NU432 Unit 3 chronic disease case study example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Primary Care in the Ambulatory Setting Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This page holds a complete NU432 Unit 3 chronic disease case study example in true form. Across four visits in ten weeks, a composite 52-year-old school bus driver's blood pressure moves from 152/96 in the office to a home average of 128/82; the case follows each visit by what the RN measured, taught and passed to the prescribing clinician, with her driver's medical certificate renewal in the background. Most sections set this unit as a chronic disease case study.

What this page holds

Hypertension managed between appointments grounds this NU432 Unit 3 study: four visits, a validated home cuff, AMA MAP measurement, and medication decisions bracketed as the clinician's. Searches like "nu 432 unit 3 assignment example", "nu432 unit 3 sample" and "nu432 unit 3 example" land here.

1

Four Visits, Ten Weeks, 152/96 to a Home Average of 128/82: A Hypertension Case Study in RN Measurement and Teaching

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU432: Primary Care in the Ambulatory Setting

Unit 3 Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Composite patient written as a model document. Medications are bracketed and set by the prescribing clinician.

What this part is doingThe title gives the arc in numbers. A reader knows from it that the case is about change over time, measured carefully.
2

Portrait

She drives a split shift, with a route starting at 6:10, and rarely eats breakfast. Her father had a stroke at 61. Her commercial driver's medical certificate is due for renewal in four months, which makes the numbers matter to her.

Trend Table

Visit 1, [date]: office 152/96 (average of two); no home log yet; regimen [agent A] started by the clinician; taught home monitoring technique.

Visit 2, [date]: office 144/90; home 7-day average 138/86; regimen unchanged; checked her monitor against the office device.

Visit 3, [date]: office 136/84; home 132/84; regimen [agent A, dose adjusted]; ankle swelling reported and routed.

Visit 4, [date]: office 130/80; home 128/82; regimen [agent B substituted]; nurse checks moved to every three months.

Visit 1: Measuring Properly

Two readings taken once she had rested five minutes in a chair with her back against it, both feet on the floor and her arm resting at the level of her heart, using a large adult cuff for an arm circumference of 37 cm, averaged (Muntner et al., 2019). Method is recorded every time, since a number obtained with an undersized cuff, or right after a fast walk in from the parking lot, cannot be set beside the previous one.

Visit 2: Checking the Home Monitor

Her home monitor read 6 points higher than the office device on side-by-side readings, within acceptable agreement. Her log was complete for 6 of 7 days. She had been checking once each morning; the RN showed her how to take two readings a minute apart and record both.

Visit 3: A Complaint at the Door

She mentioned ankle swelling as she was leaving. The RN measured it, noted pitting, and routed it to the clinician the same afternoon, who changed the regimen.

Visit 4: At Goal

Her home average fell below 130/80, the target in the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline for most adults with hypertension (Whelton et al., 2018). Nurse checks moved to every three months.

What this part is doingEach visit follows one pattern: interval history, method, readings, what was taught or checked, and what was routed.
3

Discussion

The case follows the AMA's framework of measuring accurately, acting rapidly and partnering with patients (American Medical Association, n.d.). Accurate measurement came first, with the right cuff and a checked home monitor. Rapid action meant routing the swelling the same afternoon rather than at the next visit. Partnership meant building the plan around her route and her certificate renewal, which gave her a reason of her own to keep the log.

What this part is doingThe discussion ties each visit to the framework. It shows that careful measurement came before any change in treatment.
4

References

American Medical Association. (n.d.). MAP BP: Measure accurately, act rapidly, partner with patients. American Medical Association.

Muntner, P., Shimbo, D., Carey, R. M., Charleston, J. B., Gaillard, T., Misra, S., Myers, M. G., Ogedegbe, G., Schwartz, J. E., Townsend, R. R., Urbina, E. M., Viera, A. J., White, W. B., & Wright, J. T. (2019). Measurement of blood pressure in humans: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension, 73(5), e35-e66. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087

Whelton, P. K., Carey, R. M., Aronow, W. S., Casey, D. E., Collins, K. J., Dennison Himmelfarb, C., DePalma, S. M., Gidding, S., Jamerson, K. A., Jones, D. W., MacLaughlin, E. J., Muntner, P., Ovbiagele, B., Smith, S. C., Spencer, C. C., Stafford, R. S., Taler, S. J., Thomas, R. J., Williams, K. A., ... Wright, J. T. (2018). 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension, 71(6), e13-e115. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065

How this NU432 Unit 3 example is structured

A short portrait opens the case: split shifts, a route that starts at 6:10, no regular breakfast, a father who had a stroke at 61, and a certificate renewal due in four months that makes the numbers matter to her. The trend table comes next so the arc is visible before the detail. Each visit then follows one pattern: interval history, measurement method, readings, what the RN taught or checked, what was routed and to whom. Method is stated every time, because a reading taken with the wrong cuff or after a brisk walk from the parking lot is not comparable to the last one. The discussion ties the case to the AMA's MAP framework, measure accurately, act rapidly, partner with patients, and cites the current ACC/AHA guideline for the categories and target. Medication names appear only in brackets.

Get an NU432 Unit 3 example written to your instructions

A hypertension case like this one, or whichever condition your Unit 3 case follows, can be modeled from the visits your instructor released and the rubric that grades them. Expect the sample within 24-48h, free the first time, with every medication decision left to the clinician and every value in brackets. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

NU432 Unit 3 questions, answered

Which blood pressure guideline should the case cite?

Usually the current ACC/AHA adult hypertension guideline, under which stage 1 begins at a systolic of 130 or a diastolic of 80, and stage 2 at 140/90. Cite the edition year. Some sections accept JNC 7 for historical contrast, but grading a patient against retired categories without saying so tends to cost marks. Follow whatever source your prompt names.

Can the RN in the case change the medication if readings stay high?

Not on the RN's own authority. In practices that use a signed titration protocol, where state rules allow it, an RN may adjust within its limits, and a case can describe that if the protocol is named. Without one, the RN documents the readings and messages the prescriber. The sample leaves every regimen in brackets and shows only the routing, which keeps the paper inside scope.

How many home readings make a useful log?

Published home monitoring guidance commonly asks for two readings morning and evening over about seven days, with the first day often discarded. The case should state the schedule it used and report the average, not a single best reading. If your case gives only office values, say home monitoring was advised and bracket any projected numbers.