| Course | MT455 Strategic Management of Sales |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 3 |
| Paper type | Coverage model analysis |
| Length | About 1,120 words, 7 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MT455 Unit 3
Sized by Workload, Priced by Segment: An MT455 Unit 3 Coverage Model Analysis for an Access Control Company
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
MT455: Strategic Management of Sales
Unit 3 Coverage Model Analysis
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Keystrand Access, its segments, its costs and every figure are composite; the sources cited are real.
The Question
The Unit 2 memo concluded that Keystrand Access, a composite maker of door readers, locks and cloud access control software, deploys its sellers against the strategy: field sellers spend most of their hours on small deals, while health systems and large apartment operators, the segments the board chose, go underserved. This analysis designs a coverage model from the ground up and prices it.
Two Tests, Applied in Order
Every segment is assigned a channel by two tests, always in the same order. First, what is the segment worth: the average annual value of an account and how much selling cost it can bear. Second, how do its customers buy: whether they expect in-person meetings, involve many people, negotiate centrally or prefer to buy without a seller at all. Value alone would push the most sellers toward the richest accounts regardless of how they buy; buying preference alone would ignore cost. Zoltners et al. (2004) recommend sizing a sales force from the workload each segment requires rather than from last year's headcount, and the model follows that method.
The Workload Method
For each segment the model estimates the number of accounts, the contacts each account needs in a year and the contacts one seller in the assigned channel can make. A field seller, traveling to meetings, can make about 560 meaningful customer contacts a year. An inside seller, working by phone and video, can make about 2,400. Dividing a segment's total contacts by the channel's capacity gives the headcount. Loaded annual cost is about $232,000 for a field seller and $118,000 for an inside seller.
Health Systems and Campuses
There are about 380 health systems and university campuses in Keystrand's regions. Each needs about 16 contacts a year, because a sale involves security, facilities, IT, compliance and clinical leaders, plus an integrator partner, and renewals require ongoing attention. That is 6,080 contacts, which at 560 per field seller needs 11 field sellers. The cost is about $6,700 per account against an average annual account value of about $58,000. Value supports field coverage, and buying behavior confirms it: these buyers expect site walks and in-person security reviews.
Large Multifamily Operators
About 110 operators each manage more than 5,000 apartment units. Each needs about 15 contacts a year, mostly at headquarters, where portfolio-wide contracts are negotiated, and then during rollout. That is 1,650 contacts and 3 field sellers, at about $6,300 per account against an average value of about $74,000. Value alone would push field sellers here, and buying preference confirms it: operators negotiate in person at headquarters and expect one owner of the relationship.
Mid-Market Multi-Site Customers
About 3,400 mid-sized organizations run several sites: clinics, offices, schools and retailers. Each needs about 5 contacts a year, and these buyers are comfortable with video calls and online demonstrations. Their 17,000 contacts become 7 inside sellers at 2,400 contacts each, about $243 per account against an average value of about $9,800.
A comparison row tests the alternative. Covering the same mid-market with field sellers would need 30 people, at 560 contacts each, and cost about $2,047 per account. That is more than a fifth of the segment's average annual value spent on selling alone. The comparison is the clearest single argument for inside coverage.
Field coverage for the mid-market would cost more than a fifth of what each account is worth.
Smaller Multifamily Owners
About 2,400 smaller apartment owners each need about 3 contacts a year. Their 7,200 contacts become 3 inside sellers, about $148 per account against an average value of about $4,200. Owners at this size buy by phone and often through an integrator who installs the hardware.
Single-Site Small Businesses
About 21,000 single-site businesses buy a few readers and a basic subscription, with an average annual value of about $1,900. No seller can cover them economically. Instead, 4 partner managers, at about $165,000 each, work with the integrators who already install security systems for these businesses, and a digital program at about $942,000 a year runs online quotes, self-service ordering and marketing. Together these cost about $76 per account.
How Accounts Move Between Channels
Segments are not permanent. A mid-market customer that grows to a dozen sites and begins asking for in-person security reviews should move to a field seller, and a small apartment owner that sells most of its buildings should move to the partner channel. The model sets two triggers for review: an account whose annual value passes $40,000 is reviewed for field coverage, and an account whose value falls below $2,500 is reviewed for partner or digital coverage. Reviews happen twice a year, and an account in an active sale stays with its seller until the deal closes. Without such rules, sellers tend to hold on to accounts that have outgrown or shrunk below their channel, and the costs the model was built to control creep back.
Totals
The model totals 14 field sellers, 10 inside sellers, 4 partner managers and the digital program. Field coverage costs about $3.25 million, inside $1.18 million, partner management $660,000 and the digital program $942,000, for about $6.03 million a year. Today's organization of 38 sellers and their support costs about $7.48 million.
What the Difference Is For
The difference of about $1.45 million is not a saving to be banked. The model covers new business and expansion, but it does not yet size coverage for renewals of the growing subscription base, which the strategy depends on. Renewal coverage will be sized separately once renewal volumes by segment are known, and the difference is held for it. Rackham and DeVincentis (1999) argue that sales organizations create more value when they match the cost of selling to the value each type of customer places on the seller's involvement, and the renewal question is exactly that.
Limits of the Model
Three limits apply. Contact capacities are averages, and a seller new to health systems will make fewer meaningful contacts in the first two quarters. Contacts per account are estimates from current sellers and should be checked against a sample of actual account histories. And the model assumes integrators will take on single-site customers; if partner recruitment lags, some single-site demand may go unserved for a year. Johnston and Marshall (2021) note that coverage models should be revisited as soon as real workload data replaces estimates, so the model will be rerun after two quarters.
