NU436 Unit 2 cultural assessment framework paper example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Transcultural Nursing for Diverse Populations Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This page holds a complete NU436 Unit 2 cultural assessment framework paper example in true form. Giger and Davidhizar ask about six phenomena; Leininger's Sunrise Model asks about seven clusters of cultural and social structure; the paper defines the working vocabulary both rely on, maps the frameworks against each other, and chooses one for the population assessment later in the term, with reasons. Most sections set this unit as a cultural assessment framework paper.

What this page holds

Six phenomena against seven Sunrise factors, a glossary of the field's core terms, and a reasoned choice between frameworks: what a framework paper for NU436 Unit 2 commonly holds. Searches like "nu 436 unit 2 assignment example", "nu436 unit 2 sample" and "nu436 unit 2 example" land here.

1

Six Phenomena or Seven Factors: Comparing Giger and Davidhizar's Model With Leininger's Sunrise Model

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU436: Transcultural Nursing for Diverse Populations

Unit 2 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

A model framework comparison written for teaching. No patient is described.

What this part is doingThe title names both frameworks and the count each uses. A reader knows from it that the comparison will be structural.
2

Glossary

Culture: the learned, shared values, beliefs and practices of a group that guide thinking and action (Leininger & McFarland, 2006).

Worldview: the way a person or group looks at the world to form a picture of life (McFarland & Wehbe-Alamah, 2019).

Ethnocentrism: the belief that one's own ways are the best or only right ways.

Cultural imposition: using one's own values and practices to override another person's (Leininger & McFarland, 2006).

Acculturation: the process of changing through contact with another culture.

Emic: the insider's view, what the person says. Etic: the outsider's or professional's view.

Culturally congruent care: care that fits a person's cultural values and lifeways (McFarland & Wehbe-Alamah, 2019).

Giger and Davidhizar's Model

An assessment tool built for the bedside. It asks about six phenomena present in every cultural group: taken here in alphabetical order: biological variations, communication, environmental control, social organization, space, and time (Giger & Haddad, 2021). Each prompts concrete questions a nurse can ask during a short admission.

Leininger's Sunrise Model

A guide to inquiry within Leininger's theory. It directs attention to seven factors: listed alphabetically: cultural values and lifeways; economic; educational; kinship and social; political and legal; religious and philosophical; and technological (McFarland & Wehbe-Alamah, 2019). It is broader and fits a longer relationship or a community study.

Mapping

Communication (Giger) and cultural values and lifeways (Sunrise): overlap partly.

Social organization (Giger) and kinship and social factors (Sunrise): overlap closely.

Environmental control (Giger) and religious and philosophical factors (Sunrise): overlap on health beliefs.

Time and space (Giger): no direct Sunrise equivalent.

Biological variations (Giger): no Sunrise equivalent.

Economic, educational, political and legal factors (Sunrise): no direct Giger equivalent.

Each framework asks something the other misses: Giger and Davidhizar ask about the body, and the Sunrise Model asks about money, schooling and law.

What this part is doingDefinitions come before the comparison so the mapping can use the vocabulary without explanation. The mapping shows gaps in both directions.
3

Alternatives Considered

Purnell's twelve domains offer more coverage than either (Purnell, 2019), and Campinha-Bacote's model describes the nurse's development rather than the patient's culture (Campinha-Bacote, 2002). Both are useful, but neither fits the purpose below as well.

Decision

For the population assessment later in the term, the Sunrise Model is chosen. That assessment will study a community, and the economic, educational and political factors it asks about are where population-level differences in health tend to arise. For a single short admission, Giger and Davidhizar's model would be the better tool; the choice depends on the purpose, not on which framework is better in general.

What this part is doingThe decision is argued against a stated purpose, the population assessment, rather than declared in general. That keeps the other framework available for other uses.
4

References

Campinha-Bacote, J. (2002). The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services: A model of care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13(3), 181-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/10459602013003003

Giger, J. N., & Haddad, L. G. (2021). Transcultural nursing: Assessment and intervention (8th ed.). Elsevier.

Leininger, M. M., & McFarland, M. R. (2006). Culture care diversity and universality: A worldwide nursing theory (2nd ed.). Jones and Bartlett.

McFarland, M. R., & Wehbe-Alamah, H. B. (2019). Leininger's theory of culture care diversity and universality: An overview with a historical retrospective and a view toward the future. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 30(6), 540-557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659619867134

Purnell, L. (2019). Update: The Purnell theory and model for culturally competent health care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 30(2), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659618817587

How this NU436 Unit 2 example is structured

Definitions come before comparison, because the comparison uses the vocabulary without stopping to explain it. Each framework then receives its own section of roughly equal length: origin, purpose, structure and the kind of question it prompts a nurse to ask. Giger and Davidhizar's model is presented as an assessment tool built for the bedside, and Leininger's as a theory whose Sunrise Model guides a broader inquiry into a person's cultural and social world. The comparison section follows the mapping table and discusses three differences in prose: scope, practicality during a short admission, and treatment of biology. Brief mention is made of Purnell's twelve domains and Campinha-Bacote's process model as alternatives the paper considered. The decision section argues for one framework against a stated purpose, the population assessment coming later in the term, rather than declaring it better in general.

Get an NU436 Unit 2 example written to your instructions

If the Unit 2 instructions name particular frameworks, list them; if they let you choose, say which two interest you. Add the rubric and any required glossary terms. The sample defines each term with a source, compares the models by criteria, and makes a reasoned choice. Delivery takes 24-48h, and a first request is free and follows your instructions. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

NU436 Unit 2 questions, answered

Which two frameworks are easiest to compare?

Pairs that differ in purpose make the clearest comparison. Giger and Davidhizar's assessment model and Leininger's Sunrise Model contrast a practical bedside tool with a broad theory. Purnell's model sits between them, with twelve domains organized around person, family, community and global society. Campinha-Bacote's model describes the nurse's development rather than the patient, which makes it a less direct comparison for an assessment paper.

Do I need to define terms if the prompt does not ask for a glossary?

It usually helps. Transcultural nursing terms are easy to use loosely, and defining the four or five your paper depends on shows precision without taking much space. A short paragraph works as well as a table. Cite each definition to its source, since instructors often check whether terms are used as the theorists intended.

Is it acceptable to criticize a well-known framework?

Yes, if the criticism is specific and fair. Noting that a model asks for more time than an acute admission allows, or that it says little about structural racism or economics, is legitimate analysis. Dismissing a framework as outdated without explanation is not. The strongest papers credit what each model does well before naming its limits.