| Course | NS106 Nutrition Profession and Career Planning |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 5 |
| Paper type | Informational interview report |
| Length | About 810 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Nutrition Science |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NS106 Unit 5
What a Diabetes Educator Said About the Bachelor's Route: A Unit 5 Informational Interview Report
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NS106: Nutrition Profession and Career Planning
Unit 5 Informational Interview Report
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The interviewee, her clinic and the writer's plans are composite; the credentialing and labor sources cited are real.
The Interview
I interviewed Lena, a composite registered dietitian nutritionist and certified diabetes care and education specialist who leads the diabetes education program at a federally qualified community health center. We spoke for forty minutes by video. I chose her because her program offers the kind of class my mother could not attend: evening sessions in English and Spanish, run partly by a community health worker.
I asked six questions: how she reached her role, what her days involve, who else teaches in her program, what credentials her program requires for each role, what she would tell someone starting a bachelor's degree, and what she would do differently.
What She Said, in Brief
Lena became a registered dietitian through a coordinated program and later added the diabetes educator credential after two years of work. About half of her week is individual counseling with patients referred by physicians, a quarter is teaching group classes and the rest is administration and supervising staff. Her group classes are co-taught by a community health worker without a nutrition degree and a nutrition educator with a bachelor's degree. The individualized counseling must be done by her or another dietitian, because it is medical nutrition therapy. She advised me to get paid experience in community settings before choosing between graduate school and work.
What It Changed
Her answers changed my plan in three ways.
First, the bachelor's route is real. I had assumed that without the registered dietitian credential I would not be hired to teach nutrition in a health setting. Lena's program employs a nutrition educator with a bachelor's degree, and she said similar positions exist in extension programs and the federal nutrition program for women, infants and children. The Bureau of Labor Statistics groups many of these roles with dietitians and nutritionists, which can hide how varied the entry routes are (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024).
Second, the line between teaching and counseling is sharper than I thought. Lena described sending patients from her group class to individual sessions whenever they asked about their own medications or blood sugar targets. A nutrition educator can teach the class; only a dietitian can answer those individual questions. My mother's case would have needed both.
The interview did not talk me out of becoming a dietitian; it showed me that the work I most want to do, teaching people like my mother, is already being done by someone with a bachelor's degree, working beside a dietitian who handles what I could not.
Third, timing matters more than I realized. Lena said the graduate requirement for the registered dietitian credential, in effect since 2024 (Commission on Dietetic Registration, 2024), makes the route longer and more expensive, and that many of her younger colleagues worked for a few years before starting graduate programs. She said that experience made them stronger applicants and helped them choose a graduate focus.
What I Did Not Expect
I expected Lena to describe her work as counseling. She described it as coordination: scheduling classes around patients' work hours, finding interpreters, arguing with insurers about coverage for education. She said the hardest part of her job is not nutrition science but getting patients into the room. A national audit of entry-level practice found that dietitians' work spans assessment, intervention, education and management (Rogers et al., 2021), but Lena's account showed me how much of that management happens before any teaching begins. That changed how I think about the skills I need. I had been focusing on biochemistry; she emphasized communication, Spanish and comfort with community organizations.
How the Interview Was Arranged
I found Lena through my university's alumni network and sent a short email explaining my interest and asking for thirty minutes. I sent my six questions in advance so she could think about them, and I followed up with a thank-you note that mentioned one piece of advice I planned to act on. She offered to introduce me to the nutrition educator in her program, which I plan to accept.
Questions I Should Have Asked
I did not ask about salary, which I was embarrassed to raise, or about how the bachelor's-level educator was hired. Both would have helped. I will ask about hiring in my next interview.
How I Will Use It
The interview gives me two concrete next steps: look for paid or volunteer roles in community nutrition education during my degree, and keep the graduate route open rather than committing to it now. I will bring both to the professional development plan in Unit 9.
