Name the condition in your request and the sample is built around it rather than around this hip.
Should hip precautions be in a nursing care plan?
Yes, as teaching and reinforcement of the surgeon's orders. Precautions vary by surgical approach and surgeon, so the plan should state them as ordered and for how long, not as general rules. Posterior approaches usually carry more restrictions than anterior ones, and some surgeons now order few or none, which is why the order itself is cited.
Is the patient in the sample real, and whose hours does the plan reflect?
The patient is composite, and the plan models structure only. Any care plan you submit from a clinical placement reflects your own assessment and your own hours, and any preceptor or instructor signature remains between you and them. The sample never stands in for clinical work; it shows how finished written planning is laid out.