| Course | NS105 Fundamentals of Nutrition |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 10 |
| Paper type | Nutrition case summary |
| Length | About 1,100 words, 7 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Nutrition Science |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NS105 Unit 10
One Clerk, Four Methods, One Account: A Unit 10 Nutrition Case Summary of an Overnight Hotel Worker
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NS105: Fundamentals of Nutrition
Unit 10 Nutrition Case Summary
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The clerk and every figure are composite, drawn from the earlier units; the reference intakes, guidelines, nutrient density and shift work sources cited are real.
The Person
Gloria, a composite 36-year-old, covers the hotel's night desk on a five-night rotation and sleeps through the late morning and early afternoon. She is on her feet for parts of each shift but otherwise sedentary. She has no diagnosed health conditions and takes no medications. She describes her eating as "whatever is around when I'm hungry."
The Evidence Base
This summary draws on four pieces of earlier work: a three-day food record, the energy and macronutrient calculations from that record, a nutrient density comparison of snacks and a week-long comparison with the national dietary guidelines. Where figures appear in more than one piece, they have been checked against each other and reconciled to the week-long averages.
Energy and Macronutrients
Gloria's average intake was about 2,100 kilocalories a day. Applying the general energy factors to her averages gives about 1,040 kilocalories from carbohydrate, 330 from protein and 740 from fat, with the remainder rounding error. As shares: carbohydrate about 49 percent, protein about 16 percent and fat about 35 percent. Carbohydrate and protein fall within the adult ranges; fat sits at the upper edge of its 20 to 35 percent range (Institute of Medicine, 2005). Her protein, about 82 grams, is comfortably above the allowance for her weight.
Her intake is slightly above the 1,800 to 2,000 kilocalories the guidelines estimate for a woman of her age and activity. The difference is small and could reflect estimation error, but it is consistent with her report of slow weight gain over two years.
Food Groups and Limits
Compared with the 2,000-kilocalorie Healthy U.S.-Style Dietary Pattern, Gloria eats about half a cup of fruit and 1.2 cups of vegetables a day against recommended amounts of 2 and 2.5 cups. Her grains are slightly above the pattern but almost entirely refined, and her dairy is half the recommended amount. Her protein foods match the pattern in amount but include no seafood. She exceeds the limits for added sugars, about 13 percent of energy against less than 10, for saturated fat and for sodium, about 3,600 milligrams against less than 2,300 (U.S. Department of Agriculture & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2020).
Nutrients of Concern
The food group gaps explain the nutrients that fall short. Her fiber, about 14 grams a day, is little more than half of the 25 grams recommended for women. Potassium and calcium are below their reference values. These shortfalls come mainly from the missing fruit, vegetables, whole grains and dairy, not from eating too little overall.
Snack Quality
Much of Gloria's overnight eating comes from vending machine crackers, cola and cookies from the hotel's breakfast setup. Per 100 kilocalories, foods like these supply little protein, fiber, calcium or potassium. The snack comparison showed that options such as plain yogurt, carrots with hummus or almonds deliver several times more of those nutrients for the same energy. Nutrient density has limits as a measure, since it ignores portion and depends on which nutrients are counted (Drewnowski, 2005), but the direction of the difference is clear.
Read together, the four pieces of evidence point to one pattern rather than four problems: Gloria eats enough, even slightly more than she needs, but the foods available at the hours she works are low in fiber, potassium and calcium and high in added sugars and sodium.
The Role of Timing
Gloria's schedule shapes what she eats more than her preferences do. Most of the week's cooked vegetables appear on the days she spends at her sister's table. On work nights, food choices are limited to what she brings, what the vending machine holds and what the hotel sets out. A review of shift workers found their total daily energy intake similar to that of day workers (Bonham et al., 2016), which matches Gloria's case: the concern is not quantity but the quality of what is available overnight.
How the Pieces Were Reconciled
The earlier units used slightly different figures because they covered different spans: three days for the record and calculations, a full week for the guidance analysis. This summary uses the week-long averages throughout, since a longer record better represents usual intake. Where the three-day figures differed, as with energy, which averaged 2,120 kilocalories over three days and about 2,100 over seven, the week's figure is used. The snack comparison used generic products, so its findings are applied to Gloria's snacks by direction rather than by exact values. Reconciling the figures this way means each number in the summary appears once, in one form.
What Gloria Said
When the findings were shared with her, Gloria said the overnight snacks were the part she had never thought about, because "nobody counts what you eat at three in the morning." She was most interested in the drink change, since she already keeps water at the desk. She was skeptical about packing food, saying she often forgets, and suggested keeping fruit and yogurt in the staff refrigerator at the start of each week instead. Her suggestion is a better version of the recommendation than the one first drafted.
Recommendations Within Scope
Three changes address the main findings without asking Gloria to change her job or schedule.
1. Pack the overnight snack. Yogurt, fruit or carrots with hummus brought from home would replace crackers and cookies, adding fiber, calcium and potassium.
2. Change one drink. Replacing the 4:30 a.m. cola with water or milk would remove about 65 grams of added sugar on work nights and, with milk, add dairy.
3. Make the first meal whole grain. Oatmeal or whole-wheat toast at her 3 p.m. "breakfast" would raise whole grains and fiber.
