Katz, Lawton, Timed Up and Go and the 30-second chair stand, scored against a reported pre-illness baseline, document hospital-associated decline in a finished NU470 Unit 2 functional assessment. Searches like "nu 470 unit 2 assignment example", "nu470 unit 2 sample" and "nu470 unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished NU470 Unit 2 functional assessment write-up looks like
Most of the four-page write-up sits in one table with a row per instrument and three columns: the reported baseline two weeks before admission, today's score, and the difference with its meaning. Katz falls from [6] to [4], with bathing and transferring now needing help. Lawton drops from [7] of 8 to [3], as shopping, meals, laundry and transportation have passed to his daughter. Timed Up and Go takes [19] seconds, above the 12-second point that STEADI treats as elevated fall risk, and the chair stand yields [6] rises, below the average for men his age. A short narrative describes how he performed each test, including the push off both armrests, and a closing paragraph names the decline as hospital-associated, citing Covinsky and colleagues.
How a NU470 Unit 2 example is structured
Measurement comes before interpretation in every row, so the scores can be checked independently of the argument built on them. The baseline column is the write-up's distinctive move: without it, a Katz score of [4] describes a frail man, while beside a reported [6] it describes a loss that may be recoverable. The narrative states where each baseline figure came from and how reliable a relative's recollection is, which is the honest limit of the method. Performance tests follow the self-report scales because they correct them; he rates himself able to walk the block, and the chair stand disagrees. Interpretation then groups the losses by likely cause, deconditioning, fear of falling and fatigue, before the final paragraph turns the scores into restorative goals. Every score appears with its instrument name, range and source citation.
Baseline beside today
His daughter's account of two weeks before the admission supplies the first column, and the write-up labels it reported rather than measured, since no one scored him then.
Katz and Lawton, item by item
Bathing and transferring move from independent to assisted on the Katz index; on the Lawton scale, shopping, meal preparation, laundry and transportation pass to his daughter, and each lost item is named rather than summarized.
Two performance tests
A [19]-second Timed Up and Go and [6] chair rises in thirty seconds, with a push off both armrests noted, give numbers that disagree with his own report that he can manage the block.
Why the decline happened
Bed rest on the ward, fear after a near-fall there and lingering fatigue are offered as causes, with Covinsky and colleagues' account of hospitalization-associated disability cited to frame what often recovers.
Scores turned into targets
The last paragraph converts each deficit into a measurable restorative goal with a date, so the scores serve as the baseline for a plan instead of a closing verdict on an old man.
Where marks go in NU470 Unit 2
Instruments named, scored and interpreted correctly carry most of the weight in a functional write-up. Adjectives such as weak or unsteady, with no score attached, are the standard shortfall, and a Katz result reported without saying which items changed gives a marker little to credit. Credit follows each instrument cited with its range, the scoring method stated, and a baseline, even a reported one, that turns a single number into a change. Separating what the patient reports from what the tests show is a further sign of a strong write-up. Accuracy on cutoffs matters: a Timed Up and Go threshold quoted without its source, or a chair stand result compared with the wrong age band, is commonly corrected. Honesty rules apply too: in a submitted write-up the scores come from the student's own assessment.
Get a NU470 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Instrument lists differ between sections, and some prompts name the tools while others ask for a choice to be justified. Send your Unit 2 prompt and rubric, mention which instruments your clinical setting uses, and a model write-up scored on those tools reaches you within 24-48h, free the first time.
NU470 Unit 2 questions, answered
Can I use a family member's report as a baseline?
Yes, if it is labeled as reported and its limits are stated. Pre-illness function is rarely measured, so relatives' accounts are a common and accepted source, and the change they reveal is often the most useful finding. The write-up should say who reported it and for what time point, and should not present a recollection as a measured score.
What is the difference between the Katz and Lawton scales?
The Katz index covers basic self-care: bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence and feeding. The Lawton scale covers instrumental activities needed to live independently, such as shopping, cooking, managing medications, finances, transportation and using the telephone. Instrumental abilities usually fail first, so using both shows a fuller picture, and many rubrics expect them together.
Are the scores in the sample from a real patient?
No. The man, his daughter and each score were assembled for illustration, showing how a finished write-up presents and interprets findings. In your own write-up the scores must come from the assessment you performed, in your clinical setting, recorded under your program's rules; the sample only models the structure around them.