MT480 Unit 3 Bond Valuation Problem Set Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Corporate Finance Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

A composite mushroom grower's 5.40 percent notes with eleven years left anchor this MT480 Unit 3 bond valuation problem set, priced at $1,000, $921.89 and $1,086.46 as required yields move from 5.40 to 6.40 and 4.40 percent. A one-point rise costs $78.11 and a one-point drop gains $86.46, showing convexity, while a three-year note moves only $27.13 and $28.05. A quoted price of 96.35 implies a 5.855 percent yield to maturity and a 5.605 percent current yield, an eight-year zero loses 7.45 percent when its yield rises a point and a callable issue yields 5.43 percent to maturity but 5.18 to call. Fabozzi on convexity and Brealey, Myers and Allen on call features support each step. Purdue Global MT 480, Corporate Finance, assigns the set in the BS in Business Administration.

CourseMT480 Corporate Finance
UnitUnit 3
Paper typeBond valuation problems
LengthAbout 870 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MT480 Unit 3

1

$921.89, $1,000 and $1,086.46: An MT480 Unit 3 Bond Valuation Problem Set on Price Against Required Return

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

MT480: Corporate Finance

Unit 3 Bond Valuation Problems

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Brandywine Hollow Mushrooms, its notes and every figure are composite; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingPreviewing what the five problems prove together tells the reader the set builds one argument about bond prices.
2

The Layout

Each problem states the bond's terms, draws a timeline of semiannual coupons and principal, applies the price formula with its semiannual adjustments and closes with a sentence on what the answer means for Brandywine Hollow Mushrooms, the composite grower whose financing the course follows. Semiannual payment matters throughout: a 5.40 percent annual coupon on a $1,000 note pays $27 every six months, and yields are divided by two and periods doubled before discounting.

Problem 1: The Grower's Notes at Three Yields

The grower's 5.40 percent notes have eleven years, 22 semiannual periods, left to maturity. Each period pays $27, and $1,000 is repaid at the end. Its value today adds the discounted worth of all 22 coupons to the discounted worth of the final $1,000.

At a required yield of 5.40 percent, the coupon equals the yield, and the notes sell at par, $1,000. At 6.40 percent, discounting at 3.2 percent a period, the price falls to about $921.89. At 4.40 percent, discounting at 2.2 percent, it rises to about $1,086.46.

A one-point rise in yield costs $78.11; a one-point fall gains $86.46. The asymmetry is convexity: a drop in yield lifts the price more than an equal rise in yield lowers it, which favors holders of long bonds when rates are uncertain. Fabozzi (2015) describes convexity as the curvature of the price and yield relationship, and these three prices show it in a way a formula alone does not.

Problem 2: A Shorter Note Moves Less

The grower also has a three-year note with a 4.90 percent coupon, priced at par. A one-point rise in yield, to 5.90 percent, lowers its price by about $27.13; a one-point drop lifts it about $28.05. The same one-point change that moved the eleven-year notes by roughly $80 moves the three-year note by under $30.

The same one-point move in rates shifts the eleven-year notes about three times as much as the three-year note.

What this part is doingSetting the two maturities side by side makes interest rate risk visible as a dollar figure.
3

Longer maturities put more of a bond's value in distant payments, which are discounted most heavily, so they respond more to changes in yield. A treasurer worried about rising rates would prefer short notes; one expecting rates to fall would prefer long ones.

Problem 3: From a Quoted Price to a Yield

A dealer quotes the grower's eleven-year notes at 96.35, meaning 96.35 percent of face value, $963.50. Solving the price formula for the yield that makes the present value of the payments equal $963.50 gives a yield to maturity of about 5.855 percent a year. Dividing the $54 of annual coupons by the $963.50 price gives the current yield, about 5.605 percent. The yield to maturity is higher than the current yield because the buyer also gains $36.50 when the note is repaid at par.

Problem 4: A Zero-Coupon Bond

An eight-year zero-coupon bond makes a single payment, at the end. Using semiannual compounding, a rise in its yield from 6.1 percent to 7.1 percent lowers its price by about 7.45 percent. A zero is the most sensitive bond of a given maturity, because all of its value sits in one distant payment.

Problem 5: A Callable Issue

The grower is considering a new ten-year bond with a 6.25 percent coupon, callable after four years at $1,030. If it sells for $1,062.50, its yield to maturity is about 5.43 percent, but its yield to call, assuming the grower redeems it at the first opportunity, is about 5.18 percent. Brealey et al. (2020) note that a call option held by the issuer lowers the bond's value to investors, so they should expect the lower figure, because a borrower calls bonds when rates have fallen, exactly when the bond would otherwise rise in value. The call protects the grower and costs the investor; the price reflects that trade.

What the Results Mean for the Grower's Refinancing

The grower's notes now trade below par because market yields have risen above their 5.40 percent coupon. That has two consequences. Investors buying the notes today earn more than the coupon, through the gain at maturity. And if the grower issues new debt, it must pay the current market rate, not the old coupon, which is why Unit 7 values the notes at market price rather than face value. A treasurer reading these problems would also note that a callable structure buys the company flexibility to refinance if rates fall, at the price of a higher coupon or a lower issue price today.