Limits of the Evidence
The intake data are self-reported, and several restaurant and family meals were estimated. Seven days may not represent her usual intake. No laboratory or body measurements were available, so the summary describes intake, not nutritional status. Gloria's weight gain and any health concerns belong with her physician.
Conclusion
Gloria's diet supplies enough energy and protein but falls short on fruit, vegetables, whole grains and dairy, and exceeds limits on added sugars and sodium. The pattern traces to the foods available during her overnight shift. Small changes to what she packs and drinks would address most of the gaps.
References
Bonham, M. P., Bonnell, E. K., & Huggins, C. E. (2016). Energy intake of shift workers compared to fixed day workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chronobiology International, 33(8), 1086-1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2016.1192188
Drewnowski, A. (2005). Concept of a nutritious food: Toward a nutrient density score. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 82(4), 721-732. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/82.4.721
Institute of Medicine. (2005). Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10490
U.S. Department of Agriculture & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2020). Dietary guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025 (9th ed.). https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov
NS105 Unit 10 instructions, in plain terms
The case summary asks students to integrate their earlier units into a single nutrition profile of one person. Prompts typically expect a description of the person, the intake data and its reliability, energy and macronutrients against reference values, food groups against the guidelines, nutrients of concern, recommendations within scope and limitations. Write it as one account, not four reprinted assignments. Reconcile figures that differ between earlier units and explain which you use. Connect findings to one another and to the person's circumstances. Include the person's own response if available. Keep recommendations small and practical. State what the evidence cannot show and what belongs to a physician. Five to six pages is typical.
How this NS105 Unit 10 example is built
The person is introduced with her schedule and health status. A short section names the four pieces of evidence and how they were reconciled. Energy and macronutrient shares are set against reference ranges, then food groups and limits against the guidelines, then nutrients of concern linked to the missing foods. Snack quality is summarized from the density comparison with its limits. The highlighted sentence integrates the findings into one pattern. Sections on timing, reconciliation of figures and Gloria's own reaction follow, the last of which improves a recommendation. Three recommendations, limits and a conclusion close the summary. Every figure in the summary matches the week-long averages exactly.
Reading the NS105 Unit 10 grading rubric
NS105 case summaries are generally scored on integration, accuracy and appropriate recommendations. Integration is the most heavily weighted criterion, judged by whether the separate analyses become one connected account with consistent figures. Accuracy covers reference values, calculations and statements about the guidelines. Recommendations earn points when they follow from the findings, fit the person's circumstances and stay within scope. Discussion of limits and referral is scored under critical thinking. Clear organization, APA citations and professional writing complete the rubric. A summary that reprints earlier units with conflicting numbers, or that recommends a complete diet overhaul, usually loses integration points. Including the person's own reaction to the findings is often credited as client-centered practice.
Common NS105 Unit 10 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Case summaries often stack earlier assignments one after another, with figures that do not match between sections. Another weakness is listing every finding without saying which matter most or how they relate. Students frequently ignore the person's circumstances, so recommendations do not fit their life. Limits of self-reported intake are rarely discussed. Health concerns that belong to a physician are sometimes addressed by the student. The person's own view is almost never included, though it can sharpen a recommendation. Once the earlier units are finished, a single list of their key figures is the place to start reconciling them into one account. A paragraph explaining which figures were chosen when units disagreed saves a grader from guessing.
Get an NS105 Unit 10 example written to your instructions
Send the Unit 10 instructions and rubric along with whatever earlier work your section expects the summary to draw on, whether your own tables or a case your instructor provided. The profile is assembled from those findings, reorganized by theme, and returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample comes at no cost. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More NS105 papers and BS in Nutrition Science samples
- NS105 Unit 1: Nutrient Definition Post
- NS105 Unit 2: Digestion Summary
- NS105 Unit 3: Energy Calculation Set
- NS105 Unit 4: Carbohydrate Profile
- NS105 Unit 5: Fat and Protein Comparison
- NS105 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- NS105 Unit 7: Three-Day Food Record
- NS105 Unit 8: Nutrient Density Comparison
- NS105 Unit 9: Dietary Guidance Analysis
NS105 Unit 10 questions, answered
Can the case be me?
Many sections allow it, and it works well because the earlier units already hold your data. Write about yourself in the third person if the prompt asks for a case format, and leave out anything identifying or medical. If your section provides a case instead, use that one; a swapped case usually earns nothing however well it is written.
Do I need new calculations?
Usually not, although it pays to recheck the earlier ones before reusing them, since a final paper inherits every error. Where figures from different units disagree, reconcile them and explain the correction briefly. Some prompts add one new element, such as an energy estimate for the case, and the rubric will say so when they do.
How long should the conclusion be?
One focused paragraph is typical. It should state what the evidence shows about the pattern, note the main limit of that evidence, and stop. Conclusions that introduce new data or new recommendations tend to lose marks, since everything in them should already be supported earlier in the summary. Answering the case's opening question in the first sentence is a dependable shape.
Where can I find a free NS105 Unit 10 sample paper?
This page presents a complete Unit 10 nutrition case summary of an overnight hotel clerk, integrating four analyses with margin notes and APA references.
How should figures that differ between earlier units be handled?
Choose the better-supported figure, such as a week-long average over a three-day one, use it consistently throughout and explain the choice once so each number appears in only one form.