References
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024). Dietitians and nutritionists. In Occupational outlook handbook. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/dietitians-and-nutritionists.htm
Commission on Dietetic Registration. (2024). Registered dietitian nutritionist eligibility requirements. https://www.cdrnet.org
Rogers, D., Griswold, K., Sauer, K. L., Abbay, E., Coufal, A., Eastman, W., Lawson, K., Slack, D., & Sulik, B. (2021). Entry-level registered dietitian and dietetic technician, registered practice today: Results from the 2020 Commission on Dietetic Registration entry-level dietetics practice audit. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 121(2), 330-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2020.09.027
The Purdue Global NS106 Unit 5 instructions
The informational interview unit asks students to speak with a practitioner in a role or setting they are considering and write about what they learned. Prompts usually expect who was interviewed and why, the questions asked, a brief summary of answers and an extended reflection on how the conversation changed the student's thinking or plans. Choose someone whose role you might pursue. Prepare questions about the path, the daily work, colleagues' credentials and advice. Take notes with permission rather than relying on memory. Spend most of the report on what changed for you, not on transcribing answers. Note what surprised you and what you wish you had asked. Link the results to later planning. Three to four pages is typical.
How the NS 106 Unit 5 example is put together
The report introduces the interviewee and why she was chosen, then lists the six questions. A short summary of her path, her week and her program's staffing follows. The central section explains three changes: the bachelor's route exists, the line between teaching and counseling is sharp, and timing for graduate study matters. The highlighted sentence states how the interview reframed the writer's goal. A section describes her surprise at how much of the job is coordination, citing a national practice audit. Sections explain how the interview was arranged, which questions went unasked and how the findings will feed the development plan. Each change is tied to a specific answer the interviewee gave.
NS106 Unit 5 rubric: what earns full points
NS106 interview reports are typically scored on the quality of reflection more than on the interview itself. Points go to explaining specifically how the conversation changed the student's understanding or plans. A well-chosen interviewee and thoughtful questions earn credit under preparation. Accurate references to credentials or settings, cited where facts are stated, count under accuracy. Honest discussion of surprises and of questions left unasked shows critical thinking. Professional conduct, such as arranging and following up appropriately, is often credited. Plain prose and correct APA take the last points. Reports that read as transcripts of answers, with no reflection, usually score low. Naming a concrete next step that follows from the interview often completes the top band.
Common NS106 Unit 5 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Interview reports often transcribe the conversation question by question and leave the reflection to a closing paragraph. Another weakness is choosing someone whose work is unrelated to the student's goals, which limits what can be learned. Students sometimes accept every answer without comparing it to what they had assumed. The practical details of arranging and following up are rarely mentioned, though they show professionalism. Reports seldom say what the student will do differently. If you have finished your interview and have notes, mark the two or three answers that surprised you most, because those few answers are where the report's reflection should begin.
Get an NS106 Unit 5 example written to your instructions
Describe who you interviewed by role and setting and share your notes or a summary of the answers, together with the Unit 5 materials your instructor posted, rubric among them. The report comes back organized by theme, your plan revision stated, in 24-48h and without charge for a first order. Unshared names and details stay bracketed, since the conversation itself was yours. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More NS106 papers and BS in Nutrition Science samples
- NS106 Unit 1: Career Motive Post
- NS106 Unit 2: Credential Comparison
- NS106 Unit 3: Scope of Practice Memo
- NS106 Unit 4: Ethics Analysis
- NS106 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- NS106 Unit 7: Resume and Cover Letter
- NS106 Unit 8: Career Portfolio
- NS106 Unit 9: Professional Development Plan
- NS106 Unit 10: Career Synthesis Paper
- NS105 Unit 5: Fat and Protein Comparison
NS106 Unit 5 questions, answered
Can you conduct the interview for me?
No, and a report built on an interview you did not hold would not survive a follow-up question from your instructor. The conversation has to be yours. What a sample can do is show how the report around it is organized: questions grouped by purpose, answers condensed, and most of the length spent on what the conversation changed.
Who counts as a good person to interview?
Someone who holds the credential and works in the setting you are considering, since the report is stronger when the conversation tests your own plan. A registered dietitian in a clinic, a nutrition educator in a public health program or a food service director can all work. Check whether your section requires a particular credential before you reach out.
Should I record the conversation?
Only with clear permission, and many practitioners prefer notes to a recording. Written notes taken during the call, cleaned up the same day, are usually enough for a report that paraphrases rather than transcribes. If you do record, say so in the method paragraph and do not attach the audio unless the prompt specifically asks for it.
Where can I find a free NS106 Unit 5 sample paper?
This page holds a complete Unit 5 informational interview report with a community diabetes educator, focused on what changed in the writer's plans, with APA references.
What should an informational interview report focus on?
Mainly on what the conversation changed about your thinking or plans. A brief summary of the answers is enough; the reflection on their meaning carries most of the grade.