References
Johnston, M. W., & Marshall, G. W. (2021). Sales force management: Leadership, innovation, technology (13th ed.). Routledge.
Rackham, N., & DeVincentis, J. (1999). Rethinking the sales force: Redefining selling to create and capture customer value. McGraw-Hill.
Zoltners, A. A., Sinha, P., & Lorimer, S. E. (2004). Sales force design for strategic advantage. Palgrave Macmillan.
What the MT455 Unit 3 assignment asks for
MT455 Unit 3 calls for a coverage model that assigns each customer segment to a sales channel and sizes the headcount. Define segments by account count, value and buying behavior. Apply the same tests to every segment in the same order, usually value first and buying preference second, so each assignment can be checked. Use workload arithmetic: contacts each account needs a year, multiplied by accounts, divided by the contacts one seller in the channel can make. Price each channel per account and compare it with what the segment is worth. Test at least one rejected alternative with the same arithmetic. Include partners and digital channels with their costs. Total the model and compare it with today's organization, saying what any difference is for. Rules for moving accounts between channels and the model's limits round out most strong papers. About six pages with one coverage table is common.
How the MT 455 Unit 3 example is put together
The analysis opens with the question left by the Unit 2 memo and states its two tests, citing Zoltners and colleagues on sizing from workload. The workload method sets contact capacities and loaded costs for field and inside sellers. Each segment then gets its own section with accounts, contacts, headcount, cost per account and value: health systems, apartment operators, mid-market, smaller owners and single-site businesses. The mid-market section prices the rejected field alternative, under a highlighted line on spending more than a fifth of account value on selling. A section sets two value triggers for moving accounts between channels. Totals follow by channel. The difference from today's cost is held for renewal coverage, with Rackham and DeVincentis on matching selling cost to value. A limits section, citing Johnston and Marshall, promises a rerun after two quarters of real data.
Reading the MT455 Unit 3 grading rubric
Coverage models are graded on method and consistency. Instructors credit workload arithmetic shown step by step, so headcounts can be checked rather than taken on trust. Applying the same tests to each segment in the same order is a frequent marking point. Pricing each channel per account against segment value shows economic reasoning. A rejected alternative tested with the same numbers is often the most persuasive part of the paper. Including partner and digital costs, not treating them as free, shows completeness. A total compared with the current organization, with the difference explained, turns analysis into a decision. Rules for reassigning accounts and honest limits show the model can be maintained. A single clear coverage table carries presentation marks. Sources on sales force design should support the method rather than restate definitions.
MT455 Unit 3 help from the desk
Weak Unit 3 models assign channels by intuition, putting field sellers on big accounts without showing workload. Another common problem uses one contact capacity for every channel, which ignores the core difference between field and inside selling. Costs are often left out of partner and digital channels. Students frequently skip the comparison with today's organization. Rejected alternatives are rarely tested. Segment definitions sometimes overlap, so accounts could fall into two rows. Before submitting, divide each segment's total contacts by your channel capacity and check that the headcount in your table matches. Then compute cost per account for each segment and compare it with account value. If selling cost exceeds about a fifth of value anywhere, either the channel or the segment definition probably needs another look.
Get an MT455 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
If your Unit 3 prompt supplies segments and costs, send them with the rubric; if it asks you to build them for a company of your choice, name the company. Workload, headcount and cost per account are worked out in a custom coverage analysis delivered in 24-48h, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More MT455 papers and BS in Business Administration samples
- MT455 Unit 1: Sales Manager Time Board Post
- MT455 Unit 2: Sales Strategy Alignment Memo
- MT455 Unit 4: Sales Role Profile
- MT455 Unit 5: Coaching Plan
- MT455 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- MT455 Unit 7: Incentive Plan Evaluation
- MT455 Unit 8: Quota Setting Exercise
- MT455 Unit 9: Pipeline Forecast Review
- MT455 Unit 10: Sales Organization Plan
- MT453 Unit 3: Food Plant Buying Center Analysis
- MT451 Unit 3: Battery Mower Adoption Analysis
- MT450 Unit 3: Brand Associations Analysis
MT455 Unit 3 questions, answered
How do I estimate how many contacts a segment needs?
Think about how the segment buys. Complex accounts with long cycles and several decision makers need frequent contact during a sale and regular reviews afterward; simple repeat buyers need little. Your case may give call frequencies. If not, state reasonable assumptions, explain them, and show how headcount would change if they were wrong, which graders generally value more than precision.
How do inside and field sales differ?
Field sellers meet customers in person and usually own the biggest, most involved accounts. Remote sellers work by phone, video and email, reach far more customers per day at lower cost, and increasingly handle substantial deals. Many companies now use hybrid roles. For a coverage analysis, the key difference is capacity and cost per contact, which your model should state.
Should partners and online channels have costs in the model?
Yes. Partner channels cost margin, partner management staff and support, and digital channels cost marketing, software and service. Treating them as free makes every alternative to direct selling look better than it is. A small line for each, even estimated, lets the reader compare channels honestly and shows you understand that no coverage is costless.
Where can I find a free MT455 Unit 3 sample paper?
The complete MT455 Unit 3 coverage model is on this page, sizing field, inside, partner and digital channels for a composite access control company's five segments.
Why does the MT455 Unit 3 sample put the mid-market on inside sellers?
Field coverage would need 30 people at about $2,047 per account, more than a fifth of the segment's $9,800 average value, while 7 inside sellers cost about $243 per account.