Inputs through medium-term outcomes on a single page, with each arrow's assumption written out and one long-term outcome deliberately removed: NS410 Unit 3's logic model for the Harrow Street pilot. Searches like "ns 410 unit 3 assignment example", "ns410 unit 3 sample" and "ns410 unit 3 example" land here.
What a finished NS410 Unit 3 program logic model looks like
The model itself fills one horizontal page, followed by three pages of narrative. Inputs list what exists and what must be bought: the church kitchen, the food bank's produce, a part-time coordinator, a part-time demonstration cook, a consulting registered dietitian, an interpreter, childcare and grant funds still to be costed. Activities include twelve Saturday sessions across two cohorts of 20 households, a take-home ingredient bag at each, a weekly tasting table at distribution, and WIC referral offers at enrollment. Outputs are counts: sessions held, households attending four or more, bags distributed, tastings served, referrals offered. Short-term outcomes cover confidence with unfamiliar vegetables and vegetables cooked at home; medium-term outcomes cover a smaller share of produce discarded and WIC enrollments completed. External factors, such as donation volume and season, sit in a band across the bottom.
How a NS410 Unit 3 example is structured
The narrative walks the model from right to left, starting with the outcomes the pantry wants and asking what would have to happen for each, the planning direction the W.K. Kellogg Foundation's 2004 logic model guide describes. Each arrow then gets a sentence naming its assumption and the evidence for it: that households take produce they have seen cooked rests on the focus group; that a single burner suffices rests on the survey's oven finding. Weak arrows are marked as such. One long-term outcome, lower rates of child overweight, appears struck through with a note explaining why a 24-week pilot for 40 households cannot plausibly move it and would only invite a claim the evaluation cannot support. The narrative ends by listing which arrows the later evaluation must test.
Built from the right-hand side
Outcomes are written first and activities derived from them, so no activity appears simply because the pantry has done it before; the narrative names the two that failed that test, a printed newsletter and a nutrition bingo night.
Assumptions under every arrow
Small text beneath each connection names the condition that link depends on, and a column of sources shows whether the assumption rests on the needs assessment, published research or nothing yet.
Outputs kept as counts
Sessions held, bags given and referrals offered are listed as outputs only. None is allowed into the outcome columns, which the narrative explains as the most common confusion in logic models.
An outcome struck through
Child weight status is shown crossed out rather than deleted, with the reasoning beside it, so the program's limits read as considered rather than overlooked.
External factors in their own band
Donation volume, summer surplus and the food bank's delivery schedule sit along the bottom, since each can change the discard figure regardless of anything the program does.
Where marks go in NS410 Unit 3
Rubrics for this assignment typically assess logical coherence, correct placement of components, the realism of the outcomes and the narrative explanation. Placement errors cost the most: outputs listed as outcomes, activities written as goals, or inputs that include the results the program hopes for. Coherence suffers when an activity points at nothing, or when an outcome is fed by nothing, and graders usually trace every line. Outcomes that promise population change from a small pilot draw deductions for realism, which is why the sample removes one openly. A model with no assumptions or external factors reads as untested, and several sections mark it down. The narrative earns credit when it explains the model's reasoning rather than restating each box in prose; for a nutrition program, that includes where the food comes from.
Get a NS410 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
Whether your section supplies a logic model template or leaves the format open, send what applies together with two or three sentences on the program being planned, plus the prompt and rubric for Unit 3. The model gets built from outcomes backward with assumptions stated under each arrow. A first custom sample is free, and delivery runs 24-48h.
NS410 Unit 3 questions, answered
What is the difference between an output and an outcome?
An output counts what the program did, such as sessions held or bags handed out. An outcome describes a change in the people or conditions the program serves, such as more households cooking vegetables at home. The test is whether the item could be achieved even if nobody benefited; if it could, it is an output.
Should the model include long-term impact?
Only impact the program could plausibly contribute to within its time frame, or impact clearly labeled as aspirational. Many templates have an impact column, and leaving it empty looks careless, so the stronger approach is to fill it modestly or strike an item through with a reason, as this sample does with child weight status.
How detailed should the inputs column be?
Detailed enough that a budget can be built from it later. Naming staff roles, the space, the food source and the equipment gives later budget work a list to price. Dollar figures usually wait until then, though some instructors want an estimated total in the model, and the prompt will say which.