A response-to-feedback table, a new household component, a cost-per-quit figure and fresher data years mark the revised project paper NU465 often sets in Unit 9. Searches like "nu 465 unit 9 assignment example", "nu465 unit 9 sample" and "nu465 unit 9 example" land here.
Twenty-Three Comments Answered: The Revision Memo for the Clean Air Cordell Paper
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NU465: Public Health Nursing - Evidence for Practice
Unit 9 Assignment
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Composite program written as a model document. Cost figures are bracketed composites; page numbers refer to the revised paper.
How the Memo Is Organized
Rows are grouped by the size of the change: structural changes to the program first, then evidence and data updates, then wording and APA. Each row gives the comment, its source, the change and the page where it appears.
Structural Changes
Comment: "What happens when she quits and her partner doesn't?" Source: seminar peer. Change: a household referral option added; the problem statement now notes smokers in the home; the logic model gains an output and an external factor. Pages 3, 9, 10.
Comment: "What does a verified quit cost?" Source: seminar peer. Change: a cost-per-quit estimate added. Pages 11 to 12.
Comment: "Defend the comparison county." Source: instructor. Change: a paragraph comparing age, income, Medicaid share and baseline smoking rate. Page 13.
Evidence and Data Updates
Comment: "Data from [2021] are outdated." Source: instructor. Change: replaced with the most recent certificate year. Pages 2 to 3.
Comment: "Add the most recent review of incentives." Source: self-review. Change: the Cochrane review cited in the evidence section (Notley et al., 2019). Page 6.
Fourteen further rows update citations and figures.
Wording and APA
Six rows correct APA formatting, heading levels and table titles.
The Cost-Per-Quit Arithmetic
Total program cost for one year: nurse time [$X], voucher fund [$42,000], monitors and supplies [$Y], totaling about [$49,000]. Expected verified quits: about 10, based on enrolling 40 smokers and a verified abstinence rate near 25 percent. Cost per verified quit: $49,000 รท 10 = about $4,900, with every assumption stated so a reader can change one and recompute.
Declined Suggestions
A classmate proposed a county-wide media campaign. Declined: the evidence match judged mass media wrong for a county with so few births each year, and the budget would be spent reaching people outside the target population.
A suggestion to add e-cigarettes to the outcome. Declined for now: the birth certificate does not ask about them, so the county could not measure change. Noted for a future phase.
The Revised Paper
The revised paper, now about fifteen pages, follows the memo. Changed passages can be found through the page references in the table. The household option draws on the Community Guide's support for quitline referral, extended to partners who want to quit (Community Preventive Services Task Force, n.d.). Placing the memo first lets a marker check each change against the comment that prompted it without rereading the whole paper.
References
Community Preventive Services Task Force. (n.d.). Tobacco use: Quitline interventions. The Community Guide.
Notley, C., Gentry, S., Livingstone-Banks, J., Bauld, L., Perera, R., & Hartmann-Boyce, J. (2019). Incentives for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(7), CD004307. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub6
How this NU465 Unit 9 example is structured
Placing the memo ahead of the paper lets a marker check the revision against the feedback without rereading everything. Rows are grouped by size of change rather than by order received: structural changes to the program first, then evidence and data updates, then wording and APA. The household component is the largest change and is traced through every section it touched, from a new sentence in the problem statement about smokers in the home to an added output and a new external factor in the logic model. The cost-per-quit estimate is shown as arithmetic, total program cost divided by expected verified quits, with its assumptions stated. Declined suggestions get one short, respectful section; a classmate's idea of a county-wide media campaign is declined with the Unit 5 fit argument. The revised paper then follows, with changed passages located through the memo's page references.
Get an NU465 Unit 9 example written to your instructions
Revision requests go best with the returned draft and every comment attached, including any seminar notes. Pass those along, grading criteria included, and the desk produces a model revision memo and revised paper written against each point, back to you in 24-48h, with no charge if it is your first. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
NU465 Unit 9 questions, answered
Is a revision memo required?
Not in every section, but it is widely expected and easy to justify. A memo shows the marker exactly how each comment was handled, which makes a responsive revision visible and protects against the impression that nothing changed. If your instructions do not ask for one, a short table at the start still tends to help, provided it stays within any length limits.
Do I have to accept every piece of feedback?
No, but every piece should be answered. Instructor comments tied to rubric rows are usually worth accepting; peer suggestions can be declined when they conflict with the evidence or the population. The sample declines two and explains each in a sentence, which reads as judgment. Silence on a comment reads as having missed it.
How much should the paper change between Unit 8 and Unit 9?
As much as the feedback requires, and no more. Some revisions are mainly data updates and APA repairs; others, like the sample's, change the program itself. What matters is that changes reach every affected section, so a new program component appears in the logic model, the evaluation and the budget, not in one paragraph only.