NU435 Unit 5 goals of care dialogue example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Hospice and Palliative Nursing Care Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This page holds a complete NU435 Unit 5 goals of care dialogue example in true form. A week after scans showed a composite 59-year-old woman's pancreatic cancer growing through second-line chemotherapy, a palliative nurse leads a conversation with her and her husband; the script follows the Serious Illness Conversation Guide, times each silence, labels each move and ends in a chart note. Most sections set this unit as a goals of care dialogue.

What this page holds

Scripted line by line and annotated against SPIKES and the Serious Illness Conversation Guide, a talk with a composite patient and her husband forms this NU435 Unit 5 dialogue. Searches like "nu 435 unit 5 assignment example", "nu435 unit 5 sample" and "nu435 unit 5 example" land here.

1

A Goals of Care Dialogue With Silences Timed: Pancreatic Cancer Growing Through Second-Line Chemotherapy

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU435: Hospice and Palliative Nursing Care

Unit 5 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Composite patient and husband written as a model document. Bracketed times mark pauses; the right-hand labels name each move.

What this part is doingThe title tells the reader that silences are part of the evidence. The labels show the structure behind a conversation that should sound natural.
2

Setting

A clinic room. The oncologist shared the scan results last week. She asked to talk with "someone who has time."

The Dialogue

Nurse: Would it be all right if we talked about what's ahead, and what matters most to you? [asking permission]

Patient: Yes. That's why I came.

Nurse: What's your understanding of where things are with your illness? [asking understanding]

Patient: The chemo stopped working.

Nurse: The chemo stopped working. [8 seconds] [repeating her words; waiting]

Patient: And the cancer's bigger. He said the next options aren't as good.

Nurse: How much information about what's likely ahead would be helpful for you? [information preference]

Patient: I want to know. He doesn't. [looks at husband]

Husband: What about the trial? The one in the city?

Nurse: That's an important question, and I want to come back to it before we finish. [acknowledging; promising to return]

Nurse: I wish we had better treatments. I'm worried that time may be shorter than we'd hope, maybe months rather than years. [wish and worry statement] [12 seconds]

Patient: [crying] I thought so.

Nurse: This is a lot to hear. [naming emotion]

Patient: I'm scared of being in pain. And of him being alone.

Nurse: What are your most important goals if your health gets worse? [goals]

Patient: Being home. Seeing my daughter's baby in March.

Nurse: What gives you strength? [strength]

Patient: My church. Him.

Nurse: What abilities are so important that you can't imagine living without them? [critical abilities]

Patient: Knowing who people are. Talking to them.

Nurse: If you get sicker, what would you put up with for a chance at more time, and what would be too much? [trade-offs]

Patient: Not the hospital again. Not a machine.

Nurse: About the trial. Let's ask Dr. [name] whether you'd qualify and what it would involve, so you can weigh it against being home. [returning to husband's question]

The longest silence follows the wish and worry statement, because nothing the nurse could add would help her hear it.

What this part is doingEarly lines ask rather than tell, and her phrase "the chemo stopped working" is repeated rather than corrected into clinical language. The husband's question is acknowledged, promised a return and returned to.
3

Frameworks Behind the Moves

The sequence follows the Serious Illness Conversation Guide, which moves from permission through understanding, information preference, prognosis, goals, fears, strengths, critical abilities, trade-offs and family (Bernacki & Block, 2014). SPIKES informed the first third, where she set the pace for the news (Baile et al., 2000). Naming her emotion before adding any fact draws on the NURSE statements that VitalTalk teaches (Back et al., 2005).

Chart Note

Goals of care conversation with patient and husband. Her words: "The chemo stopped working." "I want to know." Goals: "Being home. Seeing my daughter's baby in March." Fears: pain; husband being alone. Critical abilities: "Knowing who people are. Talking to them." Trade-offs: "Not the hospital again. Not a machine." Husband asked about a clinical trial; referred to oncologist for eligibility. Nurse's inference, recorded separately: she may prefer hospice at home if the trial is not an option; not yet discussed with her.

What this part is doingThe chart note records her words verbatim and keeps the nurse's inference separate, so the next clinician can tell what she said from what the nurse thought.
4

References

Back, A. L., Arnold, R. M., Baile, W. F., Tulsky, J. A., & Fryer-Edwards, K. (2005). Approaching difficult communication tasks in oncology. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 55(3), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.55.3.164

Baile, W. F., Buckman, R., Lenzi, R., Glober, G., Beale, E. A., & Kudelka, A. P. (2000). SPIKES: A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: Application to the patient with cancer. The Oncologist, 5(4), 302-311. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302

Bernacki, R. E., & Block, S. D. (2014). Communication about serious illness care goals: A review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(12), 1994-2003. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271

How this NU435 Unit 5 example is structured

The guide orders the dialogue, but the annotations are what carry the marks. Early lines ask rather than tell: her understanding comes before any information, and when she says the chemo stopped working, the nurse repeats that phrase instead of correcting it into clinical language. Her husband interrupts with a question about a clinical trial; the script shows the nurse acknowledging it, promising to return to it, and doing so later. The prognosis section restates what the oncologist shared last week inside a wish and worry statement and then stops, followed by the longest silence in the script. Emotion is answered with a naming statement before any fact is added, drawn from the NURSE mnemonic that VitalTalk teaches. Trade-offs come late, once goals are on the table. The chart note separates what she said from what the nurse inferred.

Get an NU435 Unit 5 example written to your instructions

Scripted dialogues vary widely by section: some want a transcript, others a narrative with quoted lines, a few a reflection alongside. Which format and which framework does yours name? Tell the desk, include the rubric, and a free first dialogue in that format follows within 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

NU435 Unit 5 questions, answered

Does the dialogue have to follow a named framework?

Most prompts expect one, and naming it without using it is the usual weakness. SPIKES suits delivering serious news, and the Serious Illness Conversation Guide suits exploring values and priorities, so many papers combine them as the sample does. If your course assigns REMAP or another model from VitalTalk, the annotations should be built around that model instead.

Can the conversation include a nurse discussing prognosis?

It can include the nurse reinforcing what the physician has already shared, checking understanding, and responding to questions within the team's agreed message. It should not have the nurse delivering a new prognosis alone. The sample makes that boundary visible in its margin notes, and your paper will read as stronger if it shows the same awareness of role.

How should silences be shown in a written dialogue?

Bracketed and timed, with a margin note on why the nurse waited. A silence that simply appears reads like a formatting gap. Explained, it shows the reader a skill most students find hardest in practice: letting a person absorb difficult news before adding facts. Two or three well-placed silences are usually enough to make the point.