What the Set Shows

Taken together, the problems show four things a treasurer needs: price and yield move in opposite directions, longer and zero-coupon bonds move more, a market price always implies a yield and a call feature limits an investor's gain. Ross et al. (2022) present bond valuation as the simplest application of discounting, and these problems use it to answer the questions the grower will face when it refinances its notes in Unit 7.

What this part is doingLinking the bond results to later units shows the set builds tools the course will use again.
4

References

Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2020). Principles of corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Fabozzi, F. J. (2015). Bond markets, analysis, and strategies (9th ed.). Pearson.

Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. D. (2022). Fundamentals of corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw Hill.

The Purdue Global MT480 Unit 3 instructions

MT480 Unit 3 asks you to value bonds and explain how their prices respond to changing yields. Use one layout for every problem: the bond's terms, a timeline of coupons and principal, the price formula with semiannual adjustments and the answer with its meaning. Typical problems price a bond at several yields, compare maturities, solve for yield to maturity from a quoted price, value a zero-coupon bond and handle a call feature. Explain the patterns the numbers reveal, such as why longer bonds move more and why price gains exceed losses for equal yield moves. Distinguish current yield from yield to maturity. Close with what the results mean for the issuer, such as refinancing or the choice of maturity. About four pages with five problems is common, and semiannual conventions should be applied consistently throughout the set.

Inside the MT480 Unit 3 example

The Brandywine Hollow set opens with its layout and the semiannual convention. The first problem prices the eleven-year notes at three yields and explains the asymmetry with Fabozzi on convexity. The second compares a three-year note, under a highlighted line on how much more the long notes move. The third backs out a yield from a dealer quote and explains why it exceeds the current yield. The fourth shows a zero's sensitivity. The fifth values a callable bond, citing Brealey and colleagues on why investors should expect the yield to call. A section explains what the results mean for refinancing, since the notes now trade below par and new debt must pay market rates. A closing section, citing Ross and colleagues, summarizes four lessons a treasurer needs and links them to the cost of capital in Unit 7.

MT480 Unit 3 rubric: what earns full points

Bond valuation sets are graded on correct pricing and on interpreting the patterns. Instructors credit consistent semiannual treatment, a common source of lost points. Explaining why prices move opposite to yields, and why longer and zero-coupon bonds move more, shows understanding beyond calculation. Recognizing convexity in the asymmetry of price changes is often rewarded. Distinguishing current yield from yield to maturity, with the reason for the difference, is a frequent marking point. Handling a call feature by computing yield to call, and explaining why investors focus on it, shows depth. Connecting results to the issuer's decisions, such as refinancing, shows application. Clear timelines and labeled answers help the grader follow each problem.

MT480 Unit 3 help: mistakes that cost points

The commonest Unit 3 error is using annual periods for a bond that pays semiannually, which misprices every answer. Another is confusing the coupon rate with the yield. Students often report prices without explaining what the differences between them show. Current yield is frequently presented as the bond's return, ignoring the gain or loss at maturity. Callable bonds are commonly valued only to maturity. Before submitting, check that every discount rate is halved and every period count doubled for semiannual bonds. Then compare your prices at the higher and lower yields and confirm that the gain from a fall exceeds the loss from a rise. If it does not, recheck the arithmetic. Finally, write one sentence on what each result means for the company that issued the bond.

Get an MT480 Unit 3 example written to your instructions

Which bonds did your Unit 3 problems describe? Send the terms and questions as written, the rubric, and whether your section expects a financial calculator, tables or a spreadsheet. The custom solutions price every bond from a coupon timeline and explain each move in yield. The first sample costs nothing and generally arrives in 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More MT480 papers and BS in Business Administration samples

MT480 Unit 3 questions, answered

Why does the long bond move more than the short one?

More of its value sits in cash flows far in the future, and discounting magnifies a rate change the further out a payment falls. The eleven-year notes carry twenty-two coupons and a distant principal, the three-year note only six coupons. The sample shows the effect numerically, 78.11 dollars against 27.13 for the same one-point rise, before it offers that explanation in words.

What is yield to worst?

The lowest yield an investor could earn among the possible outcomes, usually the yield to maturity or the yield to each call date. For a bond trading above its call price, the call is often the worse case, as with the sample's premium issue at 4.155 percent. For a bond below par, redemption at maturity usually gives the lower figure, so yield to maturity governs there.

Do I need to show the formula if I use a calculator?

Most rubrics reward a visible setup: coupon per period, number of periods, rate per period and face value, whatever tool produced the answer. The sample writes the formula once per problem with numbers substituted, then reports the result. That gives a grader something to follow if the final figure is off, which is where partial credit usually lives in problem sets.

Where can I find a free MT480 Unit 3 sample paper?

This page carries the complete MT480 Unit 3 set of five bond problems built on a composite mushroom grower's notes, from pricing to a callable issue.

Why does the long note move more than the short one in the MT480 Unit 3 sample?

More of its value sits in distant payments, which are discounted most heavily, so a one-point change moves it about three times